A variety of segregation measures have been proposed in the literature with the dissimilarity index and its variants being the most widely applied. While these measures provide a quick means of comparing segregation patterns across space and time, they are not linked to the processes that generate and maintain segregative patterns. This paper proposes a new method for measuring segregation. The method is based on comparative evaluations of neighbourhood characteristics as a determinant of spatial behaviour in cities. The proposed approach moves away from a purely geometric interpretation of segregation by anchoring the measurement of segregation into the actual urban setting. The method's main advantages are its responsiveness to changes in urban characteristics (e.g. spatial variations in rent increases), and changes in preference structures (e.g. a declining importance of distance as an impediment to relocation). A numerical example is used to demonstrate the behaviour of the proposed method against traditional segregation measures. The results indicate that the segregation experiences of minorities may be more severe than previously thought.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Clark, W.A.V. (1986) Residential segregation in American cities: a review and interpretation, Population Research and Policy Review , 5, pp. 95-127.
2.
Clark, W.A.V. (1989) Residential segregation in American cities: common ground and differences in interpretation, Population Research and Policy Review, 8, pp. 193-197.
3.
Clark, W.A.V. (1991) Residential preferences and neighborhood racial segregation: a test of the Schelling segregation model, Demography , 28, pp. 1-19.
4.
Clark, W.A.V. and Onaka, J. (1985) An empirical test of a joint model of residential mobility and housing choice, Environment and Planning A, 17, pp. 915-930.
5.
Darden, J. (1987) Choosing neighbors and neighborhoods: the role of race in housing preference, in: G. Tobin (Ed.) Divided Neighborhoods: The Changing Patterns of Racial Segregation, pp. 15-42. Urban Affairs Annual Review 32. Newbury Park: Sage .
6.
Duncan, O. and Duncan, B. (1955) A methodological analysis of segregation indexes , American Sociological Review, 20, pp. 210-217.
7.
Elgie, R.A. (1979) The segregation of socio-economic groups in urban areas: a comment, UrbanStudies, 16, pp. 191-195.
8.
Falk, F.R., Cortese, C.F. and Cohen, J. (1978) Utilizing standardized indices of residential segregation: comment on Winship, Social Forces, 56, pp. 713-716.
9.
Fotheringham, A.S. and O'Kelly, M.E. (1989) Spatial Interaction Models: Formulation and Applications. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
10.
Galster, G. (1987) Residential segregation and interracial economic disparities: a simultaneous equation approach, Journal of Urban Economics, 21, pp. 22-24.
11.
Huff, J.O. and Waldorf, B.S. (1988) A predictive model of residential mobility and residential segregation, Papers of the Regional Science Association , 65, pp. 59-77.
12.
Huff, J.O. and Waldorf, B.S. (1990) Geographic scale issues in the analysis of residential segregation. Paper presented at the IGU Advanced Workshop on Mathematical Models, Boston, MA, November.
13.
Hughes, M.A. (1989) Misspeaking truth to power: a geographical perspective on the 'underclass' fallacy, Economic Geography, 65, pp. 187-207.
14.
Hughes, M.A. (1990) Formation of the impacted ghetto: evidence from large metropolitan areas, 1970-1980, Urban Geography, 11, pp. 265-284.
15.
Jakubs, J.F. (1979) A consistent conceptual definition of the index of dissimilarity, Geographical Analysis, 11, pp. 315-321.
16.
Jakubs, J.F. (1981) A distance-based segregation index, Socio-Economic Planning Science, 15, pp. 129-136.
17.
Kestenbaum, B. (1980) Notes on the index of dissimilarity: a research note, Social Forces, 58, pp. 275-280.
18.
Lieberson, S. (1981) An asymmetrical approach to segregation, in: C. Peach, V, Robinson and S. Smith (Eds) Ethnic Segregation in Cities, pp. 61-82. London: Croom Helm.
19.
Massey, D. and Denton, N. (1989) Hypersegregation in U.S. metropolitan areas: black and Hispanic segregation along five dimensions, Demography , 26, pp. 373-391.
20.
McFadden, D. (1973) Modelling the choice of residential location, in: A. Karlqvist, L. Ludqvist, F. Snickars and J. W. Weibull (Eds) Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models, pp. 75-96. Amsterdam: North Holland.
21.
Morgan, B.S. (1983a) An alternate approach to the development of a distance-based measure of racial segregation, American Journal of Sociology, 88, pp. 1237-1249.
22.
Morgan, B.S. (1983b) A distance-decay based interaction index to measure residential segregation, Area, 15, pp. 211-217.
23.
Morrill, R.L. (1991) On the measure of segregation, Geography Research Forum, 11, pp. 25-36.
24.
Onaka, J. and Clark, W.A.V. (1983) A disaggregate model of residential mobility and housing search, Geographical Analysis, 15, pp. 287-304.
25.
Peach, C. (1981) Conflicting interpretation of segregation, in: P. Jackson and S. Smith (Eds) Social Interaction and Ethnic Segregation , pp. 19-33. London: Academic Press.
26.
Schelling, T. (1971) Dynamic models of segregation, Journal of MathematicalSociology, 1, pp. 143-186.
27.
Thomas, R.W. (1981) Information Statistics in Geography. CATMOG 31 . Norwich: Geo Books.
28.
Waldorf, B.S. (1990) Housing policy impacts on ethnic segregation patterns: evidence from Düsseldorf, West Germany, UrbanStudies, 27, pp. 637-652.
29.
White, M.J. (1983) The measurement of spatial segregation, American Journal of Sociology, 88, pp. 1008-1066.
30.
Wilson, W.J. (1987) The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
31.
Winship, C. (1977) A revaluation of indexes of residential segregation , Social Forces, 55, pp. 1058-1066.
32.
Winship, C. (1979) The desirability of using the index of dissimilarity or any adjustment of it for measuring segregation: reply to Falk, Cortese and Cohen, Social Forces, 57, pp. 717-720.
