Segregation is commonly measured by means of an index of dissimilarity. A recent 'boundary modified' version of the index was formulated. It was based upon the concept that segregation is a separation created by spatial structure imposed upon the social space and thus interaction between racial groups is limited. The index takes into account one of the spatial etements—contiguity—but ignores the others. This paper argues that the length of the common boundary between two areal units and the shape of the areal units are important spatial components in determining segregation. Thus, a family of segregation indices is derived by incorporating these spatial components and can be applied to various spatial configurations. One of the indices possesses a distinctive property which is useful for comparing segregation levels in regions of various scales.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Boyce, R.R. and Clark, W.A.V. (1964) The concept of shape in geography, Geographical Review, 54, pp. 561-572.
2.
Cliff, A.D. and Ord, J.K. (1981) Spatial Processes: Models and Applications. London: Pion Ltd.
3.
Dacey, M.F. (1968) A review of measures of contiguity for two- and K-color maps, in: B. J. L. Berry and D. F. Marble (Eds) Spatial Analysis: A Reader in Statistical Geography, pp. 479-490. Englewood Cliff : Prentice Hall.
4.
Duncan, D. and Duncan, B. (1955) A methodological analysis of segregation indexes , American Sociological Review, 20, pp. 210-217.
5.
Fotheringham, A.S. (1981) Spatial structure and distance decay parameters , Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 71, pp. 425-436.
6.
Fotheringham, A.S. and Webber, M. (1980) Spatial structure and the parameters of spatial interaction models, Geographical Analysis, 12, pp. 33-46.
7.
Geary, R.C. (1968) The contiguity ratio and statistical mapping, in: B. J. L. Berry and D. F. Marble (Eds) Spatial Analysis: A Reader in Statistical Geography, pp. 461-478. Englewood Cliff: Prentice Hall.
8.
Gould, P.R. (1969) Spatial diffusion. Resource Paper No. 4, Commission on College Geography, Association of American Geographers .
9.
Griffith, D.A. (1982) Geometry and spatial interaction, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 72, pp. 332-346.
10.
Jakubs, J.F. (1979) A consistent conceptual definition of the index of dissimilarity, Geographical Analysis, 11, pp. 315-321.
11.
Jakubs, J.F. (1981) A distance-based segregation index, Journal of Socio-economicPlanning Sciences, 15, pp. 129-141.
12.
Kennedy, S. and Tobler, W. (1983) Geographic interpolation, Geographical Analysis, 15, pp. 151-156.
13.
Massey, D.S. and Denton, N.A. (1988) The dimensions of residential segregation, Social Forces, 67, pp. 281-315.
14.
Morgan, B.S. (1983) An alternative approach to the development of a distance-based measure of racial segregation, American Journal of Sociology, 88, pp. 1237-1249.
15.
Morrill, R.L. (1991) On the measure of geographic segregation, Geography Research Forum, 11, pp. 25-36.
16.
Morrill, R.L. and Pitts, F.R. (1967) Marriage, migration, and the mean information field: a study in uniqueness and generality, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 57, pp. 401-422.
17.
Odland, J. (1988) Spatial Autocorrelation. Beverley Hills, Sage Publications.
18.
Pounds, N.J. (1963) Political Geography. New York : McGraw Hill.
19.
Taylor, P.J. (1971) Distances within shapes: an introduction to a family of finite frequency distributions, Geografiska Annaler, 53B, pp. 40-53.
20.
White, M.J. (1983) The measurement of spatial segregation, American Journal of Sociology, 88, pp. 1008-1018.
