This paper applies Kevin Lynch's famous thesis of legibility to the main street of Singapore—Orchard Road. It is primarily concerned with three issues. How legible is Orchard Road in the eyes of Singaporeans? Who find Orchard Road legible? If Orchard Road is legible to Singaporeans, why is it so? Based upon a combination of comprehensive questionnaire survey of Singaporeans and personal interviews with residents and businessmen operating in Orchard Road, this paper argues that the landscape of Orchard Road, known as the Orchardscape in this paper, is very legible to most Singaporeans. Its legibility is particularly prominent among those with higher education and higher income levels. There is also a distance-decay effect in the Singaporean cognition of the Orchardscape. The legibility of the Orchardscape is explained in relation to the personal and cultural background of individual Singaporeans and landscape cues. We argue that both sets of factors must be taken into consideration in understanding the image of the city. Some practical implications for future city design and planning are offered in the concluding section of the paper.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Appleyard, D. (1970) Styles and methods of structuring a city, Environment and Behavior, 2, pp. 100-116.
2.
Appleyard, D. (1979) The environment as a social symbol, Journal of the American Planning Association, 45, pp. 143-153.
3.
Appleyard, D. (1981) Livable Streets. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
Appleyard, D., Lynch, K. and Myer, J. (1967) The view from the road, in: D. LowEnthal (Ed.) Environmental Perception and Behavior , pp. 75-88. Research Paper No. 109, Department of Geography, University of Chicago.
5.
Arnheim, R. (1977) The Dynamics of Architectural Form. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
Bailly, A.S. (1993) Spatial imagery and geography: a plea for the geography of representations, GeoJournal31, pp. 247-250.
7.
Berger, J. (1987) Guidelines for landscape synthesis: some directions-old and new, Landscape and UrbanPlanning, 14, pp. 295-311.
8.
Boulding, K.E. (1956) The Image: Knowledge in Life and Society. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press .
9.
CosGRovE, D. and Daniels, S. (Eds) (1988) The Iconography of Landscape. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Del Rio, V. (1992) Urban design and conflicting city images of Brazil: Rio de Janeiro and Curitiba, Cities, November, pp. 270-279.
11.
Domosh, M. (1992) Urban imagery, Urban geography , 13, pp. 475-480.
12.
Downing, F. (1992) The role of place and event imagery in the act of design, Journal of Architectural and Planning Research , 9, pp. 64-80.
13.
Gosling, D. (1992) City imagery a summary, Cities , November, pp. 267-269.
14.
Heckscher, A. (1977) Open Spaces: The Life of American Cities. New York: Harper & Row.
15.
Heinemeyer, W.F. (1967) The urban core as a center of attraction, in: E. J. Brill (Ed.) Urban Core and Inner City, pp. 82-99. Netherlands: Leiden.
16.
Hull, R.B. (1992) Image congruity; place attachment and community design, Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 9, pp. 181-192.
17.
Hull, R.B., Lam, M. and Vigo, G. (1994) Place identity: symbols of self in the urban fabric , Landscape and Urban Planning, 28, pp. 109-120.
18.
Ira, V. and Kollar, D. (1994) Behavioural-geographical aspects of environm ental quality, GeoJournal, 32, pp. 221-224.
19.
Jacobs, J. (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage Books.
20.
Jakle, J.A. (1987) The Visual Elements of Landscape. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.
21.
Jenkins, J.M. and Walmsley, D.J. (1993) Mental maps of tourists: A study of CoffsHarbour, New South Wales, GeoJournal , 29, pp. 233-241.
22.
Kaplan, S. (1973) Cognitive maps, human needs and the designed environment , in: W. F. E. Preiser (Ed.) Environmental Design Research, pp. 275-283. Stroudsbury, PA : Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross.
23.
Kaplan, S. (1987) Aesthetics, affect, and cognition: environmental preference from an evolutionary perspective, Environment and Behavior, 19, pp. 3-32.
24.
Karan, P.P. and Bladen, W.A. (1982) Perceptions of the urban environm ent in a third world country, Geographical Review, 92, pp. 228-232.
25.
Kates, R.W. (1987) The human environment: the road not taken, the road still beckoning, Annals, Association of American Geographers , 77, pp. 525-534.
26.
Kempley, R. (1994) Led astray in Leeds, Landscape Design, 230, pp. 29-31.
27.
Kobayashi, A. (1989) A critique of dialectical landscape, in: A. Kobayashi and S. Mackenzie (Eds) Remaking Human Geography, pp. 164-183. Boston : Unwin Hyman.
28.
