Recent debates over how to characterise the governance of urban regeneration are developed in this paper using a detailed case study of Attwood Green in Birmingham, UK. Specifically, the relationship between actors within governance networks and the state is critically reappraised. The case study suggests that actors tend to display highly reflexive understandings of government as multifaceted and multidimensional, simultaneously trying to establish distance and proximity from different aspects of state power. The relationship between those agents regenerating Attwood Green and local and central government is highly strategic, manipulating transfers of financial, political and legal power through new organisational configurations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, D. and Hutchinson, N. (2000) The Urban Task Force report: reviewing land ownership constraints to brownfield redevelopment, Regional Studies , 34, pp. 777-782.
2.
Adger, W., Brown, K., Fairbrass, J. ET AL. (2002) Governance for sustainability: towards a 'thick' analysis of environmental decision-making, Environment and Planning A, 35, pp. 1095-1110.
3.
Anon (1996) Protestors hit the roof over estate, Birmingham Post, 3 December.
4.
Atkinson, R. (2002) Rebuilding community: policy and practice in urban regeneration, UrbanStudies, 39, pp. 2555-2556.
5.
Audit Commission (1986) Managing the Crisis in Council Housing. London: HMSO.
6.
Ball, M., Le Ny, L. and Maginn, P. (2003) Synergy in urban regeneration partnerships: property agents' perspectives, UrbanStudies, 40, pp. 2239-2253.
7.
Birmingham City Council (1999) Central area estates development framework: supplementary planning guidance . Birmingham: Birmingham City Council .
8.
Brenner, M., Brown, J. and Canter, D. (1985) The Research Interview: Uses and Approaches. London: Academic Press.
9.
Brownill, S. (2003) Book review of Partnerships and Regimes: The Politics of Urban Regeneration in the UK, by J. S. Davies, 2001, Urban Studies, 40, pp. 646-647.
10.
Cameron, S. (2003) Gentrification, housing redifferentiation and urban regeneration: 'going for growth' in Newcastle upon Tyne, UrbanStudies, 40, pp. 2367-2382.
11.
Cassel, C. and Symon, G. (1994) Qualitative Methods in Organisational Research . London: Sage.
12.
Cochrane, A. (1993) Whatever Happened to Local Government. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
13.
Collins, T. (1998) Town hall slums protest: estate tenants hang banner , Birmingham Evening Mail, 9 May.
14.
Corry, D., Hatter, W. , Parker, 1. ET AL. (Eds) ( 2004) Joining up Local Democracy: Governance Systems for New Localism. London: New Local Government Network.
15.
Couch, C. and Denneman, A. (2000) Urban regeneration and sustainable development in Britain, Cities, 17, pp. 137-147.
16.
Davies, J. (2001) Partnerships and Regimes: The Politics of Urban Regeneration in the UK. Aldershot: Ashgate.
17.
Davies, J. (2002) The governance of urban regeneration: a critique of the 'governing without government' thesis, Public Administration , 80, pp. 301-322.
18.
Davies, J. (2003) Partnerships versus regimes: why regime theory cannot explain urban coalitions in the UK, Journal of Urban Affairs, 25, pp. 253-269.
19.
Davies, J. (2004) Conjuncture or disjuncture? An institutional analysis of local regeneration partnerships in the UK, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28, pp. 570-585.
20.
Detr (Department Of Transport, Local Government And The Regions) (1999) Urban Task Force Prospectus: Our Towns And Cities: The Future-Delivering an Urban Renaissance. London: HMSO.
21.
Detr (2000) Our Towns and Cities: The Future. London: HMSO.
22.
Elkin, S. (1987) City and Regime in the American Republic. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
23.
Evans, C. (1999) Derelict Land and Brownland Regeneration. Oxford: Chandos.
24.
Evans, J. (2003) Biodiversity conservation and brown field sites: a scalar political ecology. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Birmingham
25.
