The aim of this paper is to bring some critical reflection to bear on the upsurge of participatory rhetoric in local governance. The research discussed investigates two case studies of deliberative exercises used by local authorities to develop their local transport plans. The analysis avoids the rather simplistic 'check list' evaluative models based upon the Habermasian ideals of communicative rationality and instead develops an approach which attends to the power relations embedded in the process of participation. Significantly, the research, across a range of stakeholder groups, reveals a deeply problematic relationship between citizen involvement and established structures of democratic decision-making. Attention is drawn to the institutional constraints which account for the limited realisation of the participatory agenda in local governance. Conclusions are also developed relating to both the process of participation evaluation and the wider consequences of the expansion of public involvement for the renewal of local democracy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abelson, J., Forest, P.G., Eyles, J. ET AL. (2003) Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes, Social Sciences and Medicine, 57, pp. 239-251.
2.
Atherton, E. and Hunt, J. (2002) Review of consultation techniques for radioactive waste management. Technical Note 365521. NIREX: Harwell.
Barnes, M. (1999a) Building a Deliberative Democracy: An Evaluation of Two Citizens' Juries. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
5.
Barnes, M. (1999b) Researching public participation, Local Government Studies, 25, pp. 60-75.
6.
Barnes, M., Newman, J., Knops, A. and Sullivan, H. (2003) Constituting 'the public' in public participation , Public Administration, 81, pp. 379-399.
7.
Beierle, T.C. (2002) The quality of stakeholder-based decisions, Risk Analysis, 22, pp. 739-751.
8.
Beierle, T.C. and Cayford, J. (2002) Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
9.
Bickerstaff, K. and Walker, G. (2000) Participatory local governance and transport planning , Environment and Planning A, 33, pp. 431-451.
10.
Bickerstaff, K., Tolley, R. and Walker, G. (2002) Transport planning and participation: the rhetoric and realities of public involvement, Journal of Transport Geography, 10, pp. 61-73.
11.
Blair, T. (1998) Prime Minister's speech to the Local Government Conference. 8 February (http://www.pm.gov.uk/output/Page1156asp ).
12.
Buckingham-Hatfield, S. and Percy, S. (Eds) (1999) Constructing Local Environmental Agendas: People, Places and Participation. London: Routledge.
13.
Burns, D. and Taylor, M. (2000) Auditing Community Participation: An Assessment Handbook. Bristol: Joseph Rowntree Foundation and The Policy Press.
14.
Cabinet Office (2002) Risk: improving government's capability to handle risk and uncertainty. London: Cabinet Office Strategy Unit.
15.
Clark,J., Studd, K., Stirling, A. and Burgess, J. (2001) Local outreach: the development of criteria for the evaluation of close and responsive relationships at the local level. Research and Development Report No. W116, Environment Agency, London.
16.
CooKE, B. and Kothari, U. (Eds) (2001) Participation: The New Tyranny?London: Zed Books.
17.
Cooper, L., Coote, A., Davies, A. and Jackson, C. (1995) Voices Off: Tackling the Democratic Deficit in Health. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
18.
Coote, A. and Lenaghan, J. (1997) Citizens Juries: Theory into Practice. London: Institute for Public Policy Research .
19.
Copus, C. (2003) Re-engaging citizens and councils: the importance of the councillor to enhanced citizen involvement, Local Government Studies, 29, pp. 32-51.
20.
Copus, C. (2004) Party Politics and Local Government. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
21.
Davies, A. (2002) Power politics and networks: shaping partnerships for sustainable communities, Area, 34, pp. 190-203.
22.
Defra (Department Of The Environment, Food And Rural Affairs) (2001) Managing radioactive waste safely: proposals for developing a policy for managing solid radioactive waste in the UK. London: The Stationery Office .
23.
Defra (2002) Public Debate on GM Issues,14 June (http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/gm/debate).
24.
Detr (Department Of The Environment Transport And The Regions) (1998a) Modern Local Government: In Touch with the People. Cm4014, London: The Stationery Office.
25.
Detr (1998b) Guidance on Enhancing Public Participation in Local Government. London: The Stationery Office.
26.
Detr (1999) Guidance on Provisional Local Transport Plans. London: The Stationery Office.
27.
Detr (2000a) The Air Quality Strategy for England Scotland Wales and Northern Ireland: Working Together for Clean Air. Cm4548. London: The Stationery Office.
28.
Detr (2000b) Preparing Community Strategies: Draft Guidance to Local Authorities from the Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions. London: The Stationery Office.
29.
Dft (Department For Transport) (2003) Full guidance on Local Transport Plans: second edition ( http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_localtrans/documents/pdf/dft_localtrans_pdf_504005.pdf).
30.
