This paper introduces a Special Topic on social innovation in the governance of urban communities. It also seeks to widen the debate on the meaning of social innovation both in social science theory and as a tool for empirical research on socioeconomic development and governance at the local level. This debate is organised around ALMOLIN-i.e. alternative models for local innovation as utilised in the SINGOCOM (social innovation in governance in (local) communities) research. The first section explains the role of social innovation in neighbourhood development and how it is best addressed from theoretical, historical and experience-oriented viewpoints. The second section provides a survey of the definitions of social innovation in a variety of social science fields, while the third section mobilises various strands of literature that will be of use for the analytical refinement of ALMOLIN. Section four illustrates how ALMOLIN is used as an analytical tool for empirical research. The final section shows some avenues for future research on social innovation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abers, R.N. (2000) Inventing Local Democracy: Grassroots Politics in Brazil. Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.
2.
Avritzer, L. (2002) Democracy and the Public Space in Latin America . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
BECK, W., MAESEN, L. VAN DER THOMESE, F. and Walker, A. (Eds) (2001) Social Quality: A Vision for Europe. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
4.
Bouchard, M., Bourque, G. and Levesque, B. (2000) L'évaluation de l'économie sociale dans la perspective des nouvelles formes de régulation socio-économique de l'intérêt general. Working Paper No. 0013, Cahiers du CRISES, Montreal.
5.
Cars, C., Healey, P., Madanipour, A. and de Magalhaes, C. (2002) Urban Governance, Institutional Capacity and Social Milieu. Aldershot: Ashgate.
6.
Chambon, J.L., David, A. and Devevey, J.M. (1982) Les Innovations Sociales. Paris : PUF.
7.
Cohen, J. and Rogers, J. (1992) Secondary associations and democratic governance , Politics and Society, 20, pp. 393-472.
8.
Commons, J. (1934/1961) Institutional Economics. Its Place in Political Economy, Vol I. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
9.
Damanpour, F. (1991) Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of the effects of determinants and moderations, Academy of Management Journal, 34, pp. 555-590.
10.
Diesing, P. (1971) Patterns of Discovery in Social Sciences. Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton.
11.
Fainstein, S. and Hirst, C. (1995) Urban social movements, in: D. Judge, G. Stoker and H. Wolman (Eds) Theories of Urban Politics , pp. 181-204. London: Sage.
12.
Foucault, M. (1979) On governmentality, Ideology and Consciousness, 6, pp. 5-21.
13.
Gramsci, A. (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks, ed. and trans. by Q. Hoare and G. N. Smith.London: Lawrence and Wishart.
14.
Habermas, J. (1990) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere . Frankfurt: Suhrkamp [German edn including a preface to the new edn].
15.
Hajer, M. (1995) The Politics of Environmental Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
Häussermann, H., Kronauer, M. and Siebel, W. (Eds) ( 2004) An den Raendern der Staedte: Armut und Ausgrenzung. Frankfurt am-Main: Suhrkamp .
17.
Healey, P., de Magalhaes, C., Madanipour, A. and Pendlebury, J. (2003) Place, identity and local politics: analysing partnership initiatives, in: M. Ffajer and H. Wagenaar (Eds) Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society, pp. 60-87. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
18.
Hillier, J. (2002) Shadows of Power: An Allegory of Prudence in Land Use Planning. London: Routledge .
19.
Hillier, J., Moulaert, F. and Nussbaumer, J. (2004) Trois essais sur le role de l'innovation sociale dans le developpement spatial, Géographie, Economie, Société , 6, pp. 129-152.
20.
Innes, J.E. and Booher, D. (1999) Consensus-building and complex adaptive systems: a framework for evaluating collaborative planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, 65, pp. 412-423.
21.
Jessop, B. (2002) The Future of the Capitalist State. Oxford: Blackwell.
22.
Mayer, M. (2000) Social movements in European cities: transitions from the 1970s to the 1990s, in: A. Bagnasco and P. Le Gales (Eds) Cities in Contemporary Europe, pp. 131-152. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
23.
Mitchell, K. (2002) Transnