'New' regionalism privileges social communication over political 'coercion' as a means to motivate intermunicipal, interagency and multiactor co-operation in metropolitan regions. Critics claim, however, that the NR is little more than urban crisis management within increasingly unstable post-Fordist and neo-liberal environments. This analysis of emerging 'smart growth' strategies in North America offers a 'pragmatic', context-sensitive and critical reading of region-building in 'advanced capitalist transformation'. Issues at stake involve integral approaches to regional competitiveness, social equity, housing, redevelopment, transport, the environment, public services, etc. As will be demonstrated, however, this more global set of goals is translated locally into action, resulting in highly variegated regional governance landscapes that reflect both specific socio-political and economic contexts and the historical continuity of urban governance reform processes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abag (Association Of Bay Area Governments) ( 2000) Projections 2000. Oakland, CA: ABAG.
2.
Abag (2002) Smart Growth Strategy/Regional Livability Footprint Project. Shaping the Future of the Nine-County Bay Area (Final Report). Oakland, CA: ABAG (www.abag.ca.gov/planning/smartgrowth).
3.
Abag (2004) Projections 2005. Forecasts for the San Francisco Bay Area in the Year 2030. Oakland, CA: ABAG.
4.
Abag (2005) Regional housing needs program funding in jeopardy, Service Matters, July/ August (www.abag.gov.ca).
5.
Barnes, W. and Ledebur, L. (1998) The New Regional Economies: The U.S. Common Market and the Global Economy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Bay Area Economic Forum (2006) The Innovation Economy: Protecting the Talent Advantage. San Francisco, CA: Bay Area Economic Forum (www.bayeconfor.org).
7.
Basolo, V. (2003) US regionalism and rationality, UrbanStudies, 40, pp. 447-462.
8.
Boudreau, J.-A. (1999) MegacityToronto: struggles over differing aspects of middle-class politics, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23, pp. 771-781.
9.
Brenner, N. (2002) Decoding the newest 'metropolitan regionalism' in the USA: a critical overview, Cities, 19, pp. 3-21.
10.
Brenner, N. (2004) Urban governance and the production of new state spaces in western Europe, 1960-2000, Review of International Political Economy, 11(3), pp. 447-488.
11.
Breznau, S. (2004) The San Jose case study: Ohlone-Chynomweth station , in: H. Dittmar and G. Ohland (Eds) The New Transit Town: Best Practices in Transit Oriented Development, pp. 194-209. Washington, DC: Island Press.
12.
Calthorpe, P. and Fulton, W. (2000) The Regional City: Planning for the End of Sprawl . Washington, DC: Island Press .
13.
Cervero, R. and Landis, J. (1997) Twenty years of BART: land use and development impacts, Transportation Research A, 31, pp. 309-333.
14.
Chen, D. (2000) The science of smart growth, Scientific American, December, pp. 84-91.
15.
Courchene, T.J. (2001) Ontario as a North American region-state, Toronto as a global city region: responding to the NAFTA challenge, in: A. J. Scott (Ed.) Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy , pp. 158-190. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
Cullingworth, J.B. and Caves, R.W. (2003) Planning in the USA: Policies, Issues and Processes . London: Routledge.
17.
Dear, M.J. and Flusty, S. (2002) Introduction: how to map a radical break, in: M. J. Dear and S. Flusty (Eds) The Spaces of Postmodernity, pp. 1-12. London : Blackwell.
18.
Dowall, D. (1984) The Suburban Squeeze: Land Conversion and Regulation in the San Francisco Bay Area. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
19.
Evenden, L.J. (1995) The Future of the Metro Model. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001) Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Fulton, W. (2000) Growing smart in southern California. Report for the Workshop on Building a Sustainable Metropolis, Southern California Studies Center, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, November.
22.
Gibson, K.J. (2004) Urban redevelopment in Portland: making the city livable for everyone?, in: C. Ozawa (Ed.) The Portland Edge: Challenges and Success in Growing Communities , pp. 61-83. Washington, DC: The Island Press.
23.
Goldman, T. and Deakin, E. (2000) Regionalism through partnerships? Metropolitan planning since ISTEA, Berkeley Planning Journal, 14, pp. 46-75.