Dft (2004) A study to evaluate the process of introducing Local Transport Plans for English local authorities (http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_localtrans/documents/page/dft_localtrans_022473.hcsp).
31.
Dryzek, J.S. (1996) Political inclusion and the dynamics of democratization , American Political Science Review, 90, pp. 475-487.
32.
Environment Agency (2002) Evaluating methods for public participation. E2-030/TR. Environment Agency, R&D Dissemination Centre, Swindon.
33.
Flyvbjerg, B. (1998) Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
34.
Goffman, E. (1969) The Presentation of the Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin Books.
35.
Hajer, M. and Kesselring, S. (1999) Democracy in the risk society? Learning from the new politics of mobility in Munich, Environmental Politics , 8, pp. 1-23.
36.
Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Plans in Fragmented Societies. Basing-stoke: Macmillan .
37.
Hoggett, P. (1995) Does local government want local democracy, Town and Country Planning, 64, pp. 107-109.
38.
House Of Commons Public Administration Select Committee (2001) Sixth Report: Public Participation: Issues & Innovations. (Session 2000-01) HC 373. London: The Stationery Office.
39.
House Of Lords Select Committee On Science And Technology (2000) Third Report: Science and Society. (Session 1999-2000) HL38. London: The Stationery Office .
40.
Huxley, M. (2000) The limits to communicative planning, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19, pp 369-377.
41.
Innes, J.E. and Booher, D.E. (1999) Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: a framework for evaluating collaborative planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, 65, pp. 412-423.
42.
Ippr (Institute For Public Policy Research) ( 2004) Lonely Citizens: Report of the Working Party on Active Citizenship. London: IPPR.
43.
Irwin, A. (2001) Constructing the scientific citizen: science and democracy in the biosciences, Public Understanding of Science , 10, pp. 1-18.
44.
Jasanoff, S. (1996) The dilemma of environmental democracy, Issues in Science and Technology, 13, pp. 63-70.
45.
Jones, P.J.S., Burgess, J. and Bhattachary, D. (2001) An evaluation of approaches for promoting relevant authority and stakeholder participation in european marine sites in the UK English Nature (http://www.ukmarinesac.org.uk/pdfs/stake_holder.pdf).
46.
Kuper, R. (1997) Deliberating waste: the Hertfordshire citizens' jury, Local Environment, 2, pp. 40-53.
47.
Leach, S. and Wingfield, M. (1999) Public participation and the democratic renewal agenda; prioritisation or marginalisation?Local Government Studies, 25, pp. 46-59.
48.
Lga (Local Government Association) (1998) LGA response to DETR consultation paper modernising local government: local democracy and community leadership (http://www.lga.gov.uk/lga/blg/compact/mlg_democracy.pdf).
49.
Liberatore, A. and FuNTowicz, S. (2003) Democratising expertise, expertising democracy: what does this mean and why bother?, Science and Public Policy , 30, pp. 146-150.
50.
Lowndes, V., Pratchett, L. and Stoker, G. (2001a) Trends in public participation: part 1—local government perspectives, Public Administration, 79, pp. 205-222.
51.
Lowndes, V., Pratchett, L. and Stoker, G. (2001b) Trends in public participation: part 2-citizens' perspectives, Public Administration, 79, pp. 445-455.
52.
Martin, S. and Boaz, A. (2000) Public participation and citizen-centred local government: lessons from the best value and better government for older people pilot programme, Public Money and Management, 20, pp. 47-53.
53.
McGuirk, P.M. (2001) Situating communicative planning theory: context power and knowledge, Environment and Planning A, 33, pp. 195-217.
54.
Mciver, S. (1998) An evaluation of the Kings Fund citizens' jury programme. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Health Services Management Centre.
55.
Mosse, D. (2001) 'People's Knowledge' participation and patronage: operations and representations in rural development, in: B. Cooke and U. Kothari (Eds) Participation: the New Tyranny ?, pp. 16-35. London : Zed Books.
56.
Mouffe, C. (1999) Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? , Social Research, 66 pp. 745-758.
57.
O'Neill, J. (2001) Representing people, representing nature, representing the world, Environment and PlanningC, 19, pp. 483-500.
58.
Owens, S. (2000) Commentary: 'Engaging the public': information and deliberation in environmental policy, Environment and Planning A, 32, pp. 1141-1148.
59.
Parker, J. and Selman, P. (1999) Local government, local people and Local Agenda 21, in: S. Buckingham-Hatfield and S. Percy (Eds) Constructing Local Environmental Agendas: People, Places and Participation, pp.18-30. London : Routledge.
60.
Pateman, C. (1970) Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
Petts, J. (1995) Waste management strategy development: a case study of community involvement and consensus-building in Hampshire, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 38, pp. 519-536.
