Despite the wide array of academic research, the impacts of compact urban development are not very well understood. What is lacking are, first, the insights into how a region or country would have appeared under policy regimes other than those realised and, secondly, a broad evaluation of relevant land use, transport, accessibility and related societal and ecological impacts. Here, we report on an initial attempt to establish a methodology and evaluation framework for analysing the effectiveness of Dutch compact urbanisation policies implemented between 1970 and 2000. Our conclusion is that, without compact urban development policies, urban sprawl in the Netherlands is likely to have been greater, car use would have been higher at the cost of alternative modes, emission and noise levels in residential and natural environments, and the fragmentation of wildlife habitats would have been higher.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, W.P., Kanaroglou, P.S. and Miller, E.J. (1996) Urban form, energy and the environment: a review of issues, evidence and policy, UrbanStudies, 33(1), pp. 7-35.
2.
Badoe, D.A. and Miller, E.J. (2000) Transportation-land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling, Transportation Research Part D, 5, pp. 235-263.
3.
Bagley, M.N. and Mokhtarian, P.L. (2002) The impact of residential neighborhood type on travel behavior: a structural equations modeling approach , Annals of Regional Science, 36(2), pp. 279-297.
4.
Banister, D. (1997) Reducing the need to travel, Environment and Planning B, 24, pp. 437-449.
5.
Banister, D., Watson, S. and Wood, C. (1997) Sustainable cities: transport, energy, and urban form, Environment and Planning B, 24(1), pp. 125-143.
6.
Breheny, M. (1995) The compact city and transport energy consumption , Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS , 20, pp. 81-101.
7.
Breheny, M. (1997) Urban compaction: feasible and acceptable?, Cities, 14(4), pp. 209-217.
8.
Burton, E. (2000) The compact city: just or just compact? A preliminary analysis, Urban Studies, 37(11), 1969-2006.
9.
Cervero, R. (2004) The built environment and travel: evidence from the United States, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 3(2), pp. 119-137.
10.
Dieleman, F.M., Dijst, M. and Burghouwt, G. (2002) Urban form and travel behaviour: micro-level household attributes and residential context, UrbanStudies, 39(3), pp. 507-527.
11.
Dieleman, F.M., Dijst, M.J. and Spit, T. (1999) Planning the compact city: the Randstad Holland experience, European Planning Studies, 7(5), pp. 605-621.
12.
Ecorys-Nei (2004) KKBA verstedelijkingsalternatieven Randstad [Tentative cost-benefit analysis of urbanisation scenarios for the Randstad]. ECORYS Research, Rotterdam .
13.
Ecotec (1993) Reducing transport emissions through planning. Department of the Environment/Department of Transport/Ecotec Research & Consulting Ltd/Transportation Planning Associates, London.
14.
Engelen, G., White, R. and de Nus, T. (2003) Environment Explorer: spatial support system for the integrated assessment of socio-economic and environmental policies in the Netherlands, Integrated Asessment, 4(2), pp. 97-105.
15.
Farjon, J.M.J., Hazendonk, N.F.C. and Hoeffnagel, W.J.C. (1997) Verkenning natuur en verstedelijking 1995-2020 [Exploring natural areas and urbanisation]. IKC Natuurbeheer, Wageningen.
16.
Geurs, K.T. and van Wee, B. (2004) Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions, Journal of Transport Geography, 12, pp. 127-140.
17.
Gunn, H. and Hoorn, T. Vander (1998) The predictive power of operational demand models: a case study. Paper presented to the 8th World Conference on Transportation Research, Antwerp.
18.
Hajer, M. and Zonneveld, W. (2000) Spatial planning in the network society: rethinking the principles of planning in the Netherlands, European Planning Studies, 8(3), pp. 337-355.
19.
Handy, S. (1996) Methodologies for exploring the link between urban form and travel behaviour, Transportation Research-D, 1(2), pp. 151-165.
20.
Headicar, P. (2004) The contribution of land use planning to reducing traffic growth: the English experience, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 3(2), pp. 137-154.
21.
Heijden, K. Van Der (1996) Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
22.
Hilbers, H., Wilmink, I. and Droppert-Zilver, M.N. (1999) Evaluatie mobiliteitsgedrag bewoners VINEX-locaties [Evaluation of mobility effects of VINEX locations. Final report]. Delft: TNO Inro.
23.
Jenks, M., Burton, E. and Williams, K. (1996) The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form?London: E&FN Spon.
24.
Kitamura, R., Mokhtarian, P.L. and Laidet, L. (1997) A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighbourhoods in the San Fransisco Bay Area, Transportation , 24, pp. 125-159.
25.
Kockelman, K.M. (1997) Travel behavior as function of accessibility, land use mixing, and land use balance: evidence from San Francisco Bay Area, Transportation Research Record, 1607, pp. 116-125.
26.
Korver, W., Vandfrschurfn, M.J.W.A. (1995) Monitoring van de mobiliteit: een analyse van invloedsfactoren achter de recente mobiliteitsontwikkelingen in het personenvervoer [Monitoring mobility: analysis of variables influencing passenger mobility developments] . Delft: TNO Inro.
27.
Kramer, H. and Knol, W.C. (2003) Historisch Grondgebruik in Nederland: grondgebruik rond 1970 in 500 meter grids [Land use in the Netherlands: land use in 1970 in 500 metre grid cells]. Wageningen: Alterra.
28.
Lautso, K., Spiekerman, K., Wegener, M. ET AL. (2003) PROPOLIS. Planning and Research of Policies for Land Use and Transport for Increasing Urban Sustainability. Final Report. Helsinki: LT Consultants.
29.
Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.L., Randers, J. and Behrens, W.W. (1972) The Limits to Growth. New York : Universe Books.
30.
Meurs, H. and Haaijer, R. (2001) Spatial structure and mobility, Transportation Research Part D Transport andEnvironment, 6(6), pp. 429-446.
31.
Meurs, H. and van Wee, B. (2004) Land use and mobility: a synthesis of findings and policy implications, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 3(2), pp. 219-233.
32.
Ministry Of Economic Affairs (1999) Nota Ruimtelijk Economisch Beleid [Report on spatial economic policy] . The Hague.
33.
Ministry Of Housing And Physical Planning ( 1966) Second Report on Physical Planning in the Netherlands . The Hague.
34.
Ministry Of Housing, Physical Planning And The Environment (1977) Derde nota over de ruimtelijke ordening. Deel 2: Verstedelijkingsnota. [Third Report on Physical Planning. Part 2: Urbanisation Report]. The Hague.
35.
Ministry Of Housing, Physical Planning And The Environment (1991) Fourth Report on Physical Planning in the Netherlands (Extra). Summary. The Hague.
36.
Ministry Of Housing, Spatial Planning And The Environment (2003) Beter Thuis In Wonen. Kernpublicatie WoningBehoefte Onderzoek 2002 [Housing preference survey report 2002]. The Hague.
37.
Ministry Of Housing, Spatial Planning And The Environment (2004) Making Space, Sharing Space. Draft Fifth National Policy Document on Spatial Planning. The Hague (summary available at http://www.vrom.nl/international/).
38.
Ministry Of Transport, Public Works And Water Management (1990) Second Transport Structure Plan. The Hague.
39.
Neass, P. (2004) Urban structures and travel behavior: experiences from empirical research in Norway and Denmark, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 3(2), pp. 155-178.
40.
Newman, P. and Kenworthy, J. (1989) Cities and Automobile Dependence: A Sourcebook . Victoria: Gower, Aldershot and Brookfield.
41.
Newman, P. and Kenworthy, J.( 1999) Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence . Washington, DC: Island Press .
42.
Nijs, T.C.M. De, de Niet, R. and Crommen-Tuijn, L. (2004) Constructing land-use maps of the Netherlands in 2030, Journal of Environmental Management , 72, pp. 35-42.
43.
Ploeger, J. and Waard, J. Van Der (1997 ) Waar komt de groei vandaan? De mobiliteit in kaart gebracht. [Where does the growth come from? Analysing passenger mobility growth], in: Infrastructurele ontwikkelingen, pp. 9-28Rotterdam : Transport Research Centre.
44.
Ryan, S. and McNally, M.G. (1995) Accessibility of neotraditional neighborhoods: a review of design concepts, policies, and recent literature, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 29 (2), pp. 87-105.
45.
Schwanen, T. (2003) Spatial variations in travel behaviour and time use. The role of urban form and sociodemographic factors in individuals' travel and activity pattern in the Netherlands. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
46.
Shift An, Y., Kaplan, S. and Hakkert, S. (2003) Scenario building as a tool for planning a sustainable transportation system, Transportation Research Part D: Transport andEnvironment, 8(5), pp. 323-342.
Snellen, D. (2001) Urban form and activity-travel patterns: an activity-based approach to travel in a spatial context. Eindhoven: Eindhoven University.
49.
Spaans, M. and Trip, J.J. (2003) Vinexconventanten: een evaluatie [Vinex agreements: an evaluation], Stedebouw en Ruimtelijke Ordening, (02), pp. 48-50.
50.
Stead, D. and Marshall, S. (2001) The relationship between urban form and travel patterns: an international review and evaluation, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 1(2), pp. 113-141.
51.
van Straten, A., Strootman, B.G. and Berkhof, M.G. (1996) Het groene hart in retrospectief: evaluatie Groene Hartbeleid 1950-1995 [The Green Heart in retrospective: policy evaluation . Report No. RPD 45B506, Ministry of Housing, Physical Planning and the Environment, The Hague.
52.
Verroen, E.J., Hilbers, H.D. and Smits, C.A. (1995) Modeltoets Randstadvisie: de resultaten [Model evaluation of the Randstad scenarios: the results]. Delft : TNO.
53.
Vrom (2004) The National Spatial Strategy. Room for development. Summary. The Hague: Ministry of Housing, Physical Planning and the Environment.
54.
VROM Council (1999) Mobiliteit met beleid [Mobility with policy]. Advice 017. The Hague : Council for Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment .
55.
Waals, J. F. M. Van Der (2000) The compact city and the environment: a review , Journal of Economic and Social Geography, 91(2), pp. 111-121.
56.
van Wee, B. (2002) Land use and transport:research and policy challenges , Journal of Transport Geography, 10, pp. 259-271.
57.
van Wee, B. and Hoorn, T. Van Der (2001) Land-use impacts on passenger transport: a comparison of Dutch scenario studies, in: E. Feitelson and E. T. Veshoef (Eds) Transport and Environment: In Search of Sustainable Solutions, pp. 231-254. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
58.
van Wee, B. and Maat, K. (2004) Land-use and transport: a review and discussion of Dutch Research, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 3(2), pp. 199-218.
59.
van Wee, B., Holwerda, H. and van Baren, R. (2002) Preferences for modes, residential location and travel behaviour: the relevance for land-use impacts on mobility , European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research , 2 (3/4), 305-316.
60.
Wegener, M. and Furst, F. (1999) Land-use transport interaction: state of the art. Deliver-able D2a of the project TRANSLAND (Integration of Transport and Land use Planning). Berichte aus den Insititut fur Raumplanung, Insititut fur Raumplanung, Universitat Dortmund.46
61.
White, R., Engelen, G. and Uljee, J. (1997) The use of constrained cellular automata for high-resolution modelling of urban land-use dynamics, Environment and Planning B, 24, pp. 323-343.
62.
Williams, K., Burton, E. and Jenks, M. (2000) Achieving Sustainable Urban Form. London: E&FN Spon.
63.
WRR (1998) Ruimtelijke ontwikkelingspolitiek [Spatial development politics]. Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid, The Hague.
