This paper is a review of the aims and practice of active citizenship in England. It sets out the key concepts and gives an account of the developing policy agenda in crime, regeneration and housing, education, health and local government. It reviews the current state of scientific knowledge in this area, in particular summarising research commissioned by the Home Office Civil Renewal Research Programme, 2004-05. Whilst the research findings show the positive contribution of government initiatives in this area, a key theme that emerges is that the policy context and the causal relationships are often more complex than advocates sometimes claim.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andersson, E., Warburton, D. and Wilson, R. (2005) The true costs of public participation. Research Report, Home Office Civil Renewal Research Programme.
2.
Bang, H. (Ed.) (2003) Governance as Social and Political Institution. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
3.
Barnes, M. (1999) Researching public participation, Local Government Studies, 25(4), pp. 60-76.
4.
Bastow, S., Beck, H., Dunleavy, P. and Richardson, L. (2005) The role of individual incentives within strategies promoting civil renewal. Research Report, Home Office Civil Renewal Research Programme.
5.
Blunkett, D. (2003) Active citizens, strong communities: progressing civil renewal. Scarman Trust Forum Lecture, 11 December.
6.
Bottoms, A. and Wilson, A. (2006) Government citizens partnership and community safety . Research Report, Home Office Civil Renewal Research Programme (forthcoming).
7.
Burton, P. (2003) Community involvement in neighourhood regeneration: stairway to heaven or road to nowhere? Paper 13, ESRC Centre for Neighbourhood Research.
8.
Burton, P., Goodlad, R. and Croft, J. (2004) How would we know what works? Context and complexity in the evaluation of community involvement. Paper 18, ESRC Centre for Neighbourhood Research.
9.
Cabinet Office (2005) The Magenta Book, Guidance Notes on Policy Evaluation. London: Cabinet Office (http://www.policyhub.gov.uk/magenta_book/).
10.
Clapham, D., Kintrea, K. and Kay, H. (2000) User participation in community housing: is small really beautiful?, in: G. Stoker (Ed.) The New Politics of British Local Governance, pp. 215-233. London : Macmillan.
11.
Crawford, A. (1998) Community safety and the quest for security: holding back the dynamics of social exclusion, Policy Studies, 19(3/4), pp. 237-253.
12.
Department Of Health (2004) Choosing Health: Making Healthy Choices Easier. London : HMSO.
13.
Detr (Department For Environment, Transport And The Regions) (1998) Modern local government: in touch with the people. White Paper. London: HMSO.
14.
Detr (2000) Preparing community strategies: government guidance to local authorities. London: HMSO.
15.
Dibben, P. and Bartlett, D. (2001) Local government and service users: empowerment through user-led innovation?, Local Government Studies, 27(3), pp. 43-58.
16.
Dobson, A. (2003) Citizenship and the Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
Donahue, J. and Nye, J. (Eds) (2001) Governance Amid Bigger, Better Markets. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
18.
Donahue, J. and Nye, J. (Eds) (2002) Market-based Governance: Supply Side, Demand Side, Upside and Downside. Washington, DC : Brookings Institution Press.
19.
Durlauf, S. (2002) On the empirics of social capital, The Economic Journal, 112(483), pp. 459-479.
20.
Dyson, A., Millward, A. and Todd, L. (2002) A study of the 'extended' schools demonstration projects. Research Report 381, Department for Education and Skills.
21.
Dzur, A. (2003) Civic implications of restorative justice theory: citizen participation and criminal justice policy, Policy Sciences, 36(3/4), pp. 279-342.
22.
Forrest, R. and Kearns, A. (2001) Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood , Urban Studies, 38(2), pp. 2125-2143.
23.
Gaffney, M. (2005) Civic pioneers: local people, local government, working together to make life better. Civil Renewal Unit Report, Home Office.
24.
Halpern, D. (2005) Social Capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Hawe, P. and Shiell, A. (2000) Social capital and health promotion: a review, Social Science and Medicine, 51(6), pp. 871-885.
26.
John, P. (2005) The contribution of volunteering, trust and networks to educational performance, Policy Studies Journal, 33(4), pp. 635-656.
27.
John, P. and Stoker, G. (2005) Design experiments: a programme for policy learning and evaluation. Unpublished paper (http://www.ipeg.org.uk/docs/designexperimentspaper151005.pdf).