Lang, J. (1988) Symbolic aesthetics in architecture: toward a research agenda, in: J. L. Nasar (Ed.) Environmental Aesthetics: Theory, Research, and Applications, pp. 11-26. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Ley, D. ( 1985) Cultural/humanistic geography, Progress in Human Geography, 9, pp. 415-423.
30.
Livingstone, D.N., Powell, J.M. and Lowenthal, D. (1994) Classics in human geography revisited, Progress in Human Geography, 18, pp. 209-215.
31.
Lowenthal, D. (1961) Geography, experience, and imagination: towards a geographical epistemology, Annals, Association of American Geographers, 51, pp. 241-260.
32.
Lynch, K. (1960) The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
Lynch, K. (1976a) Managing the Sense of a Region. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
Lynch, K. (1976b) Foreword, in: G. T. Moore and R. G. Golledge (Eds) Environmental Knowing, pp. v-viii. Stroudsbury, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.
35.
Lynch, K. (1984) Reconsidering The Image of the City, in: L. Rodwin and R. M. Hollister (Eds) Cities of the Mind: Images and Themes of the City in the Social Sciences, pp. 151-161. New York: Plenum Press.
36.
Ministry Of Communications And Information (n.d.) Singapore 1990. Singapore: MCI.
37.
Mitchell, B. (1989) Geography and Resource Analysis. Essex, UK: Longman.
38.
Nasar, J.L. (1988) Perception and evaluation of street scenes, in: J. L. Nasar (Ed.) Environmental Aesthetics: Theory, Research, and Applications, pp. 275-289. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Nasar, J.L. (1990) The evaluative image of the city, Journal of the American Planning Association, 56, pp. 41-53.
40.
Nasar, J.L. (1994) Urban design aesthetics: the evaluative qualities of building exteriors, Environment and Behavior, 26, pp. 377-401.
41.
Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980) Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture . New York: Rizzoli.
42.
Piaget, J. (1954) The Child's Construction of Reality. New York: Basic Books.
43.
Pocock, D.C.D. (1971) Urban environmental perception and behaviour: a review, Tijdschrift voor Economistle en SocialeGeografie , 63, pp. 321-326.
44.
Pocock, D.C.D. (1976) Some characteristics of mental maps: an empirical study, Transactions, Institute of British Geographers, 1, pp. 493-512.
45.
Pocock, D.C.D. (1989) Humankind-environment: musings on the role of the hypen, in: F. W. Boal and D. N. LivingsTone (Eds) The Behavioural Environment: Essays in Reflection, Application and Re-evaluation, pp. 82-90. London: Routledge.
46.
Purcell, A.T. (1992) Abstract and specific physical attributes and the experience of landscape, Journal of EnvironmentalManagement , 34, pp. 159-177.
47.
Rapoport, A. (1984) Culture and the urban order, in: J. A. Agnew, J. Mercer and D. E. Sopher (Eds) The City in Cultural Context, pp. 50-75. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
48.
Relph, E. (1989) Responsive methods, geographical imagination and the study of landscapes, in: A. Kobayashi and S. Mackenzie (Eds) Remaking Human Geography, pp. 149-163. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
49.
Revelle, P. and Revelle, C. (1981) The Environment: Issues and Choices for Society . Boston: William Grant Press .
50.
Romann, M. (1989) Divided perception in a united city: the case of Jerusalem, in: F. W. Boal and D. N. Living Stone (Eds) The Behavioural Environment: Essays in Reflection, Application and Re-evaluation, pp. 182-201. London : Routledge.
51.
Saarinen, T. and Husband, E. (1982) Environmental perception: international efforts , Progress in Human Geography, 6, pp. 515-546.
52.
Sholl M.J. (1992) Landmarks, places, environments: multiple mind-brain systems for spatial orientation, Geoforum, 23, pp. 151-164.
53.
Smith, P. (1988) Complexity, order and an architectural aesthetic , in: D. Canter, M. Krampen and D. Stea (Eds.) Environmental Perspectives, pp. 200-214. Aldershot : Avebury.
54.
Spector, A.N. (1982) Towards integrating a model of urban socio-economic structure and urban imagery, Environment and Planning A, 14, pp. 765-787.
55.
Tuan, Y.F. (1975) Images and mental maps, Annals, Association of American Geographers, 65, pp. 205-213.
56.
Tuan, Y.F. (1990) Realism and fantasy in art, history, and geography , Annals, Association of American Geographers, 80, pp. 435-446.
57.
Yeung, H. W. C and Savage, V.R. (1995) The Singaporean image of the Orchardscape, in: B. S. A. Yeoh and L. Kong (Eds) Portrait of Places. Singapore : Times Edition.
