This paper analyses the determinants of household formation in a large metropolitan city (Karachi) in a low-income, developing country (Pakistan) by comparing the sample characteristics of nuclear households with those of 'nuclei' within joint households. Contrary to expectations, the results indicate the lack of influence of income and education. The primary impetus to the creation of new households is provided by new migrants, by working women and by the number of dependants.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ahmad, N. (1991) Intra-urban residential mobility in the city of Karachi. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.
2.
Applied Economics Research Centre (1988) Socio-economic Profile of Planned Areas in Karachi. University of Karachi.
3.
Applied Economics Research Centre (1989) Housing Affordability in Karachi. University of Karachi .
4.
Applied Economics Research Centre (1991) Interim Report, Vol. I: Metropolitan Resource Generation Study. University of Karachi.
5.
Borsch-Supan, A. (1986) Household formation, housing prices and public policy impacts, Journal of Public Economics, 30, pp. 145-164.
6.
Campbell, B.O. (1963) Long swings in residential construction: the postwar experience, American Economic Review, 53, pp. 508-518.
7.
Ermisch, J.F. (1981) An econometric theory of household formation, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 28, pp. 1-9.
8.
Federal Bureau Of Statistics (1988-89) Household Income and Expenditure Survey (HIES). Statistics Division, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad .
9.
Ghaus, A. and Pasha, H.A. (1991) Magnitude of the housing shortage in Pakistan, Pakistan Development Review, 29(2), pp. 137-153.
10.
Gordon, R.A. (1956) Population growth, housing and the capital coefficient , American Economic Review, 46, pp. 307-322.
11.
Grebler, L., Blank, D.M. and Winnick, L. (1956) Capital Formation in Residential Real Estate: Trends and Prospects. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
Heckman, J.J. (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error , Econometrica, 47, pp. 153-161.
13.
Hickman, B.G. (1974) What became of the building cycle?, in: P. A. David and M. W. Reder (Eds) Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honour of Moses Abramovitz. New York: Academic Press.
14.
Kent, R.J. (1983) The relationship between income and price elasticities in studies of housing demand, tenure choice and household formation, Journal of Urban Economics, 13, pp. 196-204.
15.
Kobrin, F.E. (1973) Household headship and its changes in the United States 1940-60, Journal of the American Statistical Association,68, pp. 793-880.
16.
Kobrin, F.E. (1976) The fall in household size and the rise of the primary individual in the United States, Demography, 13, pp. 127-138.
17.
Maisel, S.J. (1960) Changes in the rate and components of household formation, Journal ofAmerican Statistical Association,55, pp. 268-283.
18.
Nuzhat, A. (1991) Intra-urban residential mobility in the city of Karachi. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.
19.
Pitkin, J. and Masnick, G. (1983) The relationship between heads and non-heads in the household population: an extension of the headship rate methods, in: J. Pitkin and G. Masnick (Eds) Family Demography: Methods and Their Application. Joint Centre for Urban Studies ofMIT and Harvard University, Cam-bridge, MA.
20.
Population Census ORGANIZATION (1961) Census Report of Pakistan. Statistics Division, Government of Pakistan , Islamabad.
21.
Population Census ORGANIZATION (1972) Census Report of Pakistan. Statistics Division, Government of Pakistan , Islamabad.
22.
Population Census ORGANIZATION (1982) Census Report of Pakistan. Statistics Division, Government of Pakistan , Islamabad.
23.
Smith, L.B., Rosen, K.T., Markandya, A. and Ullmo, P.A. (1984) The demand for housing, household formation: an international analysis, UrbanStudies, 25, pp. 407-414.
24.
World Bank (1989) Development Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.