62.
Petts, J. (2001) Evaluating the effectiveness of deliberative processes: waste management case studies, Journal of Environmental Planning &Management, 44, pp. 207-226.
63.
Pickard, S. (1998) Citizenship and consumerism in health care: a critique of citizens' juries, Social Policy and Administration, 32, pp. 226-244.
64.
Ploger, J. (2001) Public participation and the art of governance , Environment and Planning B, 28, pp. 219-241.
65.
Post (Parliamentary Office For Science And Technology) (2001) Postnote: summary of Post Report 153 open channels: public dialogue in science and technology (http://www.parliament.uk/post/pn153.pdf).
66.
Pratchett, L. (1999) New fashions in public participation: towards greater democracy?, Parliamentary Affairs, 52, pp. 616-633.
67.
Rayner, S. (2003) Democracy in the age of assessment: reflections on the roles of expertise and democracy in public sector decision-making, Science and Public Policy, 30, pp.163-170.
68.
Rcep (Royal Commission On Environ-Mentalpollution) (1998) Setting Environmental Standards. London: The Stationery Office.
69.
RENN, 0., Webler, T. and Wiedemann, P. (Eds) (1995) Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse. London, KlewerAcademic Publishers.
70.
Research Councils Uk (2002) Dialogue with the public: practical guidelines ( http://www.rcukacuk/guidelines/dialogue/guide.pdf).
71.
Rosener, J.B. (1981) User-oriented evaluation: a new way to view citizen participation, Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 17, pp. 583-596.
72.
Rowe, G. and Frewer, L.J. (2000) Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation, ScienceTechnology and Human Values, 25, pp. 3-29.
73.
Rydin, Y. (2003) Conflict Consensus and Rationality in Environmental Planning: An Institutional Discourse Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
74.
Santos, S.L. and Chess, C. (2003) Evaluating citizen advisory boards: the importance of theory and participant-based criteria and practical implications, Risk Analysis, 23, pp. 269-279.
75.
Sommer, F. (2000) Monitoring and evaluating outcomes of community involvement: the LITMUS experience, Local Environment, 5, pp.483-491.
76.
Steele, J. and Seargent, J. (1999) Does public involement work?, Public Money and Management, 17, pp. 9-10.
77.
Stewart, J. (1996) Innovation in democratic practice in local government , Policy and Politics, 24, pp. 29-41.
78.
Tait, M. and Campbell, H. (2000) The politics of communication between planning officers and politicians: the exercise of power through discourse, Environment and Planning A, 32, pp. 489-506.
79.
Tewdwr-Jones, M. and Allmendinger, P. (1998) Deconstructing communicative rationality: a critique of Habermasian collaborative planning, Environment and Planning A, 30, pp. 1975-1989.
80.
Tewdwr-Jones, M. and Thomas, H. (1998) Collaborative action in local plan-making: planners' perceptions of 'planning through debate', Environment and Planning B, 25, pp. 127-144.
81.
Wakeford, T. (2001) In brief ... who's framing who? Some experimental evaluation criteria for DIPS, in: M. Pimbert and T. Wakeford (Eds) PLA Notes 40: Deliberative Democracy and Citizen Empowerment. International Institute for Environment and Development79-80 ( http://www.iied.org/docs/pla/pla_fs_whole.pdf).
82.
Wates, N. (1999) The Community Planning Handbook: How People can Shape their Cities, Towns or Villages in Any Part of the World. London: Earthscan.
83.
Wbc (Warrington Borough Council) (1999) Warrington Provisional Local Transport Plan. Transport Planning Group, Environmental Services Department, Warrington Borough Council .
84.
Wbc (2000a) Warrington Local Transport Plan: Part 1—Policies and Strategies. Strategic Transport Planning Group, Environmental Services Department .
85.
Wbc (2000b) Warrington Local Transport Plan: Part 2-Policies Report on Public Consultation . Strategic Transport Planning Group, Environmental Services Department, Warrington Borough Council.
86.
Wcc (Warwickshire County Council) (2000) Warwickshire's Local Transport Plan. Transport Strategy Group, Department of Planning Transport and Economic Strategy, Warwickshire County Council.
87.
Webler, T. (1995) Right discourse in public participation: an evaluative yardstick, in: O. Renn, T. Webler and P. WiEdermann (Eds) Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse, pp. 35-86. London : Kluwer Academic Publishers.
88.
Webler, T. and Tuler, S. (2000) Fairness and competence in citizen participation: theoretical reflections from a case study, Administration and Society, 32, pp. 566-595.
89.
Wilson, D. (1999) Exploring the limits of public participation in local government, Parliamentary Affairs, 52, pp. 246-259.
