This study assesses the impact of proximity to light rail transit stations on residential property values in Buffalo, New York, where light rail has been in service for 20 years, but population is declining and ridership is decreasing. Hedonic models are constructed of assessed value for residential properties within half a mile of 14 light rail stations and independent variables are included that describe property characteristics, neighbourhood characteristics and locational amenities. The model suggests that, for homes located in the study area, every foot closer to a light rail station increases average property values by $2.31 (using geographical straight-line distance) and $0.99 (using network distance). Consequently, a home located within one-quarter of a mile radius of a light rail station can earn a premium of $1300-3000, or 2-5 per cent of the city's median home value. Model results further suggest that three independent variables-the number of bathrooms, size of the parcel and location on the East side or West side of Buffalo-are more influential than rail proximity in predicting property values. Individual regression models for each of the light rail system's 14 stations suggest that effects are not felt evenly throughout the system. Proximity effects are positive in high-income station areas and negative in low-income station areas. An analysis of the actual walking distance to stations (along the street network) versus the perceived proximity to stations (measured by straight-line distance) reveals that the results are statistically more significant in the network distance than the straight-line distance model, but the effects are greater in the straight-line distance model, which suggests that apparent proximity to rail stations is an added locational advantage compared with physical walking distance to the station.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Almeida, T.M. (2004) Impact of proximity to light rail rapid transit on station-area property values in Buffalo, New York. MA Thesis, State University of New York.
2.
Al-Mosaind, M.A., Dueker, K.J. and Strath-Man, J.G. (1993) Light rail transit stations and property values: a hedonic price approach. Paper presented at the 72th Annual Meeting of theTransportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January.
3.
Alonso, W. (1964) Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rents. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
Anas, A. (1982) Residential Location Markets and Urban Transportation . New York: Academic Press.
5.
Anas, A. (1983) The effects of transportation on the tax base and development of cities. Report No. DOT/OST/P-30/85/005, US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.
6.
Anderson, A.C. (1970) The effect of rapid transit on property values , Appraisal Journal, 38, pp. 59-68.
7.
Armstrong, R.J. (1994) Impacts of commuter rail service as reflected in single-family residential property values, Transportation Research Record, 1466, pp. 88-97.
8.
Bae, C.-H.C. (2002) Orenco Station, Portland, Oregon: a successful transit oriented development experiment?, Transportation Quarterly , 56(3), pp. 9-18.
9.
Bajic, V. (1985) Housing market segmentation and demand for housing attributes, Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 13, pp. 58-75.
10.
Banister, D. and Berechman, J. (2000) Transport Investment and Economic Development. London: University College London Press .
11.
Barker, W.G. (1998) Bus service and real estate values. Paper presented at the 68th Annual Meeting ofthe Institute of Transportation Engineers. Toronto , August.
12.
Benjamin, J.D. and Sirmins, G.S. (1996) Mass transportation, apartment rent and property values, Journal of Real Estate Research, 12(1), pp. 1-8.
13.
Berechman, J. and Paaswell, R. (1983) Rail rapid transit investment and CBD revitalisation: methodology and results, UrbanStudies, 20(4), pp. 471-486.
14.
Bollinger, C. and Ihlanfeldt, K. (1997) The impact of rapid rail transit on economic development: the case of Atlanta's MARTA, Journal of Urban Economics, 42, pp. 179-204.
15.
Bowes, D.R. and Ihlanfeldt, K.R. (2001) Identifying the impacts of rail transit station on property values, Journal of Urban Economics, 50, pp. 1-25.
16.
Boyce, D., Allen, W.B., Mudge, R. ET AL. (1972) Impact of rapid transit on suburban residential property values and land development: analysis of the Philadelphia-Lindenwold highspeed line. Final Report to the US Department of Transportation, Department of Regional Science, University of Pennsylvania.
17.
Brigham, E.F. (1965) The determinants of residential land values, Land Economics, 41(4), pp. 325-334.
18.
Buckham, T. (2004) City gets unwanted rank on US list: hardship score called very high by institute, Buffalo News, 5 September, p. B1.
19.
