Recent interest in the urban transport challenges posed by the demographic outlook of ageing societies has prompted a growing body of scholarship on the subject. The focus of this paper is on the topic of elderly trip generation and the development of models to help formalise some important relationships between trip-making behaviour and personal, household and contextual variables (such as location). The case study is the Hamilton Metropolitan Area-an important functional component of Greater Toronto, itself one of the regions in Canada where the impact of ageing is expected to be most strongly felt. Using data from Toronto's Transport Tomorrow Survey and mixed ordered probit models, the study investigates the question of spatial and demographic variability in trip-making behaviour. The results support the proposition that trip-making propensity decreases with age. However, it is also found that this behaviour is not spatially homogeneous and in fact exhibits a large degree of variability-a finding that highlights both the challenges of planning transport for the elderly and the potential of spatial analytical approaches to improve transport modelling practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agyemang-Duah, K. and Hall, F.L. (1997) Spatial transferability of an ordered response model of trip generation, Transportation Research Part A, 31(5), pp. 389-402.
2.
Alsnih, R. and Hensher, D.A. (2003) The mobility and accessibility expectations of seniors in an aging population, Transportation Research Part A, 37(10), pp. 903-916.
3.
Anselin, L. and Griffith, D.A. (1988) Do spatial effects really matter in regression-analysis?, Papers of theRegional Science Association, 65, pp. 11-34.
4.
Badoe, D.A. and Chen, C.C. (2004) Unit of analysis in conventional trip generation modelling: an investigation, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering , 31(2), pp. 272-280.
5.
Badoe, D.A. and Steuart, G.N. (1997) Urban and travel changes in the Greater Toronto Area and the transferability of trip-generation models, Transportation Planning and Technology, 20(4), pp. 267-290.
6.
Bhat, C. and Zhao, H.M. (2002) The spatial analysis of activity stop generation , Transportation Research Part B, 36(6), pp. 557-575.
7.
Boarnet, M.G. and Sarmiento, S. (1998) Can land-use policy really affect travel behaviour? A study of the link between non-work travel and land-use characteristics, Urban Studies, 35(7), pp. 1155-1169.
8.
Cvitkovich, Y. andWister, A. (2001) The importance of transportation and prioritization of environmental needs to sustain well-being among older adults, Environment and Behavior, 33(6), pp. 809-829.
9.
Data Management Group (1997) Transportation Tomorrow Survey 1996: design and conduct of the survey. Joint Program in Transportation, University of Toronto (http://www.jpint.utoronto.ca/PDF/conduct.pdf).
10.
Duncan, C. and Jones, K. (2000) Using multilevel models to model heterogeneity: potential and pitfalls, Geographical Analysis, 32(4), pp. 279-305.
11.
Franklin, J.P. and Niemeier, D.A. (1998) Discrete choice elasticities for elderly and disabled travelers between fixed-route transit and paratransit, Transit , 1623, pp. 31-36.
12.
Gardiner, C. and Hill, R. (1996) Analysis of access to cars from the 1991 UK census samples of anonymised records: a case study of the elderly population of Sheffield , Urban Studies, 33(2), pp. 269-281.
13.
Griffith, D.A. and Layne, L.J. (1999) A Casebook for Spatial Statistical Data Analysis: A Compilation of Analyses of Different Thematic Data Sets. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
Harrison, A. and Ragland, D.R. (2003) Consequences of driving reduction or cessation for older adults, Transportation Research Record, 1843, pp. 96-104.
15.
Hayward, L.M. (2001) Local planning for an aging population in Ontario: two case studies (http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/∼sedap/p/sedap47.pdf).
16.
Hedeker, D. and Gibbons, R.D. (1994) A random-effects ordinal regression-model for multilevel analysis, Biometrics, 50(4), pp. 933-944.
17.
Hedeker, D. and Gibbons, R.D. (1996) MIXOR: a computer program for mixed-effects ordinal regression analysis, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine , 49(2), pp. 157-176.
18.
Hildebrand, E.D. (2003) Dimensions in elderly travel behaviour: a simplified activity-based model using lifestyle clusters, Transportation , 30(3), pp. 285-306.
19.
Jones, K. (1991) Specifying and estimating multilevel models for geographical research, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 16(2), pp. 148-159.
20.
Kim, S. ( 2003) Analysis of elderly mobility by structural equation modeling , Transportation Research Record, 1854, pp. 81-89.
21.
