This study examines the proposition that secondary school choice in England has produced a stratified education system, compared with a counterfactual world where pupils are allocated into schools based strictly on proximity via a simulation that exploits the availability of pupil postcodes in the National Pupil Database. The study finds current levels of sorting in the English secondary school system-defined as pupils who do not attend their proximity allocation school-to be around 50 per cent, but estimates that only one-in-five pupils are potentially active in sorting between non-faith comprehensive schools. School segregation is almost always lower in the proximity counterfactual than in the actual data, confirming that where pupils are sorting themselves into a non-proximity school, it does tend to increase social and ability segregation. The difference between school and residential segregation is greatest in urban areas and LEAs with many pupils in grammar and voluntary-aided schools.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, R. and Vignoles, A. (2006) What should an index of school segregation measure? Discussion Paper, Centre for the Economics of Education, London School of Economics and Political Science ( http://cee.lse.ac.uk/pubs/default.asp).
2.
Ammermueller, A. and Pischke, J.-S. (2006) Peer effects in European primary schools: evidence from PIRLS CEE Discussion Paper (http://cee.lse.ac.uk/pubs/default.asp ).
3.
Black, S.E. (1999) Do better schools matter? Parental valuation of elementary education, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), pp. 577-599.
4.
Burgess, S., McConnell, B., Propper, C. and Wilson, D. (forthcoming) The impact of school choice on sorting by ability and socio-economic factors in English secondary education, in: L. Woessmann and P. Peterson (Eds) Schools and the Equal Opportunity Problem. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
Burgess, S., Propper, C. and Wilson, D. (2005) Will more choice improve outcomes in education and health care? The evidence from economic research. Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol.
6.
Carrington, W.J. and Troske, K.R. (1997) On measuring segregation in samples with small units, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 15(4), pp. 402-409.
7.
Cortese, C.F., Falk, R.F. and Cohen, J.K. (1976) Further considerations on the methodological analysis of segregation indices, American Sociological Review, 41, pp. 630-637.
8.
Croxford, L. (2000) Is free-meal entitlement a valid measure of school intake characteristics?, Educational Research and Evaluation , 6(4), pp. 317-335.
9.
Dfes (Department For Education And Employment) ( 1999) Code of Practice on School Admissions. London: HMSO.
10.
Feinstein, L. and Symons, J. (1999) Attainment in secondary school, Oxford Economic Papers, 51(2), pp. 300-321.
11.
Fitz, J., Taylor, C., Gorard, S. and White, P. (2001) Local education authorities and the regulation of educational markets: four case studies. School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University.
12.
Gewirtz, S., Ball, S. and Bowe, R. (1995) Markets, Choice and Equity in Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
13.
Gibbons, S. and Machin, S. (2003) Valuing English primary schools, Journal of Urban Economics, 53, pp. 197-219.
14.
Gibbons, S. and Machin, S. (2006) Paying for primary schools: admissions constraints, school popularity or congestion?, Economic Journal, 116, pp. C77-C92.
15.
Glennerster, H. (1991) Quasi-markets and education, Economic Journal, 101, pp. 1268-1271.
16.
Goldstein, H., and Noden, P. (2003) Modelling social segregation. Oxford Review of Education, 29, pp. 225-237.
17.
Gorard, S., Taylor, C. and Fitz, J. (2003) Schools, Markets and Choice Policies. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
18.
Hastings, J.S., Kane, T.J. and Steiger, D.O. (2005) Parental preferences and school competition: evidence from a public school choice program. Working Paper No. 11805, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
19.
Hoxby, C.M. (2003) Introduction, in: C. M. Hoxby (Ed.) The Economics of School Choice, pp. 1-22. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
20.
Hutchens, R.M. (2004) One measure of segregation, International Economic Review, 45(2), pp. 555-578.
21.
Jowett, S. (1995) Allocating secondary school places: a study of policy and practice. National Foundation for Educational Research, Slough .
22.
Ladd, H.F. (2002) School vouchers: a critical view, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(4), pp. 3-24.
23.
Leech, D. and Campos, E. (2001) Is comprehensive education really free? A case study of the effects of secondary school admissions policies on house prices in one local area Warwick Economic Research Paper No. 581, Warwick University.
24.
Levačić, R. (2004) Competition and the performance of English secondary schools: further evidence, Education Economics, 12(2), pp. 177-193.
25.
Levačić, R., Jenkins, A., Vignoles, A. ET AL. (2005) Estimating the relationship between school resources and pupil attainment at Key Stage 3. Research Report No. 679, DfES (www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RR679.pdf ).
26.
Mayet, G. (1996) Admissions to schools: a study of local education authorities, in: R. Glatter, P. A. Woods and C. Bagley (Eds) Choice and Diversity in Schooling: Perspectives and Prospects, pp. 166-177. London: Routledge .
27.
Noden, P. (2000) Rediscovering the impact of marketisation: dimensions of social segregation in England's secondary schools, 1994-1999, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(3), pp. 371-390.
28.
Parsons, E., Chalkley, B. and Jones, A. (2000) School catchments and pupil movements: a case study in parental choice, Educational Studies, 26(1), pp. 33-48.
29.
Robertson, D. and Symons, J. (2003) Do peer groups matter? Peer group versus schooling effects on academic attainment, Economica, 70(277), pp. 31-53.
30.
Roth, A.E. (1984) The evolution of the labor market for medical interns and residents: a case study in game theory, Journal of Political Economy, 92(6), pp. 991-1016.
31.
Select Committee For Education And Skills ( 2005) Session 2004-05, fifth report, secondary education (http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmeduski/86/8602.htm).
32.
Shuttleworth, I. (1995) The relationship between social deprivation, as measured by individual free school meal eligibility, and educational attainment at GCSE in Northern Ireland: a preliminary investigation, British Educational Research Journal, 21(4), pp. 487-504.
33.
Waslander, S. and Thrupp, M. (1995) Choice, competition and segregation: an empirical analysis of a New Zealand secondary school market, Journal of Education Policy, 10(1), pp. 1-26.
34.
West, A. and Pennell, H. (2003) Underachievement in Schools. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
35.
West, A., Hind, A. and Pennell, H. (2004) School admissions and 'selection' in comprehensive schools: policy and practice, Oxford Review of Education, 30(3), pp. 347-369.
36.
Willms, J. and Echols, F. (1992) Alert and inert clients: the Scottish experience of parental choice of schools, Economics of Education Review , 11(4), pp. 339-359.
37.
van Zanten, A. (1996) Market trends and the French school system: overt policy, hidden strategies, actual changes, Oxford Studies in Comparative Education, 6, pp. 63-76.
38.
Zimmer, R.W. and Toma, E.F. (2000) Peer effects in private schools and public schools across countries, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management , 19(1), pp. 75-92.
39.
Zoloth, B. (1976) Alternative measures of school segregation, Land Economics, 52, pp. 278-298.
