Three Challenges for the Compact City as a Sustainable Urban Form: Household Consumption of Energy and Transport in Eight Residential Areas in the Greater Oslo Region
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2005
Three Challenges for the Compact City as a Sustainable Urban Form: Household Consumption of Energy and Transport in Eight Residential Areas in the Greater Oslo Region
The results of a recent survey conducted in eight residential areas in the Greater Oslo Region support the hypothesis that there is a connection between land use characteristics and household consumption of energy and transport. Findings from the survey also lend great support to the compact city as a sustainable urban form. However, three distinct findings indicate that decentralised concentration could lead to even lower energy use in households: while the extent of everyday travel decreases in densely populated areas, the central urban areas represent the highest level of leisure-time travel by plane; the access to a private garden limits the extent of leisure travel; and, the difference in energy use for housing between single-family and multifamily housing is reduced in housing built after 1980, indicating that the established conclusions on the most energy-efficient housing should be questioned.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aall., C. and Norland, I.T. (2002) Det ϕkologiske fotavtrykket for Oslo kommune [The ecological footprint of Oslo municipality]. Report 1/02, ProSus/University of Oslo.
2.
Aall, C., Holden, E. and Høyer, K.G. (2003) Bustad, forbruk og ϕkologiske fotavtrykk [Housing, consumption and ecological footprints]. Report 16/2003, Western Norway Research Institute, Sogndal.
3.
Banister, D. (1992) Energy use, transport and settlement patterns, in: M. J. Breheny (Ed.) Sustainable Development and Urban Form, pp. 160-181. London: Pion Ltd.
4.
Boarnet, M.G. and Crane, R. (2001) Travel by Design. The Influence of Urban Form on Travel, New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Breheny, M.J. (1992) The contradictions of the compact city: a review , in: M. J. Breheny (Ed.) Sustainable Development and Urban Form, pp. 138-159. London: Pion Ltd.
6.
Breheny, M. (1996) Centrists, decentrists and compromisers: views on the future of urban form, in: M. Jenks , E. Burton and K. Williams (Eds) The Compact City. A Sustainable Urban Form?, pp. 13-35. London: E & FN Spon.
7.
Buxton, M. (2000) Energy, transport and urban form in Australia, in: K. Williams, E. Burton and M. Jenks (Eds) Achieving Sustainable Urban Form, pp. 54-63. London: E & FN Spon.
8.
Cec (Commission Of The European Communities) ( 1990) Green Paper on the Urban Environment. Brussels: European Commission.
9.
Djupskås, O.T. and Nesbakken, R. (1995) Energibruk i husholdningene 1993 [Energy use in households 1993]. SSB Report 95/10, Statistics Norway, Oslo.
10.
Ecip (2003) European Common Indicators: Towards a Local Sustainability Profile. Milano: Ambiente Italia.
11.
Elkin, T., Mclaren, D. and Hillman, M. (1991) Reviving the City: Towards Sustainable Urban Development . London: Friends of the Earth.
12.
Enwicht, D. (1992) Towards an Eco-city: Calming the Traffic. Sydney: Envirobook.
13.
Frey, H. (1999) Designing the City: Towards a More Sustainable Urban Form. London: Spon Press.
14.
Gordon, P. and Richardson, H.W. (1989) Gasoline consumption and cities-a reply, Journal of the American Planning Association , 55(3), pp. 342-345.
15.
Hasic, T. (2000) A sustainable urban matrix: achieving sustainable urban form in residential buildings, in: K. Williams, E. Burton and M. Jenks (Eds) Achieving Sustainable Urban Form, pp. 329-336. London: E & FN Spon.
16.
Hellevik, O. (1991) Forskningsmetode i sosiologi og statsvitenskap [Research method in sociology and political science]. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
17.
Hille, J. (1995) Sustainable Norway. Oslo: The Project for an Alternative Future.
18.
Holden, E. (2001) Boligen som grunnlag for bœrekraftig forbruk [Housing as basis for sustainable consumption]. Dr.ing. thesis2001:115, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim .
19.
Holden, E. (2004) Ecological footprints and sustainable urban form, Journal of Housing and theBuilt Environment, 19(1), pp. 91-109.
20.
Høyer, K.G. and Holden, E. (2001) Housing as basis for sustainable consumption, International Journal on Sustainable Development, 1(4), pp. 48-58.
21.
Hyer, K.G. and Holden, E. (2003) Household consumption and ecological footprints in Norway: does urban form matter?, Journal of Consumer Policy , 26, pp. 327-349.
22.
Jacobs, J. (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities: The Failure of Town Planning. New York: Random House.
23.
JENKS, M., BuRToN, E. and Williams, K. (Eds) (1996) The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form?London: E & FN Spon.
24.
Kennedy, M. (1995) Ekologisk stadsplanering i Europa, in: Den miljövänliga staden-en Utopi? [Ecological urban planning in Europe] Rapport fran en seminarserie, Miljoprosjekt Sankt Jorgen , Gteborg.
25.
Lorek, S. and Spangenberg, J.H. (2001) Indicators for environmentally sustainable household consumption, International Journal of Sustainable Development, 1(4), pp. 101-120.
26.
Masnavi, M.-R. (2000) The new millennium and new urban paradigm: the compact city in practice, in: K. Williams , E. Burton and M. Jenks (Eds) Achieving Sustainable Urban Form, pp. 64-73. London: E & FN Spon.
