Taking as a subject of study an on-going urban development project in Santiago, Chile, the paper interprets how public and private actors came together in an urban decision-making episode which represented a particular power configuration. To consider both the structural forms of constraint and the differential capacity of actors to exert power, an analytical framework is constructed, derived from Giddens' structuration theory and from Foucault's approach to power. The analysis of the specific relationships established between the project's participants shows how individuals from the central state apparatus and private investors were controlling local redevelopment, relegating the local government (the municipality) and the people living near the project to non-influential positions. The concluding section considers the potentials and limitations of the analytical framework deployed and the degree to which its outcome could be generalised to the Chilean situation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Acioly, C. (2001) Reviewing urban revitalisation strategies in Rio de Janeiro: from urban project to urban management approaches, Geoforum, 32(4), pp. 509-520.
2.
Adams, D. and Hastings, E.M. (2001) Assessing institutional relations in development partnerships: the Land Development Corporation and the Hong Kong government prior to 1997, Urban Studies, 38(9), pp. 1473-1492.
3.
Basset, K., Griffiths, R. and Smith, I. (2002) Testing governance: partnership, planning and conflict in waterfront regeneration, UrbanStudies, 39(10), pp. 1757-1775.
4.
Borsdorf, A. and Hidalgo, R. (2004) Formas tempranas de exclusion residencial y el modelo de la ciudad cerrada en America Latina, Revista de Geografia Norte Grande, 32(1), pp. 21-38.
5.
Borsdorf, A. and Hidalgo, R. (2005) Los Megadisenos residenciales vallados en las periferias de las metropolis latinoamericanas y el advenimiento de un nuevo cocepto de cindad: Alcanes en base al caso de Santiago de Chile, Scripta Nova, 194(3) (http://www.ub.es/geocrit/sn/sn-194-03.htm).
6.
Boyne, R. (1991) Power-knowledge and social theory: the systematic misinterpretation of contemporary French social theory in the work of Anthony Giddens, in: C. Bryant and D. Jary (Eds) Giddens' Theory of Structuration: A Critical Appreciation, pp. 52-73. London: Routledge.
7.
Cariola, C. and Lacabana, M. (2003) La metropolis fragmentada: Caracas entre la pobreza y la marginalizacion, Eure, 27(80), pp. 9-32.
8.
Carruthers, D. (2001) Environmental politics in Chile: legacies of dictatorship and democracy, Third World Quarterly, 22(3), pp. 343-358.
9.
Cavarozzi, M. (1992) Patterns of elite negotiation and confrontation in Argentina and Chile, in: J. Highley and R. Gunther (Eds) Elites and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe, pp. 208-236. Melbourne : Cambridge University Press.
10.
Child, J. (1997) Strategic choice in the analysis of action, structure, organizations and environment: retrospect and prospect, Organization Studies, 18(1), pp. 43-76.
11.
Ciccolella, P. (1999) Globalizacion y dualizacion en la region metropolitana de Buenos Aires: grandes inversiones y reestructuracion socio territorial en los anos noventa, Eure, 24(73), pp. 5-28.
12.
Clegg, S. (1989) Frameworks of power. London : Sage.
13.
Contreras, Y. (2004) Analisis preliminar de los proyectos Portal Bicentenario y Ribera Norte. Unpublished document. Santiago, Chile.
14.
Cortes, I. (2005) Construcción social del territorio: los límites de la gestión local en Pudahuel. Unpublished document. Santiago, Chile.
15.
Dear, M. (1995) Prolegomena to modern urban-ism, in: P. Healey, S. Cameron, S. Davoudi ET AL. (Eds) Managing Cities: The New Urban Context, pp. 27-44. Chichester : J. Wiley.
16.
De Mattos, C.A. (1996) Avances de la globalización y nueva dinamica metropolitana: Santiago de Chile, 1975-1995, Eure, 22(65), pp. 39-60.
17.
De Mattos, C.A. (1998) Reestructuracion, globalización, nuevo poder economico y territorio en el Chile de los noventa, in: C. A. de Mattos, D. Hiernaux and D. Restrepo (Eds) Globalización y territorio: Impactos y perspectiva, pp. 42-70. Santiago: Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile.
18.
De Mattos, C.A. (1999) Santiago de Chile, globalización y expansion metropolitana: lo que existia sigue existiendo, Eure, 25(76), pp. 29-56.
19.
De Mattos, C.A. (2003) Globalizacion y transformación metropolitana en el caso de Santiago, in: F. Arenas, R. Hidalgo and J. L. Coll (Eds) Los nuevos modos de gestión de la metropolización , pp. 27-56. Santiago: Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile .
20.
Dockemdorff, E., Rodriguez, A. and Winchester, L. (2000) Santiago de Chile: metropolization, globalization and inequity, Environment & Urbanization, 12(1), pp. 171-183.
21.
Elias, N. (2000) The Civilizing Process. Oxford : Blackwell.
22.
Elkin, S. (1987) City and Urban Regimes in the American Republic . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23.
Foucault, M. (1979) The History of Sexuality. Volume 1: An Introduction . London: Guilford.
24.
Foucault, M. (1980) Power and strategies, in: C. Gordon (Ed.) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, pp. 134-145. New York: Pantheon Books.
25.
Foucault, M. (1982) The subject and power, in: H. L. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow (Eds) Michel Foucault, Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, pp. 208-226. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
26.
Foucault, M. (1995) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison . New York: Vintage Books.
27.
Galjart, B. and Silva, P. (1995) Knowledge, expertise and political power: intellectual and technocrats in developing countries, in: B. Galjart and P. Silva (Eds) Designers and Development: Intellectuals in the Third World , pp. 1-18. Leiden : Leiden University.
28.
Giddens, A. (1979) Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. London: Macmillan.
29.
Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
30.
Giddens, A. (1989) A reply to my critics, in: D. Held and J. Thompson (Eds) Social Theory of Modern Society: Anthony Giddens and His Critics, pp. 249-301. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Gregory, D. (1980) Human agency and human geography, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 6, pp. 1-18.
32.
Gregory, D. (1985) Suspended animation: the stasis of diffusion theory , in: D. Gregory and J. Urry (Eds) Social Relations and Spatial Structures, pp. 296-336. Basingstoke: Macmillan .
33.
Gregson, N. (1987) On duality and dualism: the case of structuration and time geography, Environment and Planning D, 5, pp. 184-205.
34.
Gregson, N. (1989) On the (ir)relevance of structuration theory to empirical research, in: D. Held and J. Thompson (Eds) Social Theory of Modern Society: Anthony Giddens and His Critics, pp. 235-248. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
35.
Hall, T. and Hubbard, P. (1996) The entrepreneurial city: new urban politics, new urban geographies?, Progress in Human Geography, 20(2), pp. 153-174.
36.
Harvey, D. (1982) The Limits to Capital. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37.
Harvey, D. (1989a) The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Blackwell.
38.
Harvey, D. (1989b) From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation in urban governance in late capitalism, Geografiska Annaler, 71, pp. 3-17.
39.
Hidalgo, R. (2004) De los pequenos condominios a la ciudad vallada: las urbanizaciones cerradas y la nueva geografia social en Santiago de Chile , Eure, 30(91), pp. 29-52.
40.
Hidalgo, R. and Arenas, F. (2003) Los espacios metropolitanos chilenos en el periodo 1992-2002, in: F. Arenas, R. Hidalgo and J. L. Coll (Eds) Los nuevos modos de gestión de la metropolizacion , pp. 112-126. Santiago: Instituto de Geografia de la Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile.
41.
Hidalgo, R. and Zunino, H. (2005) Expansion residencial en las comunas de las areas metropolitanos de Santiago y Valparaiso: efectos socio-espaciales y lectura de las relaciones de poder entre los agentes urbanos (1992-2005). Unpublished manuscript, Proyecto Fondecyt.
42.
Hubbard, P. (1996) Urban design and city regeneration: social representations of entrepreneurial landscapes, UrbanStudies, 33(8), pp. 1441-1461.
43.
Keeling, D. (1999) Neoliberal reforms and landscape change in Buenos Aires, Argentina, Conference of Latin Americanist Geographers , 15, pp. 15-32.
44.
Kellerman, R. (1989) Structuration theory and attempts at integration in human geography, The Professional Geographer, 39(9), pp. 267-274.
45.
King, A. (1999) Against structure: a critique of morphogenic social theory, The Sociological Review, 47(2), pp. 199-227.
46.
Marcuse, P. (2000) No caos, sino muros: el postmodernismo y la ciudad compartimentada, in: A. Ramos (Ed.) Lo Urbano, pp. 45-78. Barcelona: Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya.
47.
McGovern, S. (2003) Ideology, consciousness, and inner city redevelopment: the case of Stephen Goldsmith's Indianapolis, Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(1), pp. 1-25.
48.
Moos, A.I. and Dear, M. (1986) Structuration theory in urban analysis: 1. Theoretical exegesis, Environment and Planning A, 18, pp. 231-252.
49.
Mouzelis, N. (1989) Restructuring structuration theory, The Sociological Review, 37, pp. 613-635.
50.
