This paper explores different interpretations of the notion of equal standards in local public services, as applied to the systematic distribution of resources between localities. After discussing the context and goals of public resource distribution between territories, a typology of standards is defined and analysed in terms of simple microeconomic theory. From this analysis are drawn some conclusions about the applicability of different standards to different kinds of service and about systematic territorial distributional effects related to income and urban-rural character. The discussion is illustrated with examples drawn from United Kingdom systems including the Rate Support Grant. In the concluding section it is argued that standards should be explicit and that consistency with key value judgements should guide the choice of standards.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Audit Commission (1984a). Improving Economy, Effciency and Effectiveness in Local Government in England and Wales. London: Audit Commission for Local Authorities in England and Wales.
2.
Audit CoMmission (1984b). The Impact of Local Authorities' Economy, Efficiency and EJjectiveness of the Block Grant Distribution System. London: HMSO.
3.
Bailey, S. (1982). Central city decline and the provision of education services. Urban Studies, 19: 263-279.
4.
Barnett, R. and Topham N. (1980). A critique of equalising grants to local government . Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 27: 235-252.
5.
Bebbington, A. and Davies B. (1980). Territorial need indicators: a new approach. Journal of Social Policy, 9: 145-168 and 433-462.
6.
Bennett, B. (1982). Central Grants to Local Governments: The political and economic impact of the Rate Support Grant in England and Wales. Cambridge University Press.
7.
Bradshaw, J. (1972). The concept of social need. New Society, 19, 496: 640-3.
8.
Bramley, G. (1984). Grant-Related Expenditure and the inner city. Local Government Studies, 10.3: 15-38.
9.
Bramley, G. (1985). Grant-Related Expenditure and Recreation, SAUS Working Paper 51. Bristol: School for Advanced Urban Studies.
10.
Bramley, G., Leather, P. and Murie, A. (1980). Housing Strategies and Investment Programmes, SAUS Working Paper 7. Bristol: School for Advanced Urban Studies.
11.
Bramley, G. and Evans, A. (1981). Block Grant: some unresolved issues. Policy andPolitics, 9.2: 173-204.
12.
Bramley, G. and Evans, A. (1984). Grant-Related Expenditure: the wrong basis for rate-capping. Municipal Journal, 17 February.
13.
Bramley, G., Evans, A., Lambert, C. and Leather, P. (1983). Grant-Related Expenditure: a review of the system , SAUS Working Paper 29. Bristol: School for Advanced Urban Studies.
14.
Break, G. (1980). Financing Government in a Federal System. Washington DC: Brookings.
15.
Breheny, M. (ed.). (1985). Defence expenditure and regional development: special issue ofBuilt Environment, 11:3.
16.
Buchanan, I. (1950). Federalism and fiscal equity. American Economic Review, 40.4: 583-99.
17.
Burgess, T. and Travers, T. (1980). Ten Billion Pounds: Whitehall's takeover of the town halls. London: Grant McIntyre .
18.
Buxton, M. and Klein, R. (1978). Allocating health resources: a commentary on the report of the Resource Allocation Working Party, Royal Commission on the National Health Service Research Paper No. 3. London: HMSO.
19.
Collard, D. (1978). Altruism and Economy: A study in non-selfish economics . Oxford: Martin Robertson.
20.
Commonwealth Of Australia. (1985). National Inquiry into Local Government Finance: Report. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service .
21.
Culyer, A.J. (1980). The Political Economy of Social Policy. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
22.
Culyer, A.J. (1983). Economics without economic man. Social Policy and Administration, 17: 188-203.
23.
Danziger, J. (1978). Making Budgets. Beverley Hills , Sage.
24.
Dawson, D. (1983). Financial incentives for change, in K. Young (ed.). National Interests and Local Government. London: Heinemann .
25.
Department Of Education And Science. (1983 ). Statistical Bulletin 12/83: Participation in education by the 16-19 age group and its association with the socio-economic characteristics of an area. London: Department of Education and Science.
26.
Department Of Education And Science. (1984 ). Statistical Bulletin 13/84; School standards and spending; statistical analysis. London: Department of Education and Science.
27.
Department Of The Environment. (1985). Grant-Related Expenditure: How the expenditure needs of local authorities are assessed in the block grant. London: Department of the Environment.
28.
Department Of The Environment. (1986). Paying for Local Government. Cmnd. 9714. London : HMSO.
29.
