This paper analyses the characteristics of housing demand in the formal and informal housing markets of a large metropolitan city (Karachi) in a developing country (Pakistan) with low per capita incomes. While results of earlier research are confirmed in the case of the formal housing market, the explanatory power of the conventional housing demand specification is very limited in the informal sector. This is attributed to the impact of outward remittances by migrants, imperfections in the housing credit market, the low level of provision of public goods and differences in housing preferences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Applied Economics Research Centre (1989) Housing and Housing Users Survey. Karachi: University of Karachi.
2.
Bengali, K., Ghaus, A. and Pasha, H.A. (1989) Issues in municipal finance and management, Regional Development Dialogue, pp. 81-103.
3.
Box, G.E.P. and Cox, D.R. (1964) An analysis of transformations, Journal of Royal Statistical Society, B26, pp. 211-243.
4.
Cameron, T.A. (1986) Permanent and transitory income in models of housing demand, Journal of Urban Economics, 20, pp. 205-210.
5.
Follain, J., Lim, G. and Renaud, B. (1980) The demand for housing in developing countries: the case of Korea, Journal of Urban Economics, 7, pp. 315-336.
6.
Friedman, M. (1957) A Theory of Consumption Function. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
Goodman, A.C. (1988) An econometric model of housing price, permanent income, tenure choice, and housing demand, Journal of Urban Economics, 23, pp. 327-353.
8.
Goodman, A.C. and Kawai, M. (1986) Functional form, sample selection and housing demand , Journal of Urban Economics, 20, pp. 155-167.
9.
Grootaert, C. and Dubois, J. (1988) Tenancy choice and the demand for rental housing in the cities of Ivory Coast, Journal of Urban Economics, 24, pp. 44-63.
10.
Hall, R.E. (1978) Stochastic implication of life cycle-permanent income hypothesis: theory and evidence, Journal of Political Economy, 86, pp. 971-988.
11.
Henderson, J.V. and Ioannides, Y.M. (1983) A model of housing tenure choice, American Economic Review, 73, pp. 98-113.
12.
Ihlanfeld, K.R. (1982) Income elasticities of demand for rental housing: additional evidence, UrbanStudies, 19, pp. 65-69.
13.
Jimenez, E. (1984) Tenure security and urban squatting, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 66, pp. 556-567.
14.
Leeuw, F. (1971) The demand for housing: a review of cross-section evidence, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 53, pp. 1-10.
15.
Ludwig, R.L. and Cheema, G.S. (1987) Evaluating the impact of policies and projects: experience in urban shelter and basic services, Regional Development Dialogue, 8, pp. 190-229.
16.
Malpezzi, S. and Mayo, S. (1985) Housing demand in developing countries. Staff Working Paper No. 733, The World Bank, Washington, DC.
17.
Mayo, S. (1981) Theory and estimation in the econometrics of housing demand, Journal of Urban Economics, 10, pp. 95-116.
18.
Weiss, Y. (1978) Capital gains, discriminatory taxes and the choice between renting and owning a house, Journal of Public Economics , 10, pp. 45-56.
19.
World Bank (1989) Development Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.
