Current literature on the new urban governance highlights the changes in patterns of relationships between actors at the local level, but also emphasises the continuing or even increasing importance of central government; in urban policy in particular there has been notable centralisation. Using a case study of urban regeneration within the Thames Gateway area of London, the paper examines the locus of power in the relationships between central and local government and the key economic interests; this allows a reappraisal of the claims of the local authority to be enabling development. The paper then turns to the language of enabling as found in policy and academic literature and argues both that changes in the language of policy have been distinctive and that this is actively contributing to the new urban governance. This analysis is grounded in a framework for considering the relationship of language to the policy process, proposing a rhetorical methodology of policy discourse analysis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bailey, N., with Barker, A. and Macdonald, K. (1995) Partnership Agencies in British Urban Policy. London: UCL Press.
2.
Bassett, K. (1996) Partnerships, business elites and urban politics: new forms of governance in an English city, UrbanStudies , 33, pp. 539-555.
3.
Billig, M. (1991) Ideology and Opinion. London : Sage.
4.
Brindley, T., Rydin, Y. and Stoker, G. (1996) Remaking Planning, 2nd edn. London: Rout-ledge.
5.
Clark, M. and Stewart, J. (1989) Challenging Old Assumptions. London: LGMB.
6.
Davoudi, S. and Healey, P. (1995) City Challenge: sustainable process or temporary gesture ?Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy , 13, pp. 79-95.
7.
Doe (Department Of Environment) (1995) The Thames Gateway Planning Framework, RPG 9a. London: DoE.
8.
Doe (Department Of Environment)/Se Regional Office (1994 ) RPG for the South East, RPG 9. London : DoE.
9.
Dowding, K. (1991) Rational Choice and Political Power. Aldershot : Edward Elgar.
10.
Dowding, K., Dunleavy, P., King, D. and Margetts, H. (1995) Rational choice and community power structures , Political Studies, 43, pp. 265-277.
11.
Dowding, K., Dunleavy, P., King, D. ET AL. (in press) Reframing the Urban Question: the contribution of rational choice, in: G. Stoker (Ed.) Community, Power and Participation: The Changing Local Government of Britain. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
12.
Dryzek, J. (1996) Democracy in Capitalist Times. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
Dunleavy, P. (1991) Democracy, Bureaucracy and Public Choice. Hemel Hempstead : Harvester.
14.
Edelman, M. (1988) Constructing the Political Spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Ennals, K. and O'Brien, J. (1990) The Enabling Role of Local Authorities. London: Public Finance Foundation.
16.
Fischer, F. and Forester, J. (1993) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning . London: UCL Press.
17.
Friedmann, J. (1995) Teaching planning theory, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14, pp. 156-163.
18.
Giddens, A. (1976) New Rules of Sociological Method. London: Hutchinson.
19.
GoL (Government Office For London) (1996) Strategy Guidance for London Planning Authorities. RPG 3. London: GoL.
20.
Gold, J.R. and Ward, S.V. (1994) Place Promotion: The Use of Publicity and Marketing to Sell Towns and Regions. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
21.
Goodwin, M. (1996) Governing the spaces of difference: regulation and globalisation in London, Urban Studies, 33, pp. 1395-1406.
22.
Goodwin, M., Duncan, S. and Halford, S. (1993) Regulation theory, the local state and the transition of urban politics, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 11, pp. 67-88.
23.
Hajer, M. (1995) The Politics of Environmental Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
Hall, T. and Hubbard, P. (1996) The entrepreneurial city: new urban politics, new urban geographies?, Progress in Human Geography, 20, pp. 153-174.
25.
Harding, A. (1994) Urban regimes and growth machines: towards a cross-national research agenda, Urban Affairs Quarterly, 29, pp. 356-382.
26.
Harding, A. and Garside, P. (1995) Urban and economic development, in: J. Stewart and G. Stoker (Eds) Local Government in the 1990s, pp. 166-190. London : Macmillan.
27.
Hastings, A. (1996) Unravelling the process of 'partnership' in urban regeneration policy, Urban Studies, 33, pp. 253-268.
28.
King, D. (1995) From the urban left to the new right: normative theory and local government, in: J. Stewart and G. Stoker (Eds) Local Government in the 1990s, pp. 228-248. London: Macmillan.
29.
Lbbd (London Borough Of Barking And Dagenham) (n.d.a) Barking Reach: A Private and Public Enterprise initiative. LBBD.
30.
Lbbd (London Borough Of Barking And Dagenham) (n.d.b) A Partner in the East Thames Corridor. LBBD.
31.
Leach, S. (1992) Strategic land-use planning: the implications of post-abolition experience in the metropolitan counties for the current reorganisation debate, Strategic Government, Winter, pp. 1-50.
32.
Leach, S., Stewart, J. and Walsh, K. (1994) The Changing Organisation and Management of Local Government. London: Macmillan.
33.
Logan, J. and Molotch, H. (1987) Urban Fortunes. Berkeley, CA : University of California Press.
Mackintosh, M. (1992) Partnership: issues of policy and negotiation, Local Economy, 7, pp. 210-224.
36.
Mazza, L. and Rydin, Y. (Eds) (1997) Urban sustainability: discourses, networks and policy tools, Progress in Planning, 47(1), pp. 1-74.
37.
Mossberger, K. and Stoker, G. (1997) Inner-city policy in Britain: why will it not go away?, Urban Affairs Review, 32, pp. 378-402.
38.
Myerson, G. (1994) Rhetoric, Reason and Society. London: Sage.
39.
Myerson, G. and Rydin, Y. (1996) The Language of Environment. London: UCL Press.
40.
Newman, I. (1996) Discourse and the public sector, Local Government Policy Making, 23, pp. 52-59.
41.
Parkinson, M. (1996) Twenty-five years of urban policy in Britain: partnership, entrepreurialism or competition?, Public Money and Management , July-September, pp. 7-14.
42.
Peck, J. (1995) Moving and shaking: business elites, state localism and urban privatism, Progress in Human Geography, 19, pp. 16-46.
43.
Perelman, C. and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969) The New Rhetoric. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press .
44.
Ridley, N. (1988) The Local Right: Enabling not Providing. London: Conservative Political Centre.
45.
Rydin, Y. (in press) 'Managing Urban Air Quality': language and rational choice in metropolitan governance, Environment and Planning A.
46.
Rydin, Y. and Myerson, G. (1989) Explaining and interpreting ideological effects: a rhetorical approach to green belts, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 7, pp. 463-479.
47.
Stew Art, J. (1995) A future for local authorities as community government, in: J. Stewart and G. Stoker (Eds) Local Government in the 1990s, pp. 249-268. London : Macmillan.
48.
Stewart, M. (1994) Between Whitehall and Town Hall: the realignment of urban regeneration policy in England, Policy and Politics , 22, pp.133-145.
49.
Stoker, G. (1989) Urban Development Corporations: a review, Regional Studies, 23, pp. 159-167
50.
Stoker, G. (1990) Regulation theory, local government and the transition from Fordism, in: D. King and J. Pierre (Eds) Challenges to Local Government , pp. 242-264. London: Sage.
51.
Stoker, G. and Mossberger, K. (1994) Urban regime theory in comparative perspective , Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 12, pp. 195-212.
52.
Strange, I. (1997) Directing the show? Business leaders, local partnership, and economic regeneration in Sheffield, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 15, pp. 1-17.
53.
Vickers, B. (1988) In Defence of Rhetoric. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
54.
Wilson, D. (1996) Metaphors, growth coalition discourses, and black poverty neighborhoods in a U.S. city, Antipode, 28, pp. 72-96.
