Public housing is an important source of accommodation in Hong Kong. Subsidies to public housing are tied to the consumption of housing services. Consumer's consumption pattern will therefore be distorted, and a welfare loss incurred as compared to an equivalent cash transfer. This paper seeks to measure the extent to which tenants' benefit from public housing subsidies. A measure of net tenant benefit is used, which is based upon the Marshallian consumer surplus concept. The results indicate that Hong Kong's public housing programme has had a significant impact upon households' consumption patterns, and that the welfare loss is relatively low.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Deleeuw, F. (1971). The Demand for Housing: A Review of Cross-Section Evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 23: 1-10.
2.
Desalvo, J. (1971). A Methodology for Evaluating Housing Programs . Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 11: 173-185.
3.
Desalvo, J. (1975). Benefits and Costs of New York City's Middle Income Housing Program. Journal of Political Economy Vol. 83: 791-805.
4.
Hong Kong Government. (1980). Rating and Valuation Department. Property Review, Table 4.
5.
Hong Kong GovErnment.Hong Kong Housing Authority Annual Report, 1979-80, p. 70.
6.
Knox, P. (1982). Urban Social Geography. London: Longman.
7.
Kraft, J. and Kraft, A. (1979). Benefits and Costs of the Low Rent Public Housing . Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 19: 309-317.
8.
Leung, H.K. (1976). Residential Housing: An Economic Analysis of Housing Policies. Unpublished M. Phil Thesis, Department of Economics, theChinese University of Hong Kong.
9.
Muth, R. (1973). Public Housing: An Economic Evaluation. American EnterpriseInstitute for Public Policy Research, Washington.
10.
Olsen, E. (1972). An Econometric Analysis of Rent Control. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 80: 1081-1100.
11.
Olsen, E. and Prescott, J. (1969). Analysis of Alternative Measures of Tenant Benefits of Government Housing Program with Illustrative Calculations from Public Housing . Rand Corporation, Report P-4129.
12.
Polinsky, A. and Ellwook, D. (1977), An Empirical Reconciliation of Micro and Grouped Estimates of the Demand of Housing. Discussion Paper 567, Department of Economics, Harvard University.
13.
Quigleyt J. (1978). Housing Markets and Housing Demand: Analytic Approaches , in Bourne L. and Hitchcock J. eds. Urban Housing Markets, University of Toronto Press, 23-44.
14.
Willig, R. (1976). Consumer's Surplus without Apology. American Economic Review, Vol. 66: 589-597.
15.
Yu, F.L. (1982). Productive Efficiency of Hong Kong's Public Housing Program. Discussion Paper, 82-03, Department of Economics, Hong Kong Baptist College.