Evans, A. (1985). Equalizing grants for public transport subsidy . Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 105-138.
30.
Fabrikant, R. (1977). A long overdue comment on Shoup's 'Standards for distributing a free government service: crime prevention'. Public Finance, 32: 111-118.
31.
Feldstein, M. (1975). Wealth neutrality and local choice in public education . American Economic Review, March.
32.
Foster, C. (1972). Public finance aspects of national settlement patterns. UrbanStudies, 9: 79-98.
33.
Foster, C., Jackman, R. and Perlman, M. (1980). Local Government Finance in a Unitary State. London: Allen and Unwin.
34.
Graham, J. (1982). Equalization and Canadian federalism. Public Finance.
35.
Head, J. (1974). Public Goods and Public Welfare. Durham, N Carolina : Duke University Press.
36.
Hill, M. and Bramley, G. (1986). Analysing Social Policy. Oxford : Blackwell.
37.
Hunter, J. (1977). Federalism and fiscal balance: a comparative study . Canberra: Australian National University Press.
38.
Inman, R. (1979). The fiscal performance of local governments: an interpretative review, in P. Mieszowski and W. Straszheim (eds.). Current issues in Urban Economics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.
39.
Jackman, R. and Sellars, M. (1977). The distribution of RSG: the hows and whys of the new needs formula. CES Review, 1.
40.
Jones, B. (1977). Distributional considerations in models of government service provision. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 12: 291-312.
41.
Jones, G. and Stewart, J. (1983). The Case for Local Government. London: Allen and Unwin.
42.
King, D. (1984). Fiscal Tiers; the economics of multi-level government . London: Allen and Unwin.
43.
Knapp, M. (1984). The economics of social care. London: MacMillan.
44.
Le Grand, J. (1982). The Strategy of Equality: redistribution and the social services. London: Allen and Unwin.
45.
Leather, P. (1983). Housing (dis)investment programmes. Policy and Politics, 11: 215-30.
46.
Levy, F., Meltsner, A., and Wildavsky, A. (1974). Urban Outcomes: schools, streets and libraries . Berkeley: University of California Press.
47.
Lord, R. (1984). Value for Money in Education. London: Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy .
48.
Midwinter, A. (1984). The Politics of Local Spending. Edinburgh: Mainstream.
49.
Musgrave, R. (1961). Approaches to a fiscal theory of political federalism , in National Bureau of Economic Research, Public Finances: Needs, Sources and Utilization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
50.
Musgrave, P. and Musgrave, B. (1980). Public finance in Theory and Practice, 3rd, edition . New York: McGraw-Hill.
51.
Newton, K. and Karran, T. (1985). The Politics of Local Expenditure. London: MacMillan.
52.
Oakland, W. (1979). Central cities: fiscal plight and prospects for reform, in P. Mieszkowski, and W. Straszheim, (eds.). Current Issues in Urban Economics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins .
53.
Oates, W. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. New York : Harcourt Brace.
54.
Oates, W. (1977). The political economy of fiscal federalism. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath.
55.
Oecd. (1980). Measuring local government expenditure needs; OECD Urban Management Series. Paris: OECD.
56.
Rhodes, T. and Bailey, S. (1979). Equity, statistics and the distribution of the Rate Support Grant. Policy and Politics, 7.1: 83-98.
57.
Rich, R. (ed.). (1982). Analysing urban service distributions. Lexington, Mass. : D. C. Heath.
58.
Roweth, B. (1980). Statistics for policy: needs assessment in RSG . Public Administration, 58 (summer): 173-186.
59.
Shoup, C. (1964). Standards for the distribution of a free public service: crime prevention. Public Finance, 19.4.
60.
Stiglitz, J. (1977). The theory of local public goods, in M. Feldstein and R. Inman (eds.). The Economics of Public Services. London: MacMillan.
61.
Sugden, R. (1981). The political economy of public choice. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
62.
Webster, B. (1981). The distributional effects of local government services: a framework for analysis, in B. Leach and J. Stewart (eds.). Approaches in Public Policy. London: Allen and Unwin.
63.
Williams, A. (1974). 'Need' as a demand concept (with special reference to health), in A. Culyer (ed.). Economic Policies and Social Goals. London: Martin Robertson.
64.
Zimmermann, H. (1985). The integration of policies of fiscal equalization and regional policies: theory and European examples. Environemt and Planning c: Government and Policy, 3.4: 451-61.
