The assertion that where crimes take place is to a large extent determined by physical lay-out has been made forcibly by Oscar Newman in 'Defensible Space', where particular attention is given to the problem of high rise developments. Here, data from a Sheffield survey has been used to test whether area crime patterns do vary with design features. Some differences were found, but these by no means showed high rise flats to be at a disadvantage. To reconcile these results with Newman's, the concept of 'defensible space' was analysed in some detail. It seemed that the concept was so wide that many designs could incorporate both good and poor defensible space qualities, and a more rigorous definition was recommended.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baldwin, J. (1974). The role of the victim in certain property offences. CLR, 353-58.
2.
Baldwin, J. (1975a). Urban criminality and the 'problem' estate. Local Government Studies, October, 12-20.
3.
Baldwin, J. (1975b). British areal studies of crime: an assessment . BJC, Vol. 15: 211-27.
4.
Baldwin, J. and Bottoms, A.E. (1976). The urban criminal. London : Tavistock.
5.
Banham, R. (1973). The Parkhill victory. New Society , 18/10/73, 154-156.
6.
Bottoms, A.E. (1974). Book Review of Defensible space. BJC, Vol. 14: 203-206.
7.
Brantingham, P.J. and Brantingham, P.L. (1975). The spatial patterning of burglary. Howard Journal, Vol. 14, no. 2: 11-23.
8.
Brown, J. (1974). High rise flats are nurseries of crime. Sheffield Morning Telgraph, 4 May.
9.
Burbridge, M. (1975). Some current British research. NACRO, 36-44.
10.
Dept. Of Environment (1971). Wilful damage on housing estates. Building Research Station Digest, 1-4.
11.
Glass, R. (1955). Urban sociology in Great Britain. Current Sociology, Vol. 4.
12.
Jacobs, J. (1969). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.
