Displacement has been at the centre of heated analytical and political debates over gentrification and urban change for almost 40 years. A new generation of quantitative research has provided new evidence of the limited (and sometimes counter-intuitive) extent of displacement, supporting broader theoretical and political arguments favouring mixed-income redevelopment and other forms of gentrification. This paper offers a critical challenge to this interpretation, drawing on evidence from a mixed-methods study of gentrification and displacement in New York City. Quantitative analysis of the New York City Housing and Vacancy Survey indicates that displacement is a limited yet crucial indicator of the deepening class polarisation of urban housing markets; moreover, the main buffers against gentrification-induced displacement of the poor (public housing and rent regulation) are precisely those kinds of market interventions that are being challenged by advocates of gentrification and dismantled by policy-makers. Qualitative analysis based on interviews with community organisers and residents documents the continued political salience of displacement and reveals an increasingly sophisticated and creative array of methods used to resist displacement in a policy climate emphasising selective deregulation and market-oriented social policy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Atkinson, R. (2000) Measuring gentrification and displacement in Greater London, UrbanStudies, 37(1), pp. 149-165.
2.
Atkinson, R. (2002) Does gentrification help or harm urban neighbourhoods? An assessment of the evidence-base in the context of the new urban agenda . Paper 5, Center for Neighborhood Research. June (accessed on-line).
3.
Atkinson, R. (2004) The evidence on the impact of gentrification: new lessons for the urban reniassance?, European Journal of Housing Policy, 4(1), pp 107-131.
4.
ATKiNsoN, R. and Bridge, G. (Eds) (2005) The New Urban Colonialism: New Perspectives on the Gentry in the City. London: Routledge.
5.
Beauregard, R. (1986) The chaos and complexity of gentrification, in: N. Smith and P. Williams (Eds) Gentrification of the City. London: Unwin Hyman.
6.
Beauregard, R. (1989) The spatial transformation of postwar Philadelphia , in: R. Beauregard (Ed.) Atop the Urban Hierarchy, pp. 197-240. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.
7.
Beauregard, R. (1993) Voices of Decline. Oxford: Blackwell.
8.
Berry, B. (1985) Islands of renewal in seas of decay, in: P. Peterson (Ed.) The New Urban Reality. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute .
9.
Byrne, J.P. (2003) Two cheers for gentrification, Howard Law Journal, 46(3), pp. 405-432.
10.
Chen, D. (2003) Bit by bit, government eases its grip on rents in New York, New York Times, 19 November.
11.
Collins, J.A. and Werkstell, B. (2003) The New York City Property Tax: An Overview in Plain English. New York: Drum Major Institute for Public Policy. (http://www.drummajorinstitute.org/plugin/template/dmi/14/1461 ; accessed 24 November).
12.
Crump, J. (2002) Deconcentration by demolition: public housing, poverty, and urban policy, Environment and Planning D, 20, pp 581-596.
13.
Curran, W. (2004) Gentrification and the nature of work: exploring links in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, Environment and Planning A, 36(7), pp. 1141-1330.
14.
Defilippis, J. (2003) Keeping the doors open: HUD-subsidized housing in New York City. Community Service Society Policy Brief (http://www.cssny.org/pubs/policybrief/policybriefl3.pdf ; accessed 21 January).
15.
Duany, A. (2001) Three cheers for gentrification. American Enterprise Magazine, April/May, pp. 36-39.
16.
Fontana, A. and Frey, J.H. (2000) The interview: from structured questions to negotiated itext, in: N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (Eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research . 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications.
17.
Fraser, J., Lepofsky, J., Kick, E. and Williams, J. (2003). The construction of the local and the limits of contemporary community-building in the United States, Urban Affairs Review, 38, pp. 417-445.
18.
Freeman, L. and Braconi, F. (2004) Displacement or succession? Residential mobility in gentrifying neighborhoods, Urban Affairs Review, 40(4), pp. 463-491.
19.
Freeman, L. and Braconi, F. (2002a) Gentrification and displacement, The Urban Prospect, 8(1), pp. 1-4
20.
Freeman, L. and Braconi, F. (2002b). Gentrification and displacement: New York City in the 1990s. Unpublished draft manuscript.
21.
Freeman, L. and Braconi, F. (2004) Gentrification and displacement: New York City in the 1990s, Journal of the American Planning Association , 70(1), pp. 39-52.
22.
Frey, W. (1996) Immigration, domestic migration, and demographic balkanization, Population and Development Review, 22, pp. 741-763.
23.
Frey, W. (2004) The new great migration: Black Americans' return to the South, 1965-2000. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
24.
Grier, G. and Grier, E. (1980) Urban displacement: a reconnaissance, in: S. Bradway Laska and D. Spain (Eds) Back to the City: Issues in Neighborhood Renovation , pp. 252-269. New York: Pergamon Press.
25.
Hackworth, J. and Smith, N. (2001) The changing state of gentrification, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 92(4), pp. 464-477.
26.
Hamnett, C. (2003) Unequal City: London in the Global Arena. London: Routledge.
27.
Hampson, R. (2005) Studies: gentrification a boost for everyone, USA Today, 20 April, pp. 13A- 14A.
28.
Hartman, C. (1984/2002) Right to stay put, reprinted in: Between Eminence and Notoriety. New Brunswick, NJ: CUPR Press.
29.
Hartman, C. and Robinson, D. (2003) Evictions: the hidden housing problem, Housing Policy Debate, 14(4), pp. 461-501.
30.
Hempstead, K. (2001) Immigration and native migration in New York City, 1985-1990. Unpublished working paper (available at www.newschool.edu/icmec/lucepaper2.htm; accessed 14 August 2003 ).
31.
Hempstead, K. (2002) Immigration and Net Migration in New York City 1980-90: A Small-Area Analysis, Policy Studies Journal, 30(1), pp. 92-107.
32.
Imbroscio, D.L. (2004) Can we grant a right to place?, Politics & Society, 32(4), pp. 575-609.
33.
Jackson, N.B. (2002) "If you're thinking of living in Fort Greene. Diversity, Culture and Brown-stones, too", New York Times, 1 September, p. 5.
34.
Kilgannon, C. (2003) In a test program, a landlord gets to play the good guy, New York Times, 28 February.
35.
Lees, L. (2000) A reappraisal of gentrification: towards a 'geography of gentrification', Progress in Human Geography, 24(3), pp. 389-408.
36.
Legates, R. and Hartman, C. (1986) The anatomy of displacement in the US, in: N. Smith and P. Williams (Eds) The Gentrification of the City. pp. 178-200. Boston, MA: Allen and Unwin.
37.
Ley, D. ( 2002) Immigration and domestic migration in gateway cities: Canadian and Australian reflections on an 'American dilemma. Center for Research on Immigration and Integration in the Metropolis , Vancouver.
38.
Marcuse, P. (1986) Abandonment, gentrification, and displacement: the linkages in New York City, in: N. Smith and P. Williams (Eds) Gentrification and the City, pp. 153-177. London: Unwin Hyman.
39.
Marcuse, P. (2005) On the presentation of research about gentrification. Department of Urban Planning, ColumbiaUniversity, New York.
40.
Marshall, C. and Rossman, G. (2000) Designing Qualitative Research. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
41.
Merrifield, A. (2002) Dialectical Urbanism: Social Struggles in the Capitalist City. Monthly Review Press.
42.
Mitchell, D. (2003) The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space. New York: Guilford Press.
43.
Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation (2005 ) When gentrification comes knocking: navigating social dynamics in changing neighborhoods. Conference Binder CB901, Symposium on 20 April. Washington, DC: Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation.
44.
Nelson, K. (1988) Gentrification and Distressed Cities: An Assessment of Trends in Intrametropolitan Migration. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
45.
Newman, S.J. and Owen, M.S. (1982) Residential displacement in the U.S.: 1970-1977 . Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.