27.
Mclaren, D. (1992) Compact or dispersed? Dilution is no solution, Built Environment, 18(4), pp. 268-284.
28.
MoE (Ministry Of Environment) (2002) Bedre milj i byer og tettsteder [A better environment in cities and towns] . Parliamentary White Paper no. 23 (2001- 2002), Ministry of Environment, Oslo.
29.
Næss, P. (1996) Urban Form and Energy Use for Transport: A Nordic Experience, Dr.ing. thesis1996:20, The Norwegian Institute of Technology, Trondheim.
30.
Næss, P. (1997) Fysisk planlegging og energibruk [Physical planning and energy use]. Oslo: Tano Aschehoug .
31.
Næss, P. (2000) Urban land use changes and mobility. Paper for the NTF Workshop: 'Driving Forces of Mobility', Stockholm, November.
32.
Næss, P. (2005) Residential location affects travel behaviour - but how and why? The case of Copenhagen Metropolitan Area, Progress in Planning, 63(1) (forthcoming).
33.
National Consumer Agency Of Denmark (1996) Miljbelastningen ved familiens aktiviteter [The environmental impact from households]. Report 1996:1, Forbrukerstyrelsen, Kbenhavn.
34.
Newman, P.W.G. and Kenworthy, J.R. (1989) Gasoline consumption and cities: a comparison of US cities with a global survey, Journal of the American Planning Association, 55(1), pp. 24-37.
35.
Newman, P., and Kenworthy, J.R. (1999) Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence. Washington, DC: Island Press.
36.
Newman, P. and Kenworthy, J. (2000) Sustainable urban form: the big picture, in: K. Williams, E. Burton and M. Jenks (Eds) Achieving Sustainable Urban Form, pp. 109-120. London: E & FN Spon.
37.
Newton, P. (2000) Urban form and environmental performance, in: K. Williams, E. Burton and M. Jenks (Eds) Achieving Sustainable Urban Form, pp. 46-53. London: E & FN Spon.
38.
Orrskog, L. and Snickars, F. (1992) On the sustainability of urban and regional structures , in: M. J. Breheny (Ed.) Sustainable Development and Urban Form, pp. 106-121. London: Pion Ltd.
39.
Owens, S. (1992) Energy, environmental sustainability and land use planning, in: M. J. Breheny (Ed.) Sustainable Development and Urban Form, pp. 79-105. London : Pion Ltd.
40.
Rådberg, J. (1995) Termitstack eller ekobyar? En diskussion om tathet och barekraftig stadsutvecling, in: H. Lehtonen and M. Johansson (Eds) Att omringa ekologi, pp. 115-123. C 36, VTT Byggnadsteknik, Esbo.
41.
Sherlock, H. (1991) Cities are Good for Us. London : Paladin.
42.
Simmonds, D. and Coombe, D. (2000) The transport implications of alternative urban forms, in: K. Williams, E. Burton and M. Jenks (Eds) Achieving Sustainable Urban Form, pp. 115-123. London : E & FN Spon.
43.
Skjeggedal, T., Nordtug, J., Wollan, G. and Ystad, D. (2003) Fortettingsrealisme [The realism of Densification] , Plan, 6, pp. 56-63.
44.
Smyth, H. (1996) Running the gauntlet: a compact city within a doughnut of decay, in: M. Jenks, E. Burton and K. Williams (Eds) The Compact City. A Sustainable Urban Form?, pp. 101-113. London: E & FN Spon.
45.
Stead, D., Williams, J. and Titheridge, H. (2000) Land use, transport and people: identifying the connections, in: K. Williams, E. Burton and M. Jenks (Eds) Achieving Sustainable Urban Form, pp. 174-186. London : E & FN Spon.
46.
Stoel, T.B. JR (1999) Reining in urban sprawl, Environment , 41(4), pp. 6-11.
47.
Thompson-Fawcett, M. (2000 ) The contribution of urban villages to sustainable development , in: K. Williams, E. Burton and M. Jenks (Eds) Achieving Sustainable Urban Form, pp. 275-285. London : E & FN Spon.
48.
Titheridge, H., Hall, S. and Banister, D. (2000) Assessing the sustainablity of urban development policies, in: K. Williams, E. Burton and M. Jenks (Eds) Achieving Sustainable Urban Form, pp. 149-159. London : E & FN Spon.
49.
Troy, P.N. (1996) Environmental stress and urban policy, in: K. Williams, E. Burton and M. Jenks (Eds) Achieving Sustainable Urban Form, pp. 200-212. London: E & FN Spon.
50.
Vilhelmson, B. (1990) Vår dagliga rrlighet: om resandes utveckling, frdelning och granser [Our daily mobility: on the development, distribution and limits of travelling]. TFB report 1990:16, The Swedish Transport Board, Stockholm.
51.
Wced (The World Commission On Environment And Development) (1987) Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
Williams, K., Burton, E. and Jenks, M. (2000a) Achieving sustainable urban form: an introduction , in: K. Williams, E. Burton and M. Jenks (Eds) Achieving Sustainable Urban Form, pp. 1-6. London : E & FN Spon.
53.
Williams, K., Burton, E. and Jenks, M. (2000b) Achieving sustainable urban form: conclusions , in: K. Williams, E. Burton and M. Jenks (Eds) Achieving Sustainable Urban Form, pp. 347-355. London : E & FN Spon.
