Summary. A number of writers have pointed out that the word 'planning' is used so loosely that it can describe almost any approach to policy-making or decision-making. This paper asks whether it is in fact possible to identify planning as an analytically distinct method of informing and making public policies and decisions. (Clearly, it will not be empirically distinct, since in practice, policies and decisions will also reflect the influence of other 'methods', such as relying upon the market, or upon the ballot box). To permit the examination of this question, four such analytically distinct methods of decision-making, of which planning is one, are each set out in ideal-type form. Planning, since it is less readily comprehended, is set out in more detail than are the other three. This is done by breaking it down into its most characteristic 'constituent ideas'. Examination of these 'constituent ideas' of planning thought suggests that they fall into two groups. Firstly, we can distinguish a collection of ideas, each of which has intellectual credibility, but none of which seems logically or empirically to be the prerogative of planning; any policy-making, planned or unplanned, would seem able to make use of them. Secondly we can distinguish among the 'constituent ideas' of planning thought a group which are not intellectually credible, since their meaning is unclear. It is therefore concluded that planning cannot be an analytically distinct method of informing and making public policies and decisions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allison, L. (1975). Environmental Planning: A Political and Philosophical Analysis, London, Allen and Unwin .
2.
Almond, G.A. & Verba, S. (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, Princeton (N.J.)Princeton University Press.
3.
Altshuler, A.A. (1965). The City Planning Process: A Political Analysis , Ithaca (N.Y.)Cornell University Press.
4.
Arctander, P. (1972). The process is the purpose, Journal of the Royal Town Planning Institute, 58, 7 (July/August) 313-315.
5.
Arrow, K.J. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values, New York, Wiley.
6.
Barker, A. (1979). Public Participation in Britain: A Classified Bibliography, London, Bedford Square Press/Royal Town Planning Institute.
7.
Baum, H.S. (1977). Toward a post-industrial planning theory: a return to first principles, Policy Sciences, 8, 4 (Dec) 401-421.
8.
Benveniste, G. (1973). The Politics of Expertise, London, Croom Helm.
9.
Blowers, A. (1980). The Limits of Power The Politics of Local Planning Policy, Oxford, Pergamon.
10.
Burchell, R. W. & Sternlieb, G. (eds.) (1978). Planning Theory in the 1980's: A Search for Future Directions, New Brunswick (N.J.)Centre for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University.
11.
Camhis, M. (1979). Planning Theory and Philosophy, London, Tavistock.
12.
Chadwick, G. (1978). A Systems View of Planning, (revised edition) , Oxford, Pergamon.
13.
Colenutt, B. & Ambrose, P. (1975). The Property Machine, Harmondsworth , Penguin.
14.
Counter Information Services. (n.d. 1973?). The Recurrent Crisis of London, London, CIS.
15.
Cowan, P. (ed.). (1973). The Future of Planning, London, Heinemann .
16.
Cross, D.T. (1975). Forecasting in Urban and Regional Planning, London, SSRC.
17.
Cullingworth, J. B. (ed.). (1973). Problems of an Urban Society: Vol. III: Planning for Change, London, Allen & Unwin.
18.
Davies, J.G. (1972). The Evangelistic Bureaucrat: A Study of a Planning Exercise in Newcastle upon Tyne, London, Tavistock.
19.
Dennis, N. (1972). Public Participation & Planners' Blight, London, Faber.
20.
Diamond, D. R. & McLoughlin, J. B. (eds.). (1973). Education for Planning: The Development of Knowledge and Capability for Urban Governance, (Report of a working group at the Centre for Environmental Studies, London)Oxford, Pergamon.
21.
Dror, Y. (1963). The planning process: a facet design, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 29, 1, 46-58; reprinted in Dror, Y.Ventures in Policy Sciences, New York and Amsterdam , Elsevier, 1971, and in Faludi, A. (ed.). A Reader in Planning Theory , Oxford, Pergamon, 1973.
22.
Eddison, P.A. (1973). Comprehensive planning for local government in Stewart, M. (ed.). The City: Problems of Planning, Harmondsworth, Penguin.
23.
Elkin, S.C. (1974). Politics and Land Use Planning: The London Experience , Cambridge University Press.
24.
Etzioni, A. (1968). The Active Society: A Theory of Societal and Political Processes, New York, Free Press .
25.
Eversley, D.E.C. (1973). The Planner in Society: The Changing Role of a Profession, London, Faber.
26.
Eversley, D.E.C. & Moody, M. (1976). The Growth of Planning Research Since the Early 1960's, London, SSRC.
27.
Faludi, A. (1970). The planning environment and the meaning of 'planning ', Regional Studies, 4, 1, 1-9.
28.
Faludi, A. (1973a). A Reader in Planning Theory, Oxford, Pergamon.
29.
Faludi, A. (1973b). Planning Theory, Oxford, Pergamon.
30.
Floyd, J. (1977). Creation of planning ideology: fads and fashions from high rise to local plans, Built Environment, 3, pp. 155-160.
31.
Friedmann, J. (1973). Retracking America: A Theory of Transactive Planning , Garden City (N.Y.)Anchor/Doubleday .
32.
Friedmann, J. & Hudson, B. (1974). Knowledge and action: A guide to planning theory , Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 40, 1 (Jan) 2-16.
33.
Galloway, T.D. & Mahayi, R.G. (1977). Planning theory in retrospect: The process of paradigm change, Journal of the American Institute of Planners , 43, 162-71.
34.
Gillingwater, D. (1975). Regional Planning and Social Change: A Responsive Approach, Farnborough, Saxon House .
35.
Glass, R. (1959). The evaluation of planning: some sociological considerations, International Social Science Journal, 11, 3; reprinted in Faludi, A. (ed.). A Reader in Planning Theory, Oxford, Pergamon.