24.
Hales, C. (2001) The Portland experience, in: M. Freire and R. Stren (Eds) The Challenges of Urban Government: Policies and Practices, pp. 281-286. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
25.
Hall, J.S. (2004) Who will govern American metropolitan regions? , in: D. Phares (Ed.) Metropolitan Governance without Metropolitan Government?, pp. 7-33. Aldershot : Ashgate.
26.
Hayden, D. (2003) Building Suburbia: Green Fields and Urban Growth, 1820-2000. New York: Pantheon Books .
27.
Henton, D. (2001) Lessons from Silicon valley: governance in a global city-region, in: A. J. Scott (Ed.) Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy, pp. 391-400. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
28.
Herrschel, T. and Newman, P. (2002) Governance of Europe's City Regions: Planning, Policy and Politics. London: Routledge .
29.
Hicks, D.A. (1987) Urban policy in the US: introduction, Urban Studies, 24, pp. 439-446.
30.
Institute For Local Self Government (2001) Ballot box planning: understanding land use initiatives in California . Institute for Local Self Government, Sacramento, California (http://www.ilsg.org/resource_files/21962.bboxfinal.PDF ).
31.
Johnston, R.J. (1996) Paradigms and revolution or evolution?, in: J. Agnew, D. N. Livingstone and A. Rogers (Eds) Human Geography: An Essential Anthology, pp. 37-53. London : Blackwell.
32.
Keating, M. (1998) The New Regionalism in Western Europe: Territorial Restructuring and Political Change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
33.
Kent, T.J. (1970) Open space for the San Francisco Bay Area: organizing to guide metropolitan growth. Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
34.
Kreyling, C. (2001) Hug that transit station, Planning , 67, pp. 4-9.
35.
Kunstler, J.H. (1993) The Geography of Nowhere: The Rise and Decline of America's Man-made Landscape. New York: Simon and Schuster.
36.
Kunstler, J.H. (2001) The City in Mind: Notes on the Urban Condition . New York: Simon and Schuster .
Leo, C. with Beavis, M., Carver, A. and Turner, R. (1998) Is urban sprawl back on the political agenda? Local growth control, regional growth management, and politics, Urban Affairs Review, 3, pp. 179-212.
39.
Lindstrom, M.J. and Bartling, H. (2003) Introduction, in: M. J. Lindstrom and H. Bartling (Eds) Suburban Sprawl: Culture, Theory and Politics, pp. xi-xxvii. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
40.
Lydon, P. (1993) San Francisco's Bay Vision 2020 Commission: a civic initiative for change. Working Paper No. 93-25, Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California at Berkeley.
41.
MacLeod, G. (2001) New regionalism reconsidered: globalization, regulation and the recasting of political economic space, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25, pp. 804-829.
42.
Magnet, M. (Ed.) (2000) The Millennial City: A New Urban Paradigm for 21st Century America. Chicago, IL: Ivan R. Dee.
43.
Mta (Metropolitan Transportation Commission) ( 2001) 2001Regional Transportation Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area. MTA, Oakland, CA (www.mta.ca.gov).
44.
Pastor, M., Dreier, P., Grigsby, J.E. and Lopez-Garza, M. (2000) Regions That Work: How Cities and Suburbs Can Grow Together. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
45.
Peirce, N.R. (1993) Citistates: How Urban America Can Prosper in a Competitive World. Washington, DC: Seven Locks Press.
46.
Persky, J. and Wievel, W. (1998) When Cities Lose Jobs: The Costs and Benefits of Metropolitan Employment Deconcentration. Chicago, IL: Great Cities Institute (University of Chicago).
47.
Prince, T.J. (2004) Portland's response to homeless issues and the broken windows theory, in: C. Ozawa (Ed.) The Portland Edge: Challenges and Success in Growing Communities , pp. 280-301. Washington, DC: The Island Press.
48.
Rerc (Real Estate Research Corporation) (1974 ) The Costs of Sprawl. Chicago, IL: RERC.
49.
Rorty, R. (1991) Objectivism, Relativism and Truth. Philosphical Papers, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Rothblatt, D.N. (1982) Planning the Metropolis: The Multiple Advocacy Approach. New York: Praeger Publishers .
