Sense of Place,Quality of Life and Local Socioeconomic Context: Evidence from the Survey of English Housing,2002/03

Abstract

This paper explores associations between local socioeconomic context and perceptions of neighbourhood quality of life, using a multilevel modelling approach to analyse data from the 2002/03 Survey of English Housing. A range of individual, property and area variables is successively introduced, the aim being to determine which of these has the greatest influence on the probability of being dissatisfied with one's neighbourhood. Several variables relating to property type and characteristics were derived and a set of ecological independent variables was used that is different from those deployed in previous analyses. Using a multilevel approach, the analysis determines the spatial scale at which variance is most concentrated—namely, the primary sampling unit (PSU). The relationship between tenure and property type is broken down and it is shown that social renting per se is not necessarily associated with greater dissatisfaction, although there is an association between private renting and greater satisfaction, probably reflecting the age and social profile of private renters. In respect of ecological indicators, increased levels of deprivation were associated with a raised probability of expressing neighbourhood satisfaction, as was settlement size, which is consistent with earlier work on quality of life. Conclusions are drawn concerning the use of studies of this kind to monitor trends in neighbourhood satisfaction.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Breheny, M. , Hall, P. and Hart, D. (1987) Northern lights: a development agenda for the north in the 1990s. Derrick Wade and Partners, London.

Buck, N. (2001) Identifying neighbourhood effects on social exclusion, Urban Studies, 38, pp. 2251—2275.

Burrows, R. and Rhodes, D. (1998) Unpopular Places: Area Disadvantage and the Geography of Misery in England. Bristol: Policy Press.

Coleman, A. (1985) Utopia on Trial: Vision and Reality in Planned Housing. London: Hilary Shipman .

Detr (Department For Transport Local Government And The Regions) (2000) Measuring multiple deprivation at the small area level, the indices of deprivation 2000. DETR , London.

Donovan, N. and Halpern, D. (2002) Life satisfaction: a review of literature and implications for government. Prime Minister's Strategy Unit, London.

Dorling, D. and Rees, P. (2003) A nation still dividing? The British census and social polarisation 1971—2001, Environment and Planning A, 35, pp. 1287—1313.

Dorling, D. and Rees, P. (2004) A nation dividing? Some interpretations of the question, Environment and Planning A, 36, pp. 369— 373.

Dorling, D. and Thomas, B. (2004) People and Places: A 2001 Census Atlas. Bristol: Policy Press.

10.

Foley, D. (1960) British town planning: one ideology or three?, British Journal of Sociology, 11(3), pp. 211—231.

11.

Gibbons, S. , Green, A. , Gregg, P. and Machin, S. (2005) Is Britain pulling apart? Area disparities in employment, education and crime. Working Paper No. WP-05/120, Centre for Markets and Public Organisation, University of Bristol.

12.

Goodhart, D. (2004) Too diverse?, Prospect, 95, pp. 24—31.

13.

Johnston, R. , Poulsen, M. and Forrest, J. (2005) On the measurement and meaning of residential segregation: a response to Simpson, Urban Studies, 42, pp. 1221—1227.

14.

Johnston, R.J. , Propper, C. , Sarker, R. ET AL. (2005) Neighbourhood social capital and neighbourhood effects, Environment and Planning A, 37(8), pp. 1143—1459.

15.

Kawachi, I. , Kennedy, B. and Lochner, B. (1997) Long live community: social capital and public health, The American Prospect, 35, pp. 56—59.

16.

Layard, R. (2005) Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. London: Penguin.

17.

Mohan, J. (2004) A nation dividing? Some questions of interpretation , Environment and Planning A, 36, pp. 365—368.

18.

Mohan, J. , Barnard, S. , Jones, K. and Twigg, L. (2006) Developing and evaluating small-area indicators of the neighbourhood social environment, Environment and Planning A, 38, pp. 2173—2192.

19.

Mori (2004) Public attitudes to public services. MORI, London (http://www.mori.com/polls/2004/cabinet-office.shtml ).

20.

Parkes, A. , Kearns, A. and Atkinson, R. (2001) What makes people dissatisfied with their neighbourhoods?, Urban Studies, 39, pp. 2413—2438.

21.

Putnam, R. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster .

22.

Rogerson, R.J. , Findlay, A.M. , Paddison, R. and Morris, A.S. (1996) Class, consumption, and quality of life, Progress in Planning, 45, pp. 1—66.

23.

Sennett, R. (2003) Respect. London: Penguin.

24.

Simpson, L. (2004) Statistics of racial segregation: measures, evidence and policy, Urban Studies, 41, pp. 661—681.

25.

Simpson, L. (2005) On the measurement and meaning of residential segregation: a reply to Johnston, Poulsen and Forrest, Urban Studies, 42, pp. 1229—1230.

26.

Snijders, T. and Bosker, R. (1999) Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modelling. London: Sage.

27.

Stafford, M. , Bartley, M. , Sacker, A. ET AL. (2003) Measuring the social environment: social cohesion and material deprivation in English and Scottish neighbourhoods, Environment and Planning A, 35, pp. 1459—1475.

28.

Urban Task Force (2000) Towards an urban renaissance. DETR, London .