Buffalo And Erie County Public Library (2005 ) Historical population estimates for the City of Buffalo and Erie County (http://ah.bfn.org/h/bflopop.html; accessed 1 June 2005).
20.
Burchell, R.W., Lowenstein, G., Dolphin, W.R. ET AL. (2002) The costs of sprawl 2000. Report No. 74, Transit Cooperative Research Program, Washington, DC.
21.
Can, A. ( 1990) Measurement of neighborhood dynamics in urban house prices , Economic Geography, 66, pp. 254-272.
22.
Capozza, D. and Helsley, R. (1989) The fundamentals of land prices and urban growth , Journal of Urban Economics, 26(3), pp. 295-306.
23.
Cervantes, N. and Dolan, T.J. (2005) Squeezing homeowners tighter; as municipalities crave revenue, revaluations are hitting residents harder than businesses, Buffalo News, 27 July, p. Al.
24.
Cervero, R. (1984) Light rail transit and urban development, Journal of the American Planning Association, 50, pp. 133-147.
25.
Cervero, R. (1994) Rail transit and joint development: land markets impacts in Washington, DC and Atlanta, Journal of the American Planning Association, 60(1), pp. 83-94.
26.
Cervero, R. and Duncan, M. (2002a) Benefits of proximity to rail on housing markets: experiences in Santa Clara County, Journal of Public Transportation , 5(1), pp. 1-18.
27.
Cervero, R. and Duncan, M. (2002b) Transit's value-added effects: light and commuter rail services and commercial land value, Transportation Research Record, 1805, pp. 8-15.
28.
Cervero, R. and Landis, J. (1995) BART at 20: land use impacts. Paper presented at the 74th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January.
29.
Cervero, R., Ferrell, C. and Murphy, S. (2002) Transit-oriented development and joint development in the United States: a literature review. Research Results Digest No. 52, Transit Cooperative Research Program, Washington, DC.
30.
Chen, H., Rufolo, A. and Dueker, K. (1998) Measuring the impact of light rail systems on single-family home prices: a hedonic approach with GIS applications. Paper presented at the 77th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January.
31.
City Of Buffalo (1993) Zoning: charter and ordinances of the City of Buffalo. Charter and Code of the City of Buffalo, Ch. 511. City of Buffalo.
32.
Clifton, K. and Handy, S. (2001) Limits on access in low-income neighborhoods and the travel patterns of low-income households. Report No. 167502-1, Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas at Austin .
33.
Damm, D., Lerman, S., Lerner-Lam, E. and Young, J. (1980) Responses of urban real estate values in anticipation of the Washington metro, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 14, pp. 315-355.
34.
Debrezion, G., Pels, E. and Rietvald, P. (2006) The impact of rail transport on real estate prices: empirical study of the Dutch housing market. Paper presented at the 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board , Washington, DC, January.
35.
Diaz, R.B. (1999) Impacts of rail transit on property values. Paper presented at the Commuter Rail/Rapid Transit Conference Sponsored by the American Public Transportation Association. Toronto, Ontario May.
36.
Ding, C., Simons, R. and Baku, E. (2000) The effect of residential investment on nearby property values: evidence from Cleveland, Ohio, Journal of Real Estate Research, 19(1), pp. 23-48.
37.
Downs, A. (2004) Still Stuck in Traffic: Coping with Peak-hour Traffic Congestion. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
38.
Dueker, K.J. and Bianco, M.J. (1999) Light rail transit impacts in Portland: the first ten years. Paper presented at the 78th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January.
39.
Duncombe, W. (2002) Estimating the cost of an adequate education in New York. Working Paper No. 44, Center for Policy Research, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse, NY.
40.
Dunphy, R.T. and The Department Of Community And Economic Resources (1982) Trends before Metrorail: a Metrorail before-and-after study report. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments , Washington, DC.
41.
Fairbanks, P. (2004) Key study says sprawl has hurt city, Buffalo News, 30 May, p. A1.
42.
Fausold, C.J. and Lilieholm, R.J. (1999) The economic value of open space: a review and synthesis, Environmental Management, 23(3), pp. 307-320.
43.
Ferguson, B.G., Goldberg, M.A. and Mark, J. (1988) The pre-service impacts of the Vancouver advanced light rail transit system on single family property values, in: J. M. Clapp and S. D. Messner (Eds) Real Estate Market Analysis: Methods and Applications , pp. 78-110. New York: Praeger .
44.
Fiscal Policy Institute (2003) The state of working New York 2003: unbalanced regional economies through expansion and recession. Fiscal Policy Institute, New York.
45.
Follain, J.R. and Jimenez, E. (1985) Estimating the demand for housing characteristics: a survey and critique, Regional Science and Urban Economics , 15. pp. 77-107.
46.
Freeman, A.M. III (1979) The hedonic price approach to measuring demand for neighborhood characteristics, in: D. Segal (Ed.) The Economics of Neighborhood, pp. 193-197. New York: Academic Press.
Galea, S., Ahren, J., Rudenstine, S. ET AL. (2005) Urban built environment and depression: a multi-level analysis, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, pp. 822-827.
49.
Gargan, E.A. (1984) Will a subway dig Buffalo out?, The New York Times, 10 June, section 4, p. 7.
50.
Garrett, T. (2004) Light rail transit in America: policy issues and prospects for economic development. Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis.
51.
Gatzlaff, D.H. and Smith, M. (1993) The impact of the Miami Metrorail on the value of residences near station locations, Land Economics, 69(1), pp. 54-66.
52.
Giuliano, G. (2004) Land use impacts of transportation investments: highways and transit, in: S. Hanson and G. Giuliano (Eds) The Geography of Urban Transportation, pp. 237-273. New York: Guilford Press.
53.
Glynn, M. (2005) Area's affordable homes at low risk of depreciation , Buffalo News, 13 March, p. B7.
54.
Goodwin, R.E. and Lewis, C.A. (1997) Land value assessment near bus transit facilities: a case study of selected transit centers in Houston, Texas. Southwest Region University Transportation Center, Texas Southern University .
55.
Grass, R.G. (1992) The estimation of residential property values around transit station sites in Washington, DC, Journal of Economics and Finance, 16, pp. 139-146.
56.
Grether, D.M. and Miezkowski, P. (1974) Determinants of real estate values, Journal of Urban Economics, 1, pp. 127-146.
57.
Hess, D.B. (2005) Access to employment for adults in poverty in the Buffalo-Niagara region, UrbanStudies, 42(7), pp. 1177-1200.
58.
Hess, D.B. and Lombardi, P.A. (2004) Policy support for and barriers to inner-city transit-oriented development: a literature review, Transportation Research Record: Journal of theTransportation Research Board, 1887, pp. 26-33.
59.
Hess, D.B. and Lombardi, P.A. (2005) Governmental subsidies for public transit: history, current issues, and recent evidence, Public Works Management andPolicy, 10(2), pp. 138-156.
60.
Hickling Lewis Brod, Inc. (2002) Commercial property benefits of transit: final report. Federal Transit Administration, Washington, DC.
61.
Huang, W. (1994) The effects of transportation infrastructure on nearby property values: a review of the literature. Research Report No. 620, Institute of Urban and Regional Studies, University of California, Berkeley.
62.
Ihlanfeldt, K. and Boehm, T.P. (1987) Government intervention in the housing market: an empirical test of the externalities rationale, Journal of Urban Economics, 22(3), pp. 276-290.
63.
Kain, J. (1988) Choosing the wrong technology: or how to spend billions and reduce transit use, Journal of AdvancedTransportation , 21, pp. 197-213.
64.
Kain, J.F. and Quigley, J.M. (1970a). Evaluating the quality of the residential environment , Environment and Planning A, 2(1), pp. 23-32.
65.
Kain, J.F. and Quigley, J.M. (1970b). Measuring the value of housing quality, Journal of the American Statistical Association,65(330), pp. 532-538.
66.
Knaap, G. (1998) The determinants of residential property values: implications for metropolitan planning, Journal of Planning Literature, 12(3), pp. 267-282.
67.
Knaap, G., Hopkins, L. and Pant, A. (1996) Does transportation planning matter? Explorations into the effects of planned transportation infrastructure on real estate sales, land values, building permits, and development sequence. Working Paper, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA.
68.
