Tax increment financing (TIF) has been widely adopted as an economic development tool by municipalities. This study estimates a structural probit model of municipal TIF adoption decisions using data drawn from cities in Indiana. It provides empirical evidence that factors such as fiscal pressures, tax competition, economic distress, industrial composition, availability of alternative programmes and the expected gains in property values from the use of TIF exert significant influence in a city's decision to adopt a TIF programme. After using an accurate measure of prior growth, this analysis finds no empirical evidence to support the contention that growing cities are more likely to adopt TIF.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, J.E. (1990) Tax increment financing: municipal adoption and growth, National Tax Journal, 43, pp. 155-163.
2.
Anderson, J.E. and Wassmer, R.W. (1995) The decision to 'bid for business': municipal behavior in granting property tax abatements, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 25, pp. 739-757.
3.
Bartik, T.J. (1990) The market failure approach to regional economic development policy, Economic Development Quarterly, 4, pp. 361-370.
4.
Bartik, T.J. (1991) Who Benefits from State and Local Economic Development Policies? Kalamazo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
5.
Brueckner, J.K. (1979) Property values, local public expenditure and economic efficiency, Journal of Public Economics, 11, pp. 223-245.
6.
Brueckner, J.K. (1982) A test for allocative efficiency in the local public sector, Journal of Public Economics, 19, pp. 311-331.
7.
Duffy-Deno, K. and Eberts, R.W. (1991) Public infrastructure and regional economic development: a simultaneous equation approach, Journal of Urban Economics , 30, pp. 329-343.
8.
Green, G.P., Fleischmann, A. and Kwong, T.M. (1996) The effectiveness of local economic development policies in the 1980s, Social Science Quarterly, 77, pp. 609-625.
9.
Heckman, J.J. (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error , Econometrica, 47, pp. 153 — 161.
10.
Huddleston, J.R. (1982) Local financial dimensions of tax increment financing: a cost revenue analysis, Public Budgeting and Finance, 2, pp. 40-49.
11.
Johnson, C.L. and Kriz, K.A. (1997) A review of state tax increment financing laws. Working Paper, School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University.
12.
Klacik, D. (1994) Indiana TIFs: A study of tax increment financing in Indiana. Center for Urban Policy and the Environment, School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University.
13.
Klemanski, J.S. (1990) Using tax increment financing for urban redevelopment projects, Economic Development Quarterly, 4, 23-28.
14.
Lee, L.-F. (1978) Unionism and wage rates: a simultaneous equations model with qualitative and limited dependent variables, International Economic Review, 19, pp. 415-433.
15.
Lee, L.-F. (1979) Identification and estimation in binary choice models with limited (censored) dependent variables, Econometrica , 47, pp.977-996.
16.
Maddala, G.S. (1983) Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
McHone, W.W. (1987) Factors in the adoption of industrial development incentives by states, Applied Economics, 23, pp. 17-29.
18.
Morgan, W.E. and Hackbart, M.M. (1974) An analysis of state and local industrial development subsidies, Growth and Change, 7, pp. 37-43.
19.
Munnell, A.H. (1990) Why has productivity growth declined? productivity and public investment, New England Economic Review, pp. 3-22.
20.
Oates, W.E. (1969) The effects of property taxes and local public spending on property values: an empirical study of tax capitalization and the Tiebout hypothesis, Journal of Political Economy, 77, pp. 957-971.
21.
Paetsch, J.R. and Dahlstrom, R.K. (1990) Tax increment financing: what it is and how it works, in: R. Bingham, E. Hill, and S. White (Eds) Financing Economic Development: An Institutional Response, pp. 82-98. London: Sage Publications .
22.
Papke, L.E. (1994) Tax, policy and urban development: evidence from the Indiana enterprise zone program, Journal of Public Economics , 54, pp. 37-50.
23.
Rosen, K.T. (1982) The impact of Proposition 13 on house prices in northern California: a test of the interjurisdictional capitalization hypothesis , Journal of Political Economy, 90, pp. 191-200.
24.
Shannon, J. (1991) Federalism's 'invisible regulator': interjurisdictional competition, in: D. Kenyon and J. Kincaid (Eds) Competition Among States and Local Governments: Efficiency and Equity in American Federalism , pp. 117-125. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
25.
Wassmer, R.W. (1994) Can local incentives alter a metropolitan city's economic development?, UrbanStudies, 31, pp. 1251-1278.
26.
Wheaton, W. (1977) A bid rent approach to housing demand, Journal of Urban Economics, 4, pp. 200-217.
27.
Yinger, J., Borsch-Supan, A., Bloom, H.S. and Ladd, H.F. (1988) Property Taxes and House Values: The Theory and Estimation of Intra-jurisdictional Property Tax Capitalisation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
