Contemporary provision of open spaces within cities rests largely on professional assumptions about its significance in the lives of residents. This paper presents results from the Greenwich Open Space Project which used qualitative research with four, in-depth discussion groups to determine the design of a questionnaire survey of households in the borough. The research shows that the most highly valued open spaces are those which enhance the positive qualities of urban life : variety of opportunities and physical settings; sociability and cultural diversity. The findings lend some support to the approach of the urban conservation movement but present a fundamental challenge to the open-space hierarchy embodied in the Greater London Development Plan. The Project identifies a great need for diversity of both natural settings and social facilities within local areas and highlights the potential of urban green space to improve the quality of life of all citizens.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abercrombie, M.J.L. (1983). 'The application of some principles of group analytic psychotherapy to higher education' in Pines, M. (ed.), The Evolution of Group Analysis. London: Routledge and Kean Paul, pp. 3-16.
2.
Bramley, W. (1986). Discussion on paper by Jacquelin Burgess. Group Analysis, Vol. 19, p. 244.
3.
Bradley, C. and Millward, A. (1986). 'Successful green-space — do we know it when we see it?' Landscape Research, Vol. 11, pp. 2-9.
4.
Burgess, J. and Harrison, C.M. (1989). 'Pale shadows for policy: the role of qualitative research in environmental planning' in Burgess, R. (ed.), Studies in Qualitative Methodology. London: JAI Press (in press).
5.
Burgess, J., Limb, M. and Harrison, C.M. (1988a). 'Exploring environmental values through the medium of small groups. Part one: theory and practice', Environment and Planning A, Vol. 20, pp. 309-326.
6.
Burgess, J., Limb, M. and Harrison. C.M. (1988b). 'Exploring environmental values through the medium of small groups. Part two: illustrations of a group at work. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 20, pp. 457-476.
7.
Burgess, R. (1984). In the Field: an Introduction to Field Research . Hemel Hempstead: Allen and Unwin .
Coalter, F., Long, J. and Duffield, B. (1986). Rationale for Public Sector Investment in Leisure . London: The Sports Council and Economic and Social Research Council.
10.
Cole, L. (1978). Nature Conservation in Urban Areas. Peterborough: Nature Conservancy Council.
11.
Coleman, A. (1985). Utopia on Trial. London: Hilary Shipman. Dower, M. (1984). 'Introduction: green towns and cities', The Planner , Vol. 70, pp. 11-15.
12.
Duffield, B. and Walker. S. (1983). Urban Parks and Open Spaces — a review. Tourism and Recreation Research Unit, Edinburgh. Published by the Sports Council and Social Science Research Council .
13.
Foulkes, S.H. (1964). Therapeutic Group Analysis. Hemel Hemstead: Allen and Unwin.
14.
Foulkes, S.H. (1975). Group Analytic Psychotherapy: methods and principles . London: Gordon and Breach.
15.
Fraser, J. (1984). 'The planner's contribution to the changing role of 'open space' in the inner city', The Planner, Vol. 70, pp. 45-50.
16.
Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Basic Books.
17.
GLC (1968). Surveys of the Use of Open Space: Vol. I. GLC Planning Department: Research Paper 2.
18.
GLC (1976). Greater London Development Plan. GLC.
19.
GLC (1985). 'Appendix 3: Ecological policies in the submitted alterations to the Greater London Development Plan (1984)' in Nature Conservation Guidelinesfor London. Ecology Handbook No. 3, GLC .
20.
GLC (1986). Open Space in London . GLC, Department of Recreation and the Arts: Habitat Handbook No. 2.
21.
Gold, J. R. and Burgess, J. (eds.) (1982). Valued Environments. Hemel Hempstead: Allen and Unwin.
22.
Goldsmith, B.F. (1989). 'Can popular values be derived from 33 people? ' in Burgess, R. (ed.), Studies in Qualitative Methodology. London: JAI Press (in press).
23.
Hall, A.C. (1987). 'The provision of private open space for dwellings ', Town Planning Review, Vol. 58, pp. 183-197.
24.
Harrison, C.M. (1983). 'Countryside recreation and London's urban fringe ', Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers , Vol. 8, pp. 295-313.
25.
Harrison, C.M., Limb, M., and Burgess, J. (1986). 'Recreation 2000: views of the country from the city', Landscape Research, Vol. 11, pp. 19-24.
26.
Harrison, C.M., Limb, M. and Burgess, J. (1987). 'Nature in the City - popular values for a living world', Journal of EnvironmentalManagement, Vol. 25, pp. 347-362.
27.
Hatchett, W. (1987). 'Thamesmead: the new model town', New Society, 20th November, pp. 9-10.
28.
Hough, M. (1984). City Form and Natural Process. London: Croom Helm.
29.
Jackson, J.B. (1978). 'The public park needs reappraisal' in Taylor, L. (ed.), Urban Open Spaces. London: Academy Editions , pp. 34-35.
30.
Jackson, J.B. (1984). Discovering the Vernacular Landscape. New Haven: Yale University Press.
31.
Kornblum, W. (1978). 'The Psychology of City Space' in Taylor, L. (ed.), Urban Open Spaces. London: Academy Editions , pp. 15-16.
32.
Laurie, I.C. (1979). Nature in Cities. Chichester : Wiley.
33.
Laurie, I.C. (1985). 'Public Parks and Spaces' in Harvey, S. and Rettig, S. (eds.), Fifty years of Landscape Design. London: The Landscape Press, pp. 63-78.
34.
Lowenthal, D. (1985). The Past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Limb, M. (1986). 'Community involvement in leisure provision — private enterprise or public interest?' in Coalter, F. (ed.), The Politics of Leisure. London: Leisure Studies Association.
36.
Lynch, K. and Hack, G. (1984). Site Planning (3rd Edition). London: The MIT Press.
37.
Mabey, R. (1980). The Common Ground. London: Hutchinson.
38.
Matthews, W.H. (1987). 'Gender, home and environmental cognition', Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers Vol. 12, pp. 43-56.
39.
Meinig, D. (ed.). (1979). The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
Micklewright, S. (1987). Who are the new conservationists? An analysis of the views and attitudes of the membership of two new Urban Trusts Discussion Paper in Conservation No. 46, Department of Biology, University College London.
41.
Newman, O. (1973). Defensible Space. New York : Macmillan.
42.
Pines, M. (ed.). (1983). The Evolution of Group Analysis. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
43.
Ulrich, R.S. (1977). 'Visual landscape preferences: a model and application ', Man-Environment Systems, Vol. 7, pp. 279-93.
44.
Veal, A.J. (1982). Planning for leisure: alternative approaches. Papers in Leisure Studies, Department of Extension Studies, Polytechnic of North London, No. 5.
45.
Wellman, J.D. and Buhyoff, G.J. (1980). 'Effects of regional familiarity on landscape preference', Journal of EnvironmentalManagement, Vol. 11, pp. 105-110.
46.
Whitaker, D.S. (1985). Using Groups to Help People. Andover: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
47.
Winning, A.L. (1986). 'Management of urban parks' in Bradshaw, A. D., Goode, D. A. and Thorpe, E. (eds.), Ecology and Design in Landscape. 24th Symposium of the British Ecological Society. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 261-274.
48.
Wyman, M. (1985). 'Nature experience and outdoor recreation planning ', Leisure Studies, Vol. 4: pp. 175-183.