Knight, R.L. (1980) The impact of rail transit on land use: evidence and a change of perspective, Transportation, 9, pp. 3-16.
69.
Koutsopoulos, K.C. (1977) The impact of mass transit on residential property values, Annals of the Association of American Geographers , 67(4), pp. 564-576.
70.
Lakamp, P. (1999) Transit in a slump: loss of riders hurts metro bus, rail, Buffalo News, 21 September, p. 1A.
71.
Landis, J., Cervero, R., Guhathukurta, S. ET AL. (1995) Rail transit investments, real estate values, and land use change: a comparative analysis of five California rail transit systems. Research Report No. 48, Institute of Urban and Regional Studies, University of California, Berkeley .
72.
Lewis-Workman, S. and Brod, D. (1997) Measuring the neighborhood benefits of tail transit accessibility, Transportation Research Record, 1576, pp. 147-153.
73.
Liggett, R., Loukaitou-Sideris, A. and Iseki, H. (2001) Bus stop-environment connection: do characteristics of the built environment correlate with bus stop crime?, Journal of theTransportation Research Board, 1760, pp. 20-27.
74.
Liggett, R., Loukaitou-Sideris, A. and Iseki, H. (2003) Journeys to crime: assessing the effects of a light rail line on crime in the neighborhoods, Journal of PublicTransportation, 6(3), pp. 85-115.
75.
Lombardi, P.A. (2006) A destination for Buffalo's train to nowhere, Buffalo News, 8 January, pp. H1-H2.
76.
Malpezzi, S. (1996) Housing prices, externalities, and regulation in US metropolitan areas, Journal of Housing Research, 7(2), pp. 209-242.
77.
Manning, C. (1988) Explaining intercity home price differences, Journal of Real Estate and Finance andEconomics, 2(2), pp. 131-149.
78.
McDonald, J.F. and Osuji, C.I. (1995) The effect of anticipated transportation improvement on residential land values, Regional Science and Urban Economics , 25(3), pp. 261-278.
79.
Mills, E.S. (1972) Studies in the Structure of the Urban Economy. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
80.
Mohring, H. (1961) Land values and the measurement of highway benefits , Journal of Political Economy, 69, pp. 236-249.
81.
Muth, R.F. (1969) Cities and Housing: The Spatial Patterns of Urban Residential Land Use. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
82.
Muth, R.F. and Goodman, A.C. (1989) The Economics of Housing Markets. London: Harwood Academic Publishers.
83.
Nelson, A.C. (1992) Effects of elevated heavy-rail transit stations on house prices with respect to neighborhood income, Transportation Research Record, 1359, pp. 127-132.
84.
Nelson, A.C. (1999) Transit stations and commercial property values: a case study with land-use policy implications, Journal of PublicTransportation, 2(3), pp. 77-93.
85.
New York State Office Of Planning Coordination ( 1969) The Buffalo-Amherst Corridor. Technical Report, New York State Office of Planning Coordination, Albany, NY.
86.
New York Statistical Information System (2005 ) New York State County population projections (http://www.nysis.cornell.edu/; accessed 31 May 2005 ).
87.
Nfta (Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority) (2001) Strategic transit assessment. Prepared for NFTA by Parsons Brinckerhoff, NFTA, Buffalo.
88.
Nfta (2004) Conceptual transit-oriented development plan for Allen-Medical Campus and Summer-Best station. Prepared for NFTA by Chan Krieger, NFTA, Buffalo.
89.
Nfta (2005) Historical bus ridership data. NFTA, Buffalo.
90.
Office Of Strategic Planning (2004) Queen city in the 21st century: Buffalo's comprehensive plan. Office of Strategic Planning, City of Buffalo.
91.
Palmquist, R. (1984) Estimating the demand for characteristics of housing , Review of Economics and Statistics, 66, pp. 394-404.
92.
Parsons Brinckerhoff (2001) The effects of rail transit on property values: a summary of studies. Project 21439S, Task 7, NEORail II, February, Cleveland, OH.
93.
Pendall, R. (2003) Sprawl without growth: the upstate paradox. Survey Series, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
94.
Pendall, R. and Christopherson, S. (2004) Losing ground: income and poverty in upstate New York, 1980-2000. Survey Series, Metropolitan Policy Program, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
95.