36.
Goldthorpe, J.H. (1971). The future of futurology, European Journal of Sociology, 12, 2263-288.
37.
Hall, P. (1974). Urban and Regional Planning, Harmondsworth, Penguin.
38.
Hall, P., Thomas, R., Gracey, H. and Drewett, R. (1973). The Containment of Urban England, (2 vols.). London, Political and Economic Planning/Allen & Unwin/Sage .
39.
Halsey, S. (1970). Introduction to Dennis, N. People and Planning , London, Faber.
40.
Hightower, H.C. (1969). Planning theory in contemporary professional education , Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 5, 326-329.
41.
Hindess, B. (1971). The Decline of Working Class Politics, London, McGibbon & Kee.
42.
Kogan, M. (1975). Educational Policy-making: A Study of Interest Groups and Parliament, London, Allen & Unwin.
43.
Lepawsky, A. (1971). The progressives and the planners, Public Administration Review, 31, 3, 297-303.
44.
Levin, P.H. (1976). Government and the Planning Process, London, Allen & Unwin.
45.
Lindblom, C.E. (1965). The Intelligence of Democracy: Decision Making through Mutual Adjustment, New York, Macmillan.
46.
Lipset, S.M. (1959). Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics, New York, Doubleday and London , Mercury Books.
47.
Madge, C. (1968). Introduction to set of articles on Social Planning, International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, New York & London, Free Press /Macmillan.
48.
Mandelbaum, S.J. (1979). A complete general theory of planning is impossible , Policy Sciences, 11, 59-71.
49.
Mannheim, K. (1940). Man and Society in an Age of Reconstruction: Studies in Modern Social Structure, London, Routledge.
50.
Manor, Y. and Shaffer, G. (1977). Can planning be salvaged?Public Administration, Vol. 55 (Summer) 211-225.
51.
Mccallum, J.D. (1976). Comparative Study in Planning: Exploration of the 'Political Culture' of Planning in Britain and the United States, University of Glasgow, Department of Town and Regional Planning , Discussion paper No. 7.
52.
Mcloughlin, J.B. (1973). Control and Urban Planning, London, Faber.
53.
Meyerson, M. & Banfield, E.C. (1955). Politics, Planning and the Public Interest: the Case of Public Housing in Chicago, New York, Free Press.
54.
Miller, G.A., Galanier, E.H. & Pribram, K. (1960). Plans and the Structure of Behaviour, New York, Holt.
55.
Ozbekhan, H. (1969). Towards a general theory of planning, in Jantsch, E. (ed.), Perspectives of Planning, Paris, Organization for Economic Co-operation & Development.
56.
Pahl, R.E. (1977). Playing the rationality game: the sociologist as a hired expert, ch. 6 of Bell, C. and Newby, H. (eds.), Doing Sociological Research, London, Allen and Unwin.
57.
Peterson, W. (1966). On some meanings of 'planning', Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 32, 3 (May) 130-142; reprinted in Meadows, P. & Mizruchi, E.H.Urbanism, Urbanisation and Change: Comparative Perspectives, Reading (Mass.), Addison-Wesley, 1969.
58.
Platt, J. (1972). Survey data and social policy, British Journal of Sociology,23, 1, 72-92.
59.
Popper, K. (1945). The Open Society and its Enemies, London, Routledge.
60.
Popper, K. (1957). The Poverty of Historicism, London, Routledge.
61.
Power, J. (1971). Planning: magic and techniques: in Institute for Operational Research: Beyond Local Government Reform, London, Tavistock.
62.
Schubert, G. (1960). The Public Interest: A Critique of the Theory of a Political Concept, Glencoe (Ill.), Free Press.
63.
Self, P. (1970). Nonsense on stilts: cost benefit analysis and the Roskill Commission, Political Quarterly, 41, 249-260.
64.
Self, P. (1976). The Econocrats and the Policy Process: The Politics and Philosophy of Cost Benefit Analysis, London, Macmillan.
65.
Sharpe, L.J. (1975). The social scientist and policy making: some cautionary thoughts and trans-Atlantic reflections, Policy and Politics , 4, 2 (Dec.) 7-34.
66.
Simmie, J. (1974). Citizens in Conflict: The Sociology of Town Planning , London, Hutchinson.
67.
Solesbury, W. (1974). Policy in Urban Planning: Structure Plans, Programmes and Local Plans, Oxford, Pergamon .
68.
Van Gunsteren, H.R. (1976a). Constructing a city in speech: planning as political theory, in: Barry, B. (ed.), Power and Political Theory: Some European Perspectives, London, Wiley.
69.
Van Gunsteren, H.R. (1976b). The Quest for Control: A Critique of the Rational-Central-Rule Approach in Public Affairs, London, Wiley.
70.
Webber, M. (1963). The prospects for policies planning, in Duhl, L. J. (ed.). The Urban Condition: People and Policy in theMetropolis, New York, Basic Books.
71.
Webber, M. (1968). Planning in an environment of change, Town Planning Review39, 3, 179-195 and 39, 4, 277-295; reprinted in Cullingworth, J. B. (ed.), Problems of an Urban Society, Vol. III: Planning for Change, London, Allen & Unwin, 1972 .
72.
Wildavsky, A. (1973). If planning is everything, maybe it's nothing , Policy Sciences, 4, 2, 127-153.
73.
Wiles, P.J.D. (1962). The Political Economy of Communism, Oxford, Blackwell.
74.
Wiles, P.J.D. (1966). Economic activation, planning and the social order , in: Gross, B. M. (ed.), Action under Planning: The Guidance of Economic Development, New York, McGraw Hill.
75.
Young, M. (ed.). (1968). Forecasting and the Social Sciences, London, Heinemann/Social Science Research Council .
