In the UK, there is a political consensus that a multi-sectoral partnership approach is essential to achieve urban regeneration. As a term, however, 'partnership' is overused, ambiguous and politicised. The Conservative government has inscribed 'partnership' with a complex political agenda. It is not clear whether the politics of partnership are still dominated by a Thatcherite agenda of privatising and centralising urban policy or whether a new, more democratic era has been entered. The paper explores how the stakeholders in the central government-led Scottish Urban Partnerships conceive of the nature of their interrelationships within this political context. It also presents a conceptualisation of partnership processes which extends and refines the framework put forward by Mackintosh (1992). The paper concludes that the Urban Partnerships are essentially limited applications of the potential of the partnership approach.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bailey, N., with Barker, A. and Macdonald, K. (1995) Partnership Agencies in British Urban Policy. London: UCL Press.
2.
Boyle, R. (1993) Changing partners: the experience of urban economic policy in West Central Scotland, 1980-90, Urban Studies, 30, pp. 309-324.
3.
Carley, M. (1990) Housing and Neighbourhood Renewal: Britain's New Urban Challenge. London: PSI.
4.
Castlemilk Partnership (1993) Procedures and Code of Conduct for the Meetings of the Partnership and Sub-groups . Glasgow: Castlemilk Partnership .
5.
Davoudi, S. and Healey, P. (1995) City Challenge: sustainable process or temporary gesture ?Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy , 13, pp. 79-95.
6.
Deakin, N. and Edwards, J. (1993) The Enterprise Culture and the Inner City. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
7.
Edwards, J. and Deakin, N. (1992) Privatism and partnership in urban regeneration , Public Administration, 70, pp. 359-368.
8.
De Groot, L. (1992) City Challenge: competing in the urban regeneration game, Local Economy, 7, pp. 196-209.
9.
Hambleton, R. and Thomas, H. (Eds) (1995) Urban Policy Evaluation: Challenge and Change. London: Paul Chapman .
10.
Hastings, A. and McArthur, A. (1995) A comparative assessment of government approaches to partnership with the local community, in: R. Hambleton and H. Thomas (Eds) Urban Policy Evaluation: Challenge and Change, pp. 175-193. London : Paul Chapman.
11.
Hmso (1988) Action for Cities . London: HMSO.
12.
Hmso (1992) City Challenge: Bidding Guidance 1993-94. London: HMSO.
13.
Hmso (1994) Draft Bidding Guidance: A Guide to Funding Under the Single Regeneration Budget. London: HMSO.
14.
Lawless, P. (1991) Urban policy in the Thatcher decade: English inner city policy, 1979-90, Environment and Planning C; Government and Policy, 9, pp. 15-30.
15.
Lloyd, M.G. and Newlands, D. (1989) Recent urban policy development in Scotland: the re-discovery of peripheral housing estates, Scottish Geographical Magazine, 105, 2, pp. 116-119.
16.
Macfarlane, R. (1993) Community Involvement in City Challenge: A Good Practice Guide. London: NCVO.
17.
Mackintosh, M. (1992) Partnership: issues of policy and negotiation, Local Economy, 7, pp. 210-224.
18.
Maclennan, D. (1987) Social housing in Western Europe: from solution to problem?Papers from the National Housing Conference . Dublin: An Foras Forbatha.
19.
Mccrone, G. (1991) Urban renewal: the Scottish experience, UrbanStudies, 28, pp. 919-938.
20.
McGregor, A., Kintrea, K., Fitzpatrick, I. and Urquart, A. (1995) Interim Evaluation of the Wester Hailes Partnership . Glasgow: Centre for Housing Research and Urban Studies.
21.
Oatley, N. (1995) Competitive urban policy and the regeneration game , Town Planning Review, 66, pp. 1-14.
22.
Oatley, N. and Lambert, C. (1995) Evaluating competitive urban policy: the city challenge initiative, in: R. Hambleton and H. Thomas (Eds) Urban Policy Evaluation: Challenge and Change, pp. 141-157. London: Paul Chapman .
23.
Pacione, M. (1989) The urban crisis: poverty and deprivation in the Scottish city, Scottish Geographical Magazine, 105, pp. 101-115.
24.
Pacione, M. (1992) Citizenship, partnership and the popular restructuring of UK urban space, Urban Geography, 13, pp. 405-421.
25.
Report Of The Commission For Social Justice ( 1994) Social Justice: Strategies for National Renewal. London: Vintage.
26.
Robson, B.T. ET AL. (1994) Assessing the Impact of Urban Policy. London: HMSO.
27.
The Scottish Office (1988) New Life for Urban Scotland. Edinburgh: The Scottish Office.
28.
The Scottish Office (1990) Urban Scotland into the 90s: New Life-Two Years On. Edinburgh : The Scottish Office.
29.
The Scottish Office (1993) Progress In Partnership: A Consultation Paper on the Future of Urban Regeneration Policy in Scotland. Edinburgh: The Scottish Office.
30.
The Scottish Office (1995) Programme for Partnership; Announcement of the Scottish Office Review of Urban Regeneration Policy. Edinburgh: The Scottish Office.
31.
Sheffield City Polytechnic (1991) City Challenge Working Paper-Some Preliminary Observations. Sheffield: Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield City Polytechn ic.
32.
Tye, R. and Williams, G. (1994) Urban regeneration and central-local government relations: the case of East Manchester, Progress in Planning , 42(1), (whole issue).