Pickrell, D.H. (1992) A desire named streetcar: fantasy and fact in rail transit planning, Journal of the American Planning Association , 58(2), pp. 158-176.
96.
Potepan, M.J. (1996) Explaining intrametropolitan variation in housing prices, rents, and land prices, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association Journal, 24(2), pp. 219-245.
97.
Quigley, J.M. (1979) What have we learned about urban housing markets? , in: P. Miesz-Kowski and M. Straszheim (Eds) Current Issues in Urban Economics, pp. 391-249. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
98.
Quigley, J.M. (1985) Consumer choice of dwelling, neighbourhood, and public services, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 15, pp. 41-63.
99.
Rice Center For Urban Mobility Research (1987 ) Assessment of changes in property values in transit areas. Preparedy for the Urban Mass Transit Administration, Rice University, Houston.
100.
Richmond, J. (2005) Transport of Delight: The Mythical Conception of Rail Transit in Los Angeles. Akron, OH: University of Akron Press.
101.
Rosen, S. (1974) Hedonic pricing and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition, Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), pp. 34-55.
102.
Ryan, S. (1999) Property values and transportation facilities: finding the transportation -land use connection, Journal of Planning Literature, 13(4), pp. 412-427.
103.
Ryan, S. (2005) The value of access to highway and light rail transit: evidence for industrial and office firms, UrbanStudies, 42(4), pp. 751-765.
104.
Schroeder, T.D. (1982) The relationship of local public parks and recreational services to residential property values, Journal of Leisure Research, 14(3), pp. 223-234.
105.
Skaburskis, A. (1982) Externalities and property prices: a test of the Schall hypothesis, Journal of Regional Science, 22(2), pp. 213-223.
106.
Smith, J.J. and Gihring, T.A. (2004) Financing transit systems through value capture: an annotated bibliography. Working paper, Victoria Transport Policy Institute Victoria, BC, Canada.
107.
Targa, F. and Clifton, K.J. (2005) Built environment and nonmotorized travel: evidence from Baltimore City using the NHTS, Journal of Transportation and Statistics, 8(3), pp. 55-70.
108.
Tcrp (Transit Cooperative Research Program) ( 1998) Economic impact analysis of transit investments: guidebookfor practitioners. Report No. 35, Transportation Research Board , Washington, DC.
109.
Umta (Urban Mass Transit Administration) ( 1989) Urban rail transit projects: forecast versus actual ridership and costs. US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. UNTERMANN, R. K. (1984) Accommodating the Pedestrian: Adapting Towns and Neighborhoods for Walking and Bicycling. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
110.
Vessali, K.V. (1996) Land use impacts of rapid transit: a review of the empirical literature, Berkeley Planning Journal, 11, pp. 71-105.
111.
Voith, R. (1993) Changing capitalization of CBDoriented transportation system: evidence from Philadelphia, 1970-1988, Journal of Urban Economics, 33, pp. 361-376.
112.
Voorhees And Associates (1976) Metro for Buffalo: transit alternatives for the Buffalo-Amherst corridor. Technical Report, Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority, Buffalo.
113.
Wallace McHarg Roberts & Todd (1971) The regional center: a comprehensive plan for downtown Buffalo, New York. City of Buffalo.
114.
Weinberger, R. (2000) Commercial property values and proximity to light rail: calculating benefits with a hedonic price model. Paper presented at the 79th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January.
115.
Weinberger, R. (2001) Light rail proximity: benefit or detriment? The case of Santa Clara County, California. Paper presented at the 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January.
116.
Weinstein, B.L. and Clower, T.L. (2002) An assessment of the DART light rail transit on taxable property valuations and transit-oriented development. Center for Economic Development and Research, University of North Texas, Denton .
117.
Weisbrod, G., Ben-Akiv, M. and Lerman, S. (1980) Tradeoffs in residential location decisions: transportation versus other factors, Transportation Policy and Decision-making , 1(1), pp. 1-14.
118.
Yinger, J. (1979) Estimating the relationship between location and the price of housing, Journal of Regional Science, 19(3), pp. 271-290.
