We empirically examine the relationship between public capital and municipal employment levels and changes using a sample of 48 large US cities during the 1970-80 period. We find greater stocks of public capital are associated with a higher demand for and supply of municipal workers. Holding all other factors constant, the effect of a 10 per cent greater level of per capita public capital stock is a 0.6 and 12.9 per cent higher demand for and supply of municipal workers in the short run. Reduced form estimates indicate a net positive effect on municipal employment but no net effect on municipal wages. These findings are supported by a fixed-effect model estimation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aaron, H.J. (1990) Discussion of 'Why is infrastructure important? ', in: A. H. Munnell (Ed.) Is There a Shortfall in Public Capital Investment ?, pp. 51-63. Boston : Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
2.
Blackley, P. and Deboer, L. (1991) The structure of state and local government production , Public Finance Quarterly, 19, pp. 147-165.
3.
Borcherding, T. and Deacon, R. (1972) The demand for services of non-federal governments , American Economic Review, 62, pp. 891-901.
4.
Deno, K. and Mehay, S. (1987) Municipal management structure and fiscal performance: Do city managers make a difference?Southern Economic Journal , 53, pp. 627-642.
5.
Ehrenberg, R. and Goldstein, G. (1975) A model of public sector wage determination, Journal of Urban Economics, 2, pp. 223-245.
6.
Getz, M. (1979) The Economics of the Urban Fire Department. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
7.
Gonzalez, R. and Mehay, S. (1985) Bureaucracy and the divisibility of local public output, Public Choice, 45, pp. 89-101.
8.
Gonzalez, R. and Mehay, S. (1991) Municipal government political structure and the power of special interest groups. Paper presented to the National Social Science Association Conference, Portland, OR, April.
9.
Huckins, L.E. (1989) Capital labor substitution in municipal government , Public Finance Quarterly, 17, pp. 357-374.
10.
Nadiri, M.I. and Rosen, S. (1974) A Disequilibrium Model for Factors of Production . New York: National Bureau of Economics Research.
11.
Oates, W. (1981) On local finance and the Tiebout model, The American Economic Review, 71, pp. 93-98.
12.
Oates, W. (1988) On the measurement of congestion in the provision of local public goods, Journal of Urban Economics, 24, pp. 85-94.
13.
Orzechowski, W. (1977) Economic models of bureaucracy: Survey, extensions, and evidence, in: T. Borcherding (Ed.) Budgets and Bureaucrats., pp. 229-259. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
14.
Tatom, J. (1991) Public capital and private sector performance, Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Review, 73, pp. 3-15.
15.
Tiebout, C. (1956) A pure theory of local expenditure, Journal of Political Economy, 64, pp. 416-24.
16.
Us Bureau Of The Census (1992) City Government Finances in 1989-90. Series GF-90-4. Washington, DC: USGPO.
17.
Us Department Of Labor (1969) Capital Stock Estimates for Input-Output Industries: Methods and Data. Bureau of Labor Statistics Bulletin 2034, Washington; DC: USGPO.
