In the social sciences, and particularly in gentrification research, there seems to be a persistent fascination with, and an urge to pursue a course towards synthesising, integrating or uniting very different approaches into a single comprehensive explanation. One concept often raised in this context is complementarity (associated with Bohr's 'Copenhagen interpretation' of quantum mechanics), though usually in an unreflective and uncritical manner. The purposes of this paper are to outline the concept of complementarity; to clarify what we should be careful not to ascribe to the concept; and to provide a rough sketch of what a Copenhagen interpretation of gentrification would involve. It is argued that while it is a worthy task to strive for integration and synthesis in comprehensive thick descriptions, we will have to accept that the theoretical bases for our understanding of various aspects included in these studies may not be so easy to unite into one unambiguous and internally consistent theoretical construct.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, P. (1956) Complementary descriptions, Mind , 65, pp. 145-165.
2.
Bassett, K. and Short, J. (1989) Development and diversity in urban geography, in: D. Gregory and R. Walford (Eds) Horizons in Human Geography, pp. 175-193. London : Macmillan.
3.
Beauregard, R. (1986) The chaos and complexity of gentrification, in: N. Smith and P. Williams (Eds) Gentrification of the City. Boston: Allen and Unwin.
4.
Bedau, H. and Oppenheim, P. (1961) Complementarity in quantum mechanics: a logical analysis, Synthese, 13, 201-232.
5.
Blackburn, T. (1971) Sensuous-intellectual complementarity in science , Science, 172, 1003-1007.
6.
Blaedel, N. (1985) Harmoni og enhed: Niels Bohr en biografi. Copenhagen: Rhodos.
7.
Bohr, N. (1948) On the notions of causality and complementarity , Dialectica, 2, 312-319.
8.
Bohr, N. (1958) Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
9.
Bohr, N. (1961) Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Bohr, N. (1963) Essays 1958-1962 on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge . New York: Interscience.
11.
Bondi, L. (1991) Gender divisions and gentrification: a critique , Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, NS, 16, 190-198.
12.
Bourassa, S. (1993) The rent gap debunked, UrbanStudies , 30, 1731-1744.
13.
Brante, T. (1980) Vetenskapens struktur och förändring. Lund: Doxa.
14.
Brody, N. and Oppenheim, P. (1969) Application of Bohr's principle of complementarity to the mind-body problem, Journal of Philosophy, 66, 97-113.
15.
Clark, E. (1988) The rent gap and transformation of the built environment: case studies in Malmo 1860-1985, Geografiska Annaler, 70B, 241-254.
16.
Clark, E. (1992a) On gaps in gentrification theory, Housing Studies, 7, 16-26.
17.
Clark, E. (1992b) On blindness, centrepieces and complementarity in gentrification theory, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, NS, 17, 358-362.
18.
Faye, J. and Folse, H. (Eds) (1994) Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
19.
Feyerabend, P. (1958) Complementarity, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 32, 75-104.
20.
Feyerabend, P. (1968) On a recent critique of complementarity: part I , Philosophy of Science, 35, 309-331.
21.
Feyerabend, P. (1969) On a recent critique of complementarity: part II , Philosophy of Science, 36, 82-105.
22.
Folse, H. (1985) The Philosophy of Niels Bohr: The Framework of Complementarity. Amsterdam: North-Holland .
23.
Folse, H. (1994) Bohr's framework of complementarity and the realism debate, in: J. Faye and H. Folse (Eds) Niels Bohr and ContemporaryPhilosophy, pp. 119-139.
24.
Gale, D. (1987) Review of Gentrification and the City, Journal of the American Planning Association, 53, 135-136.
25.
Hamnett, C. (1984) Gentrification and residential location theory: a review and assessment, in: D. Herbert and R. Johnston (Eds) Geography and the Urban Environment: Progress in Research and Applications, 4, 282-319. Chichester: Wiley.
26.
Hamnett, C. (1991) The blind men and the elephant: the explanation of gentrification, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, NS, 16, 173-189.
27.
Hiley, B. and Peat, F. (Eds) (1987) Quantum Implications: Essays in Honour of David Bohm. London: Routledge.
28.
Holton, G. (1970) The roots of complementarity, Daedalus, 99, 1015-1055.
29.
Holton, G. (1988) Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
30.
Honner, J. (1987) The Description of Nature: Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Quantum Physics. Oxford: Clarendon .
31.
Honner, J. (1994) Description and deconstruction: Niels Bohr and modem philosophy, in: J. Faye and H. Folse (Eds) Niels Bohr and ContemporaryPhilosophy, pp. 141-153.
32.
Hooker, C. (1972) The nature of quantum mechanical reality: Einstein versus Bohr, in: R. Colodny (Ed.) Paradigms and paradoxes, pp. 67-302. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
33.
Jackson, P. (1991) Mapping meanings: a cultural critique of locality studies, Environment and Planning A, 23, 215-228.
34.
Kalckar, J. (1985) Det inkommensurable. Copenhagen : Rhodos.
35.
Koch, S. (1981) The nature and limits of psychological knowledge: lessons of a century qua 'science', American Psychologist , 36, 257-269.
36.
Ley, D. ( 1986) Alternative explanations for inner-city gentrification: a Canadian assessment, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 76, 521-535.
37.
McKay, D. (1957) Complementary descriptions, Mind , 66, 390-394.
38.
McKay, D. (1958) Complementarity, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 32, 105-122.
39.
Mermin, D. (1989) Review of The philosophical writings of Niels Bohr, PhysicsToday, 42, p. 105.
40.
Pais, A. (1991) Niels Bohr's Times, in Physics, Philosophy and Polity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
41.
Petersen, A. (1963) The philosophy of Niels Bohr, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, September 8-14.
42.
Richards, I. (1976) Complementarities: Uncollected essays, ed. by J. Russo, Manchester : Carcanet.
43.
Rose, D. (1989) A feminist perspective of employment restructuring and gentrification: the case of Montreal, in: J. Wolch and M. Dear (Eds) The Power of Geography. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
44.
Rosenfeld, L. (1963) Niels Bohr's contribution to epistemology, PhysicsToday, 16(10) 47-54.
45.
Rozental, S. (Ed.) (1967) Niels Bohr: His Life and Work as seen by his Friends and Colleagues. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
46.
Sayer, A. (1989) On the dialogue between humanism and historical materialism in geography, in: A. Kobayashi and S. Mackenzie (Eds) Remaking Human Geography, pp. 206-226. London: Unwin Hyman.
47.
Sayer, A. (1991) Behind the locality debate: deconstructing geography's dualisms, Environment and Planning A, 23, 283-308.
48.
Sayer, A. (1992) Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach, 2nd edn. London: Routledge .
49.
Smith, S. (1984) Practising humanistic geography, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 74, 353-374.
50.
Vigier, J.-P., Dewdney, C., Holland, P. and Kyprianidis, A. (1987) Causal particle trajectories and the interpretation of quantum mechanics, in: B. Hiley and F. Peat (Eds), Quantum Implications: Essays in Honour of David Bohm, pp. 169-204.
51.
Warde, A. (1991) Gentrification as consumption: issues of class and gender, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space , 9, 223-232.
52.
Wessel, T. (1988) Gentrification som forskningsfelt-utviklingen av et samfunnsteoretisk mikrokosmos, Nordisk Samhällsgeografisk Tidskrift, 8, 39-55.
53.
Wittberg, P. (1992) Perspectives on gentrification: a comparative review of the literature, Research in UrbanSociology, 2, 17-46.
54.
Zukin, S. (1987) Gentrification: culture and capital in the urban core, American Review of Sociology, 13, 129-147.