Kim, S. and Ulfarsson, G.F. (2004) Travel mode choice of the elderly: effects of personal, household, neighborhood, and trip characteristics, Transportation Research Record, 1894, pp. 117-126.
22.
Maddala, G.S. (1983) Limited-dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Maoh, H., Kanaroglou, P., Scott, D.M. ET AL. (2005) A GIS-based decision support tool to study the impact of elderly population on the transportation system in Hamilton Census Metropolitan Area (CMA). Proceedings of the 2005 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Transportation Research Forum, Hamilton, ON, August.
24.
McMillen, D.P. (1992) Probit with spatial autocorrelation, Journal of Regional Science, 32(3), pp. 335-348.
25.
Mercado, R.G., Páez, A., Newbold, K.B. ET AL. (2006) Transport policy in ageing societies: an international comparison and implications for Canada. Paper presented to the 85th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, January.
26.
Meyer, M.D. and Miller, E.J. (2001) Urban Transportation Planning, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27.
Miller, E.J., Dalton, P. and Briggs, R. (1998) GTA trip generation rates 1986-1996. Joint Program in Transportation, University of Toronto (http://www.jpint.utoronto.ca/PDF/tripgen.pdf).
28.
Miller, H.J. (1999) Potential contributions of spatial analysis to geographic information systems for transportation (GIS-T), Geographical Analysis, 31(4), pp. 373-399.
29.
Miller, H.J. and Shaw, S.L. (2001) Geographic Information Systems for Transportation: Principles and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
Newbold, K.B., Scott, D.M., Spinney, J.E.L. ET AL. (2005) Travel behavior within Canada's older population: a cohort analysis, Journal of Transport Geograhy, 13(4), pp. 340-351.
31.
Ortúzar, J.D. and Willumsen, L.G. (2001) Modelling Transport, 3rd edn. New York: Wiley.
32.
Páez, A. and Scott, D.M. (2004) Spatial statistics for urban analysis: a review of techniques with examples, GeoJournal, 61(1), pp. 53-67.
33.
Pas, E.I. (1978) Empirical comparison of zonal, household and personal models of home-based trip generation, Traffic Engineering & Control, 19(2), pp. 64-68.
34.
Pisarski, A.E. (2003) Prescriptions for research: reviewing the history of TRB's critical issues in transportation, Transport Research News, 226, pp. 30-35.
35.
Redmond, L.S. and Mokhtarian, P.L. (2001) The positive utility of the commute: modeling ideal commute time and relative desired commute amount , Transportation, 28(2), pp. 179-205.
36.
Rosenbloom, S. (2001) Sustainability and automobility among the elderly: an international assessment, Transportation, 28(4), pp. 375-408.
37.
Schmocker, J.D., Quddus, M.A., Noland, R.B. and Bell, M.G.H. (2005a) Estimating trip generation of elderly and disabled people: an analysis of London data. Paper presented to the 84th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, January.
38.
Schmocker, J.D., Quddus, M.A., Noland, R.B. and Bell, M.G.H. (2005b) Transport mode choice of the elderly and disabled in London. Paper presented to the 84th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, January.
39.
Scott, D.M. and Axhausen, K.W. (2005) Household mobility tool ownership: modeling interactions between cars and season tickets, Transportation, 32, pp. 311-328.
40.
Scott, D.M. and Kanaroglou, P.S. (2002) An activity-episode generation model that captures interactions between household heads: development and empirical analysis, Transportation Research Part B, 36(10), pp. 875-896.
41.
Smith, G.C. (1998) Change in elderly residential segregation in Canadian metropolitan areas, 1981-91, Revue Canadienne du Vieillissement , 17(1), pp. 59-82.
42.
Smith, G.C. and Sylvestre, G.M. (2001) Determinants of the travel behavior of the suburban elderly, Growth and Change, 32(3), pp. 395-412.
43.
Stern, S. (1993) A disaggregate discrete-choice model of transportation demand by elderly and disabled people in rural Virginia, Transportation Research Part A, 27(4), pp. 315-327.
44.
Tacken, M. (1998) Mobility of the elderly in time and space in the Netherlands: an analysis of the Dutch National Travel Survey, Transportation, 25(4), pp. 379-393.
45.
Train, K. (2003) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Waldorf, B. (2003) Automobile reliance among the elderly: race and spatial context effects, Growth and Change, 34(2), pp. 175-201.
47.
Washington, S. (2000) Iteratively specified tree-based regression: theory and trip generation example, Journal of Transportation Engineering-Asce , 126(6), pp. 482-491.
