Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study develops and estimates an econometric model of choice among residential communities. The econometric method employed is maximum-likelihood estimation of a multinomial logit. This makes it possible to examine the effects of local public services and other community attributes on the residential location decisions by families. The model was estimated for six subsamples differing by household size, income, and age of head of household.

For most of the subsamples that were examined, the conclusion is that local public services and other community characteristics play only minor roles in determining the residential location choice. The major determinant of residential location is the quantity of housing services that the household can obtain in a community.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alonso, W. (1964). Location and Use. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.

Barr, J.L. (1973). Tiebout models of community structure. Papers of the Regional Science Association, Vol. 30:113-139.

Bass (1963). Jobs, People and Land: Bay Area Simulation Study, Special Report No. 6, Centre for Real Estate and Urban Economics, Berkeley .

Butler, E.W. (1969). Moving Behavior and Residential Choice: A National Survey, Report No. 81, Highway. Research Board.

Domencich, T. (1975). Urban Travel Demand, North Holland, New York.

Ellickson, B. (1971). Jurisdictional fragmentation and residential choice . American Economic Review, Vol. 61: 334-339.

Friedman, J. (1975). Housing Location and the Supply of Local Public Services, P-5421, The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California.

Kain, J.F. , and Quigley, J.M. (1970). Measuring the value of housing quality. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 65: 552-547.

Kiesling, H. (1967). Measuring a local government service: a study of school districts in New York State. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 49: 356-367.

10.

Lerman, S.R. (1977). Location, housing, automobile ownership and the mode to work: a joint choice model. Transportation Research Board Record, No. 610; 6-11.

11.

Luce, R. (1959). Individual Choice Behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

12.

McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka , (ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press, New York.

13.

McGuire, M. (1974). Group segregation and optimal jurisdiction. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 82:112-131.

14.

Muth, R. (1969). Cities and Housing, Chicago : University of Chicago Press.

15.

Oates, W.E. (1969). The effects of property taxes and local public spending on property values: an empirical study of tax capitalization and the Tiebout Hypothesis. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 77: 951-971.

16.

Quigley, J.M. (1974). Housing demand in the short run: an analysis of polytomous choice. Explanations in Economic Research, 3, 76-102.

17.

Polinsky, Mitchell (1970). Public goods in a settling of local governments , (unpublished Working Paper, the Urban Institute, Washington, DC.

18.

Pollakowski, H. (1974). The effects of local public services on residential location decision: an empirical study of the San Francisco Bay Area. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Economics, University of California , Berkeley (unpublished).

19.

Strazheim, M. (1971). The demand for residential housing services. Discussion Paper No. 192, Harvard Institute of Economics Research (unpublished).

20.

Stucker, J.P. (1972). Long-Run Effects on an Intraurban Air Transportation System on Residential Location and Community in the San Francisco Bay Area, R-1077-NASA, The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California.

21.

Tiebout, C.M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 64: 416-424.

A Conditional Logit Model of the Role of Local Public Services in Residential Choice

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References