The paper examines the implicit assumptions made in hedonic studies of urban house prices. It is apparent that the technique can only be applied to city wide cross section analysis when sample data is capable of meaningful disaggregation. Previous uses of the technique are examined and it is suggested that the methodology is inappropriate for testing hypotheses derived from spatial residential models. Possible avenues of development for house price research are outlined.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Apps, P.F. (1974a). An approach to urban modelling and evaluation. A residential model: 1, Theory. Environment and Planning, Vol. 5: 619-32.
2.
Apps, P.F. (1974b). An approach to urban modelling and evaluation. A residential model: 3. Environment and Planning, Vol 6: 11-31.
3.
Archer, C.A. and Wilkinson, R.K. (1973). Measuring the determinants of relative house prices . Environment and Planning, Vol. 5: 357-67.
4.
Ball, M.J. (1973). Recent work on the determinants of relative house prices. UrbanStudies, Vol. 10: 213-33.
5.
Ball, M.J. and Kirwan, R. (1975). The economics of an urban housing market, Bristol area study. Centre for Environmental Studies, CES RP15.