Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper draws upon the poverty literature and examines the desirable properties of a descriptive statistic of affordability—namely, that it should satisfy three axioms, monotonicity, transfer and transfer sensitivity. The descriptive statistics of headcounts and averages do not satisfy these three axioms and policies using these statistics as allocative tools may be misallocating resources. The paper advocates the use of a Foster, Greer, Thorbecke statistic (FGT). Examples of different hypothetical households are used to show the contradictory results that can be obtained by using the current statistics. As a case study, the paper compares regional affordability rankings in England by looking at the FGT, headcount and mean values of the rent—income ratio using the 1995/96 Existing Tenants' Survey.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chaplin, R. , Martin, S. , Yang, J.H. and Whitehead, C. (1994) Affordability: definitions, measures and implications for lenders. Discussion Paper 45, Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge.

Department Of Social Security (1992) Households Below Average Income: A Statistical Analysis 1979-1988/89. London: HMSO.

Foster, J.E. , Greer, J. and Thorbecke, E. (1984) A class of decomposable poverty measures, Econometrica, 52, pp. 761-766.

Freeman, A. and Whitehead, C. (1995) Affordability revisited in English housing association assured new let accommodation 1992-95. Discussion Paper 60, Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge.

Freeman, A. and Whitehead, C. (1997) Housing association rent structures: are they adjusting to the market? Discussion Paper 89, Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge .

Freeman, A. , Chaplin, R. and Whitehead, C. (1997) Rental affordability: a review of international literature. Discussion Paper 88, Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge .

Hancock, K. (1993) Can pay? Won't pay? Or economic principles of affordability, Urban Studies, 30, pp. 127-145.

Hills, J. , Hubert, H. , Tomann, H. and Whitehead, C. (1990) Shifting subsidy from bricks and mortar to people: experiences in Britain and West Germany, Housing Studies, 5(3), pp.147-167.

Kakwani, N.C. (1980) On a class of poverty measures, Econometrica, 48, pp. 437-446.

10.

King, A. (1994) Towards Indicators of Housing Stress in Australia . Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

11.

Maclennan, D. and Williams, R. (1990) Affordable Housing in Britain and America. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

12.

Mori (1996) Housing Association Tenants in 1995. London: Housing Corporation.

13.

Quibria, M.G. (1992) Understanding poverty: an introduction to conceptual and measurement issues, Asian Development Review, 9(2), pp. 90-112.

14.

Randolph, B. (Ed.) (1992) Housing associations after the Act: an assessment of the impact of the 1988 Housing Act on housing association activity in England. Research Report No. 16, National Federation of Housing Associations, London .

15.

Sen, A.K. (1976) Poverty: an ordinal approach to measurement, Econometrica, 44, pp. 219-231.

16.

Whitehead, C. (1991) From need to affordability, Urban Studies 28, pp. 871-887.

Towards an Accurate Description of Affordability

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References