Advisory Commission On Intergovernmental Relations (1962). Alternative Approaches to Governmental Reorganization in Metropolitan Areas. Washington DC.
2.
Advisory Commission On Intergovernmental Relations (1966). Metropolitan America: Challenge to Federalism, Commission Findings and Proposals, M-31, Washington DC , p. 119.
3.
Advisory Commission On Intergovernmental Relations (May 1973). Bay area regionalism: institutions, processes and programs. In Regional Governance Promise and Performance, Substate Regionalism and the Federal System, Vol. II-Case Studies, A-41, Washington DC: 76.
4.
Banfield, E.C. and Grodzins, M. (1973). The logic of metropolitan reorganization. In David, S. M. and Peterson, P. E. (eds), Urban Politics and Public Policy: The City in Crisis. New York: Praeger , p. 52.
5.
Bollens, J.C. (1957). Special District Governments in the United States . Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
Elazar, D.J. (1970). The resurgence of federalism. State Government, Vol. XLIII, 3: 166.
7.
Elazar, D.J. (1967). Federalism. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan .
8.
Elazar, D.J. (1973). Authentic federalism for America. National Civic Review, Vol. 62, 10: 475-476.
9.
Elazar, D. J. (1965). Statement, Five-Year Record of the ACIR and Its Future Role, Joint Hearings before the subcommittees on Intergovernmental Relations of the Senate and House Committees on Governmental Operations. 88th Congress, 1st Session, May 25-27, 1965. Washington DC: Government Printing Office , p. 150.
10.
Forrester, J.W. (1969). Urban Dynamics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, p. 9.
11.
Grodzins, M. (1960). The federal system. Goals for Americans.
12.
Cf. Hallman, H.W. (1970, 1973). Neighbourhood Control of Public Programs and Government by Neighbourhoods. New York: Praeger.
13.
Holden, M. Jr. (1964). The governance of the metropolis as a problem in diplomacy. Journal of Politics, Vol. 26.
14.
Holden, M., JR. (1966). Imperialism in bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, LX, 4.
15.
Jones, V. (1973). Statement, Public Hearings on Substate Regionalism , Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, San Francisco, June 21st, p. 1.
16.
Jones, V. (1971). Representative Local Government: From Neighborhood to Region, Appendix VIII, in Scott, S. and Nathan, H. (eds), op. cit, p. 285.
17.
Jones, V. (1971). Op. cit, p. 296.
18.
Jones, V. (1968). Metropolitan detente: is it politically and constitutionally possible?George Washington Law Review, Vol. 36, 4, May: 743 ff.
19.
Jones, V. (1973). Statement, Public Hearing on Substate Regionalism , Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, San Francisco, June 21st, p. 1.
20.
Jones, V. (1968). Op. cit, pp. 758-759.
21.
Kotler, M. (1969). Neighborhood Government. Indianapolis : Bobbs-Merrill.
22.
cf. Lindblom, C.E. (1965). The Intelligence of Democracy: Decision Making Through Mutual Adjustment. New York: The Free Press.
23.
Lineberg, R.L. (1970). Reforming metropolitan governance: requiem or reality? TheGeorgetown Law Journal, 58, March-May: 675-718.
24.
Long, N.E. and Heilig, P.A. (1972). Regions within states: a look at alternatives . National Civic Review, Vol. 61, 4: 289.
25.
Lowi, T.J. (1969). The End of Liberalism. New York: W. W. Norton.
26.
Martin, R. (1963). Metropolis in Transition. Washington D.C.: Housing and House Finance Agency.
27.
Mogulof, M.B. (1971). Governing Metropolitan Areas: A Critical Review of Councils of Governments and the Federal Role. Washington D.C.: The Urban Institute, p. 19.
28.
Mogulof, M.B. (1971). Op. cit, pp. 18-19.
29.
Mogulof, M.B. (1973). Federally Encouraged Multi-Jurisdictional Agencies in Three Metropolitan Areas, in Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations A-41, op. cit, pp. 172 and 142.
30.
Mogulof, M.B. (1971). Op. cit, p. 15.
31.
Morrow, W.L. (1973). Princes, Pundits and Policy Planning. Public Administration Review, Vol. 33, 3: 285.
32.
Morrow, W.L.Op. cit.
33.
Reagan, M.D. (1972). The New Federalism. New York : Oxford University Press, pp. 158-159.
34.
Segal, M. and Fruschler, A.L. (1970). Policymaking in the intergovernmental system: emerging patterns and a typology of relationships. American Political Science Association, Los Angeles, September, p. 11.
35.
Scott, S. and Nathan, H. (eds) (1971). Adapting Government to Regional Needs, Report of the Conference on Bay Area Regional Organization, April 18th, 1970, Berkeley, Calif., Institute of Governmental Studies, pp. 186-190.
36.
Studenski, P. (1930). The Government of Metropolitan Areas in the United States. New York: National Municipal League.
37.
Wingo, L. (1972). Introduction: logic and idealogy in metropolitan reform. In Eric, S. P. et al., Reform of Metropolitan Governments. Washington D.C.: Resources for the Future, Inc., p. 1.
38.
Wood, R.C. (1959). A division of powers in metropolitan areas. In Maass, A. (ed), Area and Power: A Theory of Local Government. New York: The Free Press.
39.
Wood, R.C. (1958). Metropolitan Government 1975: an extrapolation of trends. the new metropolis: green belts, grass roots or gargantua?American Political Science Review, Vol. LII: 117.
40.
Yates, D. (1973). Neighborhood Democracy. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath.
41.
Zimmerman, J.F. (1974). The metropolitan area problem. The Annals of the American Academy: 134-135.
Zimmerman, J.F. (1972). Substate regional government: designing a new procedure. National Civic Review, Vol. 61, 6: 289.
44.
Zimmerman, J.F. (1974). The patchwork approach: adaptive responses to increasing urbanization. Metropolitan America: Papers on the State of Knowledge . Washington D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, pp. 465-509.