This paper considers the recommendations of the Allsopp Review on the adequacy of UK regional economic statistics. It raises general concerns over the philosophy underpinning the review and specific questions as to whether the review's recommendations are sufficient to operate effectively the present UK regional policy regime. In particular, the institutional arrangements that make up the 'new localism' in UK regional policy have data requirements that are more extensive than simply monitoring performance against government targets. Many of these in formational requirements were simply not considered or were given an inappropriately low weight in the Review's deliberations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Akerloff, G.A. (1970) The market for lemons: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, pp. 488-500.
2.
Allsopp, C. (2003) Review of Statistics for Economic Policymaking: First Report to the Chancellor of the Exchequer, the Governor of the Bank of England and the National Statistician. London: HMSO.
3.
Allsopp, C. (2004) Review of Statistics for Economic Policymaking: Final Report to the Chancellor of the Exchequer, the Governor of the Bank of England and the National Statistician. London: HMSO.
4.
Armstrong, H. and Taylor, J. (2000) Regional Economics and Policy, 3rd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
5.
Bachtler, J. and Yuill, D. (2001) Policies and strategies for regional development: a shift in paradigm. Regional and Industrial Policy Research Paper No. 46 , European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde .
6.
Balls, E. (2002) The new localism: devolution and localism in public policy-a view from the Treasury. Speech by the Chief Economic Advisor to the Treasury, CIPFA Annual Conference, June.
7.
Balls, E., O'Donnell, G. and Bhundia, A. (2002) The UK model of central bank independence: an assessment , in: E. Balls and G. O'Donnell (Eds) Reforming Britain's Economic and Finance Policy, pp. 85-109. Basing-stoke: Palgrave .
8.
Bernanke, B. and Mishkin, F. (1997) Inflation targeting: a new framework for monetary policy?, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11, pp. 97-116.
9.
Briscoe, S. (2005) Health service charts exaggerate rise in staffing levels, Financial Times, 5 January.
10.
Buchanan, J. (1987) The constitution of economic policy, American Economic Review, 77, pp. 243-250.
11.
Cameron, S. (2006) Mandarin dynasty, Financial Times Weekend Magazine, 8 April.
12.
Dixit, A.K. (1996) The Making of Economic Policy: A Transaction-cost Politics Perspective. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
13.
Dti (Department Of Trade And Industry) (2003 ) Single Programme Appraisal Guidance, Version 7f. London: The Stationery Office.
14.
Fuller, C., Bennett, R.J. and Ramsden, M. (2002) The economic development role of English RDAs: the need for greater discretionary power, Regional Studies , 36, pp. 421-428.
15.
Gillespie, G., McGregor, P.G., Swales, J.K. and Yin, Y.P. (2001) The displacement and multiplier effects of regional selective assistance: a computable general equilibrium analysis, Regional Studies, 35, pp. 125-139.
16.
Gillespie, G., McGregor, P.G., Swales, J.K. and Yin, Y.P. (2002) A computable general equilibrium approach to the ex post evaluation of regional development agency policies, in: B. JoHANSSoN, C. Karlsson and R. G. Stough (Eds) Regional Policies and Comparative Advantage, pp. 253-282. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
17.
Goodwin, M., Jones, M. and Jones, R. (2005) Devolution, constitutional change and economic development: explaining and understanding the new institutional geographies of the British state, Regional Studies, 39, pp. 421-436.
18.
Halkier, H. (2006) Institutions, Discourse and Development: The Scottish Development Agency and the Politics of Regional Policy. Brussells: PIE-Peter Lang.
19.
Hm Treasury (1995) A framework for the evaluation of regeneration projects and programmes . HM Treasury, London.
20.
Hm Treasury (1997) Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government: Treasury Guidance , 2nd edn. London: HMSO.
21.
Hm Treasury (2001) Productivity in the UK: 3-The Regional Dimension. London : The Stationery Office.
22.
Hm Treasury (2002) Public Service Agreements, 2003-2006. London: The Stationery Office.
23.
Hm Treasury (2003) Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government: Treasury Guidance , 3rd edn. London: The Stationery Office .
24.
Hm Treasury/Dti/Odpm (2003) A Modern Regional Policy for the United Kingdom. London : The Stationery Office.
25.
Hm Treasury/Dti/Odpm (2004) Devolving Decision Making: 2 - Meeting the Regional Economic Challenge: Increasing Regional and Local Flexibility. London: The Stationery Office.
26.
House Of Commons (2003) Select Committee on Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions, 9th Report. London: HMSO.
27.
Laffont, J.-J. and Martimort, D. (2002) The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
Learmonth, D. and Swales, J.K. (2004) Policy spillovers in a regional target-setting regime. Strathclyde Discussion Papers in Economics No. 04-24, Department of Economics, University of Strathclyde.
29.
McVittie, E. and Swales, J.K. (2003) Regional policy evaluation: ignorance, evidence and influence. Strathclyde Discussion Papers in Economics No. 03-05, Department of Economics, University of Strathclyde.
30.
Mcvittie, E. and Swales, J.K. (2006) 'Constrained discretion' in UK monetary and regional policy, Regional Studies (forthcoming).
31.
Morgan, K. (2004) Bonfire of the QUANGOs: the missing debate, Agenda, November, pp. 20-23.
32.
Nao (National Audit Office) (2003) Success in the Regions. Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, HC 1268. London: The Stationery Office .
33.
Nolan, F. (2003) Report on the review of regional accounts: withdrawal of November 2002 revised regional accounts 1989-1999. Office of National Statistics, London.
34.
Odpm (Office Of The Deputy Prime Minister) ( 2003) Assessing the impacts of spatial interventions: regeneration, renewal and regional development: main guidance. Final Draft, Interdepartmental Group on the EGRUP Review, September.
35.
Pearce, G. and Ayres, S. (2007) Emerging patterns of governance in the English regions: the role of regional assemblies, Regional Studies (forthcoming).
36.
Phillis, B. (2004) An Independent Review of Government Communications . London: HMSO.
37.
Pickford, S., Cunningham, J., Lynch, R. ET AL. (1989) Government Economic Statistics: A Scrutiny Report. London: HMSO.
38.
Powell, M. (2004) In search of new and old localism. Paper presented at the ESPAnet Conference, Oxford.
39.
Rallings, C. and Thrasher, M. (2005) Why the North East said no: the 2004 referendum on an elected regional assembly. Briefing No. 19, Findings from the ESRC Research Programme on Devolution and Constitutional Change.
40.
Rayner, D. (1981) Rayner Report on the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, Cmnd. 8239. London: HMSO.
41.
Roberts, P. and Benneworth, P. (2001) Pathways to the future? An initial assessment of RDA Strategies and their contribution to integrated regional development, Local Economy, 16, pp. 142-159.
42.
The Stationery Office (1998) Regional Development Agencies Act 1998. London: The Stationery Office.
43.
Swales, J.K. (2005) Resource constrained export-base regional multipliers: a Northian approach, Journal of Regional Science, 45, pp. 223-250.
44.
Tewdwr-Jones, M. and Phelps, N.A. (2000) Levelling the uneven playing field: inward investment, interregional rivalry and the planning system, Regional Studies , 34, pp. 429-440.
45.
Tirole, J. (1994) The internal organisation of government, Oxford Economic Papers, 46, pp. 1-29.
46.
Wilson, J. (1990) Bureaucracy. New York: Basic Books.