Evans, J. (2006) Lost in translation? Exploring the interface between local environmental research and policy-making, Environment and Planning A (forthcoming).
26.
Fearnley, R. (2000) Regenerating the inner city: lessons from the UK's City Challenge experience, Social Policy and Administration , 34, pp. 567-583.
27.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001) Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Giddens, A. (1988) The Third Way. Cambridge: Polity Press.
29.
Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldinede Gruyter.
30.
Hall, S. (2000) The way forward for regeneration ? Lessons from the Single Regeneration Budget Challenge Fund, Local Government Studies, 26, pp. 1-14.
31.
Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in a Fragmented Society. London: Macmillan.
32.
Imrie, R. and Raco, M. (1999) How new is the new local governance? Lessons from the United Kingdom, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 24, pp. 45-63.
33.
Innes, J. (1994) Planning through Consensus-building: A New View of the Consensus Planning Ideal. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
34.
Jessop, B. (1994) Post-Fordism and the state, in: A. Amin and M. Malden (Eds) Post-Fordism: A Reader, pp. 251-279. Oxford : Blackwell.
35.
Jessop, B. (2001) Institutional re(turns) and the strategic-relational approach, Environment and Planning A, 33, pp. 1213-1235.
36.
Jones, P. (2004a) Historical continuity and post-1945 urban redevelopment: the example of Lee Bank, Birmingham, UK, Planning Perspectives , 19, pp. 365-389.
37.
Jones, P. (2004b) Paying the price for high hopes: UK public sector high-rise and the Housing Subsidies Act, 1956, Planning History , 26, pp. 12-16.
38.
Krueger, R. and Agyeman, J. (2005) Sustainability schizophrenia or 'actually existing sustain-abilities' ? Toward a broader understanding of the politics and promise of local sustainability in the US, Geoforum, 36, pp. 410-417.
39.
Lambooy, J. and Moulaert, F. (1996) The economic organisation of cities: an institutional perspective, International Journal of Urban and Regional Studies , 20, pp. 217-237.
40.
Lauria, M. (Ed.) (1997) Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory: Regulating Urban Politics in a Global Economy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
Loveless, J. (1987) Towards an Urban Renaissance. London: ASI Research Ltd.
42.
Lowndes, V. (2001) Rescuing Aunt Sally: taking institutional theory seriously in urban politics, Urban Studies, 38, pp. 1953-1971.
43.
de Magalhaes, C., Healey, P. and Madanipour, A. (2002) Assessing institutional capacity for city centre regeneration: Newcastle's Grainger Town, in: G. Cars, P. Healey, A. Madanipour and C. De Magalhaes (Eds) Urban Governance, Institutional Capacity and Social Milieux , pp. 45-64. Aldershot : Ashgate.
44.
Malbert, B. (1998) Participatory approaches to sustainable urban development: reflexions on practice in Seattle, Vancouver and Waitakere, Planning Practice and Research, 13, pp. 183-189.
45.
Malpass, P. (1994) Policy making and local governance: how Bristol failed to secure City Challenge funding (twice), Policy and Politics, 22, pp. 301-312.
46.
Malpass, P. and Murie, A. (1999) Housing Policy and Practice. London: Macmillan.
47.
Manning, P. and Cullum Swann, B. (1994) Narrative, content and semiotic analysis, in: N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (Eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 463-477. London: Sage.
48.
Manzoni, H. (1945) Town and Country Planning Act, 1944: acquisition of properties, redevelopment areas. Minutes of the Public Works Committee, Birmingham City Council, 25 October.
49.
Massey, D. and Allen, J. (Eds) (1988) Uneven Redevelopment: Cities and Regions in Transition. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
50.
Newman, J. (2001) Modernising Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society. London: Sage.
51.
Odpm (Office Of The Deputy Prime Minister) ( 2001) Planning: Delivering Fundamental Change. London: HMSO.
52.
Odpm (2003) Sustainable Communities: Building for the Future. London: HMSO.