51.
Rothblatt, D.N. (1999) North American metropolitan planning reexamined, Working Paper No. 99-2, Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California at Berkeley.
52.
Rothblatt, D.N. and Jones, V. (1998) Governance of the San Francisco Bay Area revisited , in: D. N. Rothblatt and A. Sancton (Eds) Metropolitan Governance Revisited: American/ Canadian Perspectives, pp. 407-473. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies Press.
53.
Salet, W., Thornley, A. and Kreukels, A. (2003) Practices of metropolitan governance in Europe: experiences and lessons, in: W. Salet , A. Thornley and A. Kreukels (Eds) Metropolitan Governance and Spatial Planning, pp. 377-390. London: Spon Press.
54.
Sancton, A. (2001) Canadian cities and the new regionalism, Journal of Urban Affairs, 23, pp. 543-555.
55.
Schrag, P. (1999) Paradise Lost: California's Experience, America's Future. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
56.
Scott, A.J. (1998) Regions and the World Economy: The Coming Shape of Global Production, Competition and Political Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57.
ScoTT, A. J. (Ed.) (2001) Global City Regions, Trends, Theory, Policy. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
58.
Scott, J. (1990) Bürgerinitiativen gegen Stadtewachstum. Direkte Demokratie und Kommunalpolitik in Kalifornien, Archiv für Kommunalwissenschaften, 29, pp. 53-69.
59.
Scott, J. (1992) The Challenge of the Regional City: Political Traditions, the Planning Process and Their Roles in Metropolitan Growth Management. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.
60.
Scott, J. (2005) New Regionalism and the Metropolis: Spatial Politics of Urban Reform in the United States, Canada and Germany. Postdoctoral thesis , Department of Geography, Free University of Berlin.
61.
Scott, M. (1985) The San Francisco Bay Area: A Metropolis in Perspective . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
62.
Seltzer, E. (2004) It's not an experiment: regional planning at Metro, 1990 to the present, in: C. Ozawa (Ed.) The Portland Edge: Challenges and Success in Growing Communities , pp. 35-60. Washington, DC: The Island Press.
63.
Stewart, L. (2006) Homing in on housing: a regional focus, Bay Area Monitor, 31, pp. 4-5 ( www.bayareamonitor.org).
64.
Tomaney, J. and Ward, N. (2000) England and the new regionalism, Regional Studies, 34, pp. 471-478.
65.
Transportation Research Board (1998) The Costs of Sprawl-Revisited, TCRP Report, No. 39 (www.TRB.org).
66.
Transportation Research Board (2004) Transit-oriented development in the United States: experiences, challenges, and prospect. TCRP Report102 (www.TRB.org).
67.
Uli (The Urban Land Institute) (2002) Putting the Pieces Together: State Actions to Encourage Smart Growth Practices in California. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
68.
Vance, J.E. (1964) Geography and urban evolution in the San Francisco Bay Area. Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
69.
Vogel, R.K. and Nezelkiewicz, N. (2002) Metropolitan planning organisations and the new regionalism, Publius: The Journal of Federalism , 32, pp. 107-129.
70.
Wallis, A. (1994) Inventing regionalism: the first two waves, National Civic Review, 83, pp. 159-176.
71.
Wheeler, S.M. (2002) The new regionalism: characteristics of an emerging movement, Journal of the American Planning Association, 68, pp. 267-278.
72.
Whyte, W.H. (1968) The Last Landscape. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
73.
Wievel, W., Persky, J. and Sendzik, M. (1999) Private benefits and public costs: policies to address suburban sprawl, Policy Studies Journal, 27, pp. 96-114.
74.
Wood, S.E. and Heller, A.E. (1962) California Going, Going. Sacramento, CA: California Tomorrow.
75.
Young, K. (1975) Metropology revisited: on the political integration of metropolitan areas, in: K. Young (Ed.) Essays on the Study of Urban Politics, pp. 152-156. London : Macmillan.
76.
Zimmerman, M. (1999) Developing near transit, Urban Land, 58, pp. 100-103.