46.
Pampel, F.C. (2000) Logistic Regression: A Primer. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences No. 132. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
47.
Piroma, R. (2003) Interview with Chris Bonanos, Real Estate Editor of New York Magazine. New York Voices (available at www.thirteen.org ; accessed 30 July).
48.
Previti, D. and Schill, M. (2003) The State of New York City's Neighborhoods, 2003 . New York City: Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy.
49.
Rent Guidelines Board (2000) Housing NYC: Rents, Markets, and Trends 2000. New York City: New York City Rent Guidelines Board.
50.
Rofe, M. (2004) From 'problem city' to 'promise city': gentrification and the revitalization of Newcastle, Australian Geographical Studies, 42(2), pp. 193-206.
51.
Rose, D. (1984) Rethinking gentrification: beyond the uneven development of Marxist urban theory, Society and Space, 2, pp. 24-74.
52.
Rose, K., Lander, B. and Feng, K. (2004) Increasing housing opportunity in New York City: the case for inclusionary zoning. A Report by Policy-Link and Pratt Institute Center for Community and Environmental Development.
53.
Salvo, J., Banks, L.E. and Mann, E.S. (1990) Reconceptualizing migration as a household phenomenon: outmigration from New York City by race and Hispanic origin, International Migration, 28(3), pp. 311-325.
54.
Schill, M. and Nathan, R. (1983) Revitalizing America's Cities: Neighborhood Reinvestment and Displacement. Albany: SUNY Press .
55.
Seidman, E. (1991) Interviewing as Qualitative Research. New York: Teachers College Press.
56.
Slater, T. (2004) North American gentrification? Revanchist and emancipatory perspectives explored, Environment and Planning A, 36(7), pp. 1191-1213.
57.
Slater, T., Curran, W. and Lees, L. (2004). Guest editorial, Environment and Planning A, 36(7), pp. 1141-1150.
58.
Smith, N. (1996) The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. New York: Routledge .
59.
Smith, N. (2002) New globalism, new urbanism: gentrification as global urban strategy, Antipode, 34(3), pp. 427-450.
60.
Smith, N. and Willikms, P. (Eds) (1986) Gentrification of the City . London: Unwin Hyman.
61.
Stack, C. (1996) Call to Home. New York: Basic Books.
62.
Sumka, H. (1980) Federal antidisplacement policy in a context of urban decline, in: S. Bradway Laska and D. Spain (Eds) Back to the City: Issues in Neighborhood Renovation, pp. 269-287, New York: Pergamon Press.
63.
Supportive Housing Network Of New York (2003 ) Blueprint to end homelessness in New York City. New York: Supportive Housing Network of New York.
64.
Us Bureau Of The Census (1999) Definitions of Rent Regulation Status. Guide prepared by New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development, Office of Housing Analysis and Research (available at: www.census.gov/hhes/www./housing/nychvs/defin99.html; accessed 27 July 2003).
65.
Us Bureau Of The Census (2003) New York City Housing and Vacancy Survey, 1989-2002 (available at: http://www.census.gov/hhes/www./nychvs.html).
66.
Us Department Of Housing And Urban Development ( 1979) Displacement Report. Washington: The Department.
67.
Us Department Of Housing And Urban Development (n.d.) MultiFamily Assistance and Section 8 Contracts Database [as of 9 October 2003] (accessed at: http://www.hud.gov/offices/hsg/mfh/exp/mfhdiscl.cfm ).
68.
Vigdor, J. (2002) Does gentrification harm the poor?, Brookings- Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, pp. 134-173.
69.
Wallin, D., Schill, M. and Daniels, G. (2003) State of New York City's housing and neighborhoods 2003. Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy and Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, New York University (available at: http://www.law.nyu/edu/realestatecenter/).
70.
Wyly, E. and Hammel, D. (1999) Islands of decay in seas of renewal: housing policy and the resurgence of gentrification, Housing Policy Debate , 10(4), pp. 711-781.