28.
Jones, S. and Roberts, C. (2005) Examining the involvement in community involvement: a case study of referral order volunteers in one youth offending team. Research Report, Home Office Civil Renewal Research Programme.
29.
Kearns, A. (2004) Social capital, regeneration and urban policy. Paper 15, ESRC Centre for Neighbourhood Research.
30.
Knack, S. and Keefer, P.( 1997) Does social capital have an economic pay-off? A cross country investigation, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, pp. 1251-1288.
31.
Lowndes, V. and Chapman, R. (2005) Faith, hope and clarity: developing a model of faith group involvement in civil renewal Research Report, Home Office Civil Renewal Research Programme.
32.
Lowndes, V., Pratchett, L. and Stoker, G. (2001) Trends in public participation: part 1: local government perspectives, Public Administration, 79(1), pp. 205-222.
33.
Macinko, J. and Starfield, B. (2001) The utility of social capital in research on health determinants, The Millbank Quarterly, 79(3), pp. 387-428.
34.
Macmillan, R. with Marshall, F. (2006) Promoting community involvement through regeneration: exploring the configurational comparative approach. Research Report, Home Office Civil Renewal Research Programme (forthcoming).
35.
Newburn, T. and Jones, T. (2002) Consultation by Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnerships . Paper 148, Police Research Series, Home Office.
36.
Newman, J. (2001) Modernising Governance, New Labour, Policy and Society. London: Sage Publications .
37.
Niemi, R. and Junn, J. (1998) Civic Education: What Makes Students Learn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
38.
Odpm (Office Of The Deputy Prime Minister) ( 2002) Public participation in local government: a survey of local authorities, local and regional government. Research Programme. London: HMSO.
39.
Odpm (2005a) New localism-citizen engagement, neighbourhoods and public services: evidence from local government . Local and Regional Government Research Unit.
40.
Odpm (2005b) Civic education and local government: a literature review. ODPM, London.
41.
Ons (Office For National Statistics) (2001 ) Social capital: a review of the literature. ONS, London.
42.
Pattie, C., Seyd, P. and Whiteley, P. (2004) Citizenship in Britain. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
43.
Pierre, J. and Peters, G. (2000) Governance, Politics and the State. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
44.
Prior, D., Farrow, K., Spalek, B. and Barnes, M. (2005) Anti-social behaviour and civil renewal: a study of the Hodge Hill district of Birmingham. Research Report, Home Office Civil Renewal Research Programme.
45.
Productivity Commission (2003) Social capital: reviewing the concept and its policy implications. Research Paper, Auslnfo, Canberra.
46.
Putnam, R. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster .
47.
Ranson, P. (2002) The participation of volunteer citizens in school governance. Research Report L215252043, ESRC Democracy and Participation Programme.
48.
Rhodes, R. (1997) Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
49.
Rogers, B. and Robinson, E. (2004) The benefits of community engagement: a review of the evidence. Active Citizenship Centre, Home Office .
50.
Rowe, R. and Shepherd, M. (2002) Public participation in the new NHS: no closer to citizen control?, Social Policy and Administration, 36(3), pp. 275-290.
51.
Salter, B. (2003) Patients and doctors: reformulating the UK health policy community?, Social Science and Medicine, 57(5), pp. 927-936.
52.
Stolle, D. and Hooghe, M. (2005) Review article: inaccurate, exceptional, one-sided or irrelevant? The debate about the alleged decline of social capital and civic engagement in Western societies, British Journal of Political Science, 35(1), pp. 149-167.
53.
Stoker, G. (1998) Governance as theory: five propositions, International Social Science Journal, 50, pp. 17-28.
54.
Stoker, G. (2004) Transforming Local Governance: From Thatcherism to New Labour. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
55.
Sullivan, J.L. and Transue, J.E. (1999) The psychological underpinnings of democracy: a selective review of research on political tolerance, interpersonal trust, and social capital, Annual Review ofPsychology, 50, pp. 625-650.
56.
Whiteley, P. (2000) Economic growth and social capital, Political Studies, 48(3), pp. 443-466.
57.
Wilkin, A., Kinder, K., White, R. ET AL. (2003) Towards the development of extended schools . Research Report No. 408, Department for Education and Skills.