Owens, S. and Cowell, R. (2002) Land and Limits: Interpreting Sustainable Development within the Planning System. London: Routledge.
55.
Pierre, J. (2000) Introduction: understanding governance, in: J. Pierre (Ed.) Debating Governance , pp. 1-12. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56.
Pinto, R. (1991) Central/local interaction in renovating run-down estates: the view of housing authorities on the Estate Action initiative, Local Government Studies, 17, pp. 45-62.
57.
Pollitt, C., Birchall, J. and Putman, K. (1999) Letting managers decide: decentralism and opting-out , in: G. Stoker (Ed.) The New Management of British Local Governance, pp. 40-61. Basingstoke : Palgrave.
58.
Rhodes, R. (1996) The new governance: governing without governance , Political Studies, 44, pp. 652-667.
59.
Rhodes, R. (1997) Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
60.
Rhodes, R. (1999) Foreword: governance and networks, in: G. Stoker (Ed.) The New Management of British Local Governance, pp. xiixxvi. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
61.
Rhodes, R. (2000a) Foreword, in: G. Stoker (Ed.) The New Politics of British Local Governance , pp. xi-xv. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
62.
Rhodes, R. (2000b) Governance and public administration, in: J. Pierre (Ed.) Debating Governance , pp. 54-90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63.
Rydin, Y., Holman, N., Hands, V. and Sommer, F. (2003) Incorporating sustainable development concerns into an urban regeneration project: how politics can defeat procedures, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 46, pp. 545-561.
64.
Smith, M. and Beazley, M. (2000) Progressive regimes, partnerships and the involvement of local communities: a framework for evaluation, Public Administration , 78, pp. 855-878.
65.
Stoker, G. (Ed.) (1999a) The New Management of British Local Governance. Basingstoke : Macmillan.
66.
Stoker, G. (1999b) Introduction: the unintended costs and benefits of new management reform for British local government, in: G. Stoker (Ed.) The New Management of British Local Governance, pp. 1-21. Basingstoke: Macmillan .
67.
Stoker, G. (Ed.) (2000) The New Politics of British Local Governance. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
68.
Stone, C. (1989) Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas .
69.
Sutcliffe, A. and Smith, R. (1974) History of Birmingham Vol. III: Birmingham, 1939-1970 . London: Oxford University Press for Birmingham City Council.
70.
Swyngedouw, E., Moulaert, F. and Rodriguez, A. (2002) Neoliberal urbanisation in Europe: large-scale urban development projects and the new urban policy, Antipode , 34, pp. 542-577.
71.
Taylor, B. (1998) So whose side are the trade unions on?, Sunday Mercury, 19 April.
72.
Thomas, K. (1996) Voluntary organizations and the reconfiguration of local governance: the case of training and enterprise councils, Critical Social Policy, 16, pp. 89-110.
73.
Thornley, A. (Ed.) (1991) Urban Planning under Thatcherism: The Challenge of the Market. London: Routledge.
74.
Thurstain-Goodwin, M. (2001) The sustainable city: urban regeneration and ustainability , Environment and Planning B, 28, pp. 629-630.
75.
Walker, R. and Jeanes, E. (2001) Innovation in a regulated service: the case of the English housing associations, Public Management Review , 4, pp. 525-550.
76.
Ward, K. (1996) Rereading urban regime theory: a sympathetic critique , Geoforum, 27, pp. 427-438.
77.
Ward, S. (2004) Planning and Urban Change. London: Sage.
78.
Warrington, M. (1995) Welfare pluralism or shadow state? The provision of social housing in the 1990s, Environment and Planning A , 27, pp. 1341-1360.
79.
Weaver, J. (1996) Residents voice anger over 'slum quarter', Birmingham Post, 10 June.
80.
Wolch, J. (1990) The Shadow State: Government and the Voluntary Sector in Transition. New York: Foundation Centre.
81.
Yin, R. ( 1989) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: Sage.