Nef, J. ( 2003) The Chilean model: fact and fiction, Latin American Research Perspectives, 30(5), pp. 16-40.
51.
Ortiz, J., and Morales, S. (2002) Dimensiones latentes de la diferenciacion del espacio social en una metropolis latinoamericana: el caso del Gran Santiago, Eure, 28(85), pp. 111-130.
52.
Ostrom, E. (1986) An agenda for the study of institutions, Public Choice, 48, pp. 3-24.
53.
Outtes, J. (2003) Disciplining society through the city: the genesis of city planning in Brazil and Argentina, Bulletin of Latin American Research, 22(2), pp. 137-164.
54.
Parker, S.F. (2001a) Community, social identity and the structuration of power in contemporary European city. Part one: toward a theory of urban structuration, City, 5, pp. 189-202.
55.
Parker, S.F. (2001b) Community, social identity and the structuration of power in contemporary European city. Part two: power and identity in the urban community: a comparative analysis, City, 5, pp. 281-308.
56.
Philo, C. and Parr, H. (2000) Institutional geographies: introductory remarks , Geoforum, 31, pp. 513-521.
57.
Phipps, A. (2000) A structurationist interpretation of community activism during school closures, Environment and Planning A, 32, pp. 1807-1823.
58.
Roberts, S.M. and Schein, R.H. (1993) The entrepreneurial city: fabricating urban development in Syracuse, New York, The Professional Geographer, 45(1), pp. 21-33.
59.
Rodriguez, A. and Winchester, L. (2001) Santiago de Chile: metropolizacion, globalización, desigualdad, Eure, 27(80), pp. 121-139.
60.
Sabatini, F. (1997) Conflictos ambientales y desarrollo sustentable de las regiones urbanas, Eure, 22(68), pp. 77-91.
61.
Short, J.R., Benton, L.M., Luce, W.B. and Walton, J. (1993) Reconstructing the image of an industrial city , Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 83(2), pp. 207-224.
62.
Silva, E. (1995) Intellectuals, technocrats, and politics in Chile: from global projects to the 'management of things', in: B. Galjart and P. Silva (Eds) Designers and Development: Intellectuals in the Third World, pp. 190-212. Leiden: Leiden University.
63.
Silva, E. (1996) The State and Capital in Chile: Business Elites, Technocrats, and Market Economics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
64.
Silva, P. (1998) Neoliberalism, democratization, and the rise of technocrats, in: M. Vellinga (Ed.) The Changing Role of the State in Latin America, pp. 75-92. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
65.
Soja, E. (2000) Postmetropolis: Critical Studies of Cities and Regions. Oxford: Blackwell.
66.
Steiner, R. (1976) The Philosophy of Liberty. Basel: Anthroposophical Press.
67.
Stone, C.N. (1989) Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence, KA: University Press of Kansas .
68.
Storper, M. (1985) The spatial and temporal constitution of social action: a critical reading of Giddens, Environment and PlanningC, 3, pp. 407-424.
69.
Taylor, L. (1998) Citizenship, Participation and Democracy: Changing Dynamics in Chile and Argentina. London: Macmillan.
70.
Thompson, J. (1989) The structuration theory, in: D. Held and J. Thompson (Eds) Social Theory of Modern Society: Anthony Giddens and His Critics , pp. 56-76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71.
Thrift, N. (1985) On the determination of social action in space and time, Environment and Planning D, 1, pp. 23-57.
72.
Valdes, J.G. (1995) Pinochet's Economist. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
73.
Ward, K.G. (1997) Coalition in urban regeneration: a regime approach , Environment and Planning A, 29, pp. 1493-1506.
74.
Ward, P. (1996) Contemporary issues in the government and administration of Latin America, in: A. Gilbert (Ed.) The Mega-city in Latin America, pp. 53-72. New York: United Nations University Press.
75.
Waterstone, M. (1995) Social theory, structuration and institutional analysis: grounding theory and theorizing practice. Paper presented to Department of Geography, University of Oregon, November.
76.
Waterstone, M. (1996) A conceptual framework for institutional analysis of transboundary water resource management: theoretical perspectives, in: J. Ganoulis, L. Duckstein, P. Literathy and I. Bogardi (Eds) Transboundary Water Resource Management: Institutional and Engineering Approaches, pp. 9-18. New York : Springer.
77.
Zunino, H. (2004) Analytical and conceptual framework to study structures of governance and multi-level power relations in urban initiatives. PhD thesis , University of Arizona, Tucson .
78.
Zunino, H. (2005) Social theory at work: analyzing multi-level power relations in the redevelopment of Concepcion's riverfront, Cidades, 2(4), pp. 315-342.
