Bailey, S.J. (1989) Charging for public library services, Policy and Politics, 17, pp. 59-74.
2.
Bailey, S.J. (1990) Charges for local infrastructure, Town Planning Review, 61, pp. 427-453.
3.
Bailey, S.J. (1991) Fiscal stress: The new system of local government finance in England UrbanStudies, 28, pp. 889-907.
4.
Bailey, S.J. (1993) Public choice theory and the reform of local government in Britain: From government to governance, Public Policy and Administration, 8, pp. 7-24.
5.
Bailey, S.J. (1994) Charging for local government services: A coherent philosophy. Public Administration, 72 (forthcoming).
6.
Bailey, S.J. and Paddison, R. (1988) The Reform of Local Government Finance in Britain . London: Routledge.
7.
Bailey, S.J., Falconer, P.K. and Mcchlery, S. (1993) Local Government Charges: Policy and Practice. Harlow: Longmans.
8.
Baumol, W.J. and Bradford, D.F. (1970) Optimal departures from marginal cost pricing, American Economic Review, 60, pp. 265-283.
9.
Bennett, R.J. (1980) The Geography of Public Finance. London: Methuen.
10.
Bird, R.M. (1976) Charging for Public Services: A New Look at an Old Idea. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.
11.
Cm 324 (1988) Financing Our Public Library Service; Four Subjects For Debate. London : HMSO.
12.
Cml (1983) Municipal Services and User Charges in Colorado. Denver: Colorado Municipal League.
13.
Cmnd 6453 (1976) Local Government Finance: Report of the Committee of Enquiry (The Layfield Report). London: HMSO.
14.
Cmnd 9714 (1986) Paying for Local Govemment. London: HMSO.
15.
Criz, M. (1982) The role of user charges and fees in city finance , Urban Data Service Reports, 14(6). Washington, DC: International City Management Association, June.
16.
DoE (1981) Local Government Financial Statistics: England and Wales 1979/80. Department of the Environment. London: HMSO.
17.
DoE (1991) Local Government Financial Statistics: England No 2, 1990. London: Department of the Environment.
18.
Dtp (1993) London Congestion Charging: A Review of Technology for Road Use Pricing in London. London: Department of Transport.
19.
Elcock, H., Jordan, G. and Midwinter, A. (1989) Budgeting in Local Government: Managing the Margins . Harlow: Longman.
20.
Feldstein, M.S. (1972) Pricing and efficiency in public sector pricing: The optimal two part tariff, Quarterly Journal of Economics , 86, pp. 175-187.
21.
Flynn, C.L. et al. (1981) Using User Fees: A Guide for Massachusetts Cities and Towns SP-129. Local Government Series Community Resource Development Program. Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts and Massachusetts Municipal Association.
22.
Frenckner, P. (1989) Costs of using capital and determination of net income in capital intensive firms, in: B. Fridman and L. Ostman (Eds) Accounting Development: Some Perspectives, pp. 133-149. Stockholm : Ekonomiska Forskningsinstitutet.
23.
Galbraith, J.K. (1967) The New Industrial State. New York: New American Library.
Galbraith, J.K. (1973) Economics and the Public Purpose. London: Andre Deutsch.
26.
Glasby, J. (1981) Principles of charging in local government, Public Finance andAccountancy, February, pp. 13-14.
27.
Harris, R. and Seldon, A. (1976) Pricing or taxing. IEAHobart Paper 71, Institute of Economic Affairs, London.
28.
Heald, D. (1983) Public Expenditure: Its Defence and Reform. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
29.
Heald, D. (1990) Charging by British government: Evidence from the public expenditure survey, Financial Accountability and Management , 6, pp. 229-261.
30.
Johnson, D.N. (1980) The use of service charges and fees to finance local government in Oregon: An overview. Finance Bulletin, No. 10, Bureau of Governmental Research and Service School of Community Service and Public Affairs, University of Oregon.
31.
Logalbo, A.T. (1982) Responding to tax limitation: Finding alternative revenues, GovernmentalFinance, 11, pp. 13-19.
32.
Losch, A. (1954) The Economics of Location. New Haven: Yale University Press.
33.
Mccarthy, K. ET AL. (1984) Exploring Benefit Based Finance for Local Government Services: Must User Charges Harm the Disadvantaged?Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services . July.
34.
McKay, D.H. (1985) A reappraisal of public choice theory of intergovernmental relations, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy , 3, pp. 163-174.
35.
Mercer, L.T. ET AL. (1985) California City and County User Charges: Change and Efficiency Since Proposition 13. Berkeley: Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California.
36.
Morgan, W.D. and Mercer, L.T. (1981) City and county user charges in California: Options, performance and criteria. California Policy Seminar No. 12. Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California , Berkeley.
37.
Mushkin, S.J. and Vehorn, C.L. (1977) User fees and charges, GovernmentalFinance, 6, November, pp. 42-48.
38.
Nelson, R.H. (1987) The economics profession and the making of public policy, Journal of Economic Literature, 25, pp. 49-91.
39.
Netzer, D. (1983) Local alternatives to the property tax: user charges and non-property taxes.Working Paper No 4, Tax Analysis Series, Academy for State and Local Government, Washington, DC. December.
40.
Oates, W.E. (1969) The effects of property taxes and local public spending on property values: An emprical study of tax capitalisation and the Tiebout hypothesis, Journal of Political Economy, 77, pp. 957-971.
41.
Oecd (1992) Revenue Statistics of OECD Member Countries, 1965-1991. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
42.
Olson, M. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cam-bridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
Olson, M. (1982) The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation and Social Rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press.
44.
Olson, M. (1986) A theory of the incentives facing political organisations: neo corporatism and the hegemonic state, International Political Science Review, 7, pp. 165-189.
45.
Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1992) Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
46.
Paddison, R. and Bailey, S.J. (1988) Local Government Finance: International Perspectives . London: Routledge.
47.
Palmer, A.J. (1992) Practical consequences of the theory of public choice: the role of the Audit Commission as a control device. Working Papers in Economics No. 2, University of the West of England, Bristol.
48.
Prest, A.R. (1982) On charging for local government services, The Three Banks Review, 133, pp. 3-23.
49.
Rose, R. (1990) Charging for public services, Public Administration, 68, pp. 297-313.
50.
Rose, R. and Falconer, P. (1992) Individual taste or collective decision: Public policy on school meals, Journal of Social Policy, 21, pp. 349-373.
51.
Sachs, S. and Andrew, R.K. (1975) User charges and special districts, in: J. R. Aronson and E. Schwartz (Eds) Management Policies in Local Government Finance , pp. 166-183. Washington: International City Management Association .
52.
Sharpe, L.J. and Newton, K. (1984) Does Politics Matter? The Determinants of Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53.
Smith, B. (1986) Cost Savings in Ontario Municipalities. London: Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy .
Tacir (1981) Municipal Current Charges and Alternative Revenue Sources. Austin: Texas Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.
56.
Tiebout, C.M. (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures, Journal of Political Economy, 64, pp. 416-424.
57.
Toft, G.S. and Warnecke, B.J. (1980) Local revenue diversification with user fees in Indiana. Research Report 80-3, Centre for Public Policy and Public Administration . Purdue University, Indiana. July.
58.
Trotter, S.D. (1985) The price discriminating public enterprise, with special reference to British Rail, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 19 pp. 41-55.
59.
Wagner, R.E. (1991) Charging for Govemment: User Charges and Earmarked Taxes in Principle and Practice. London: Routledge.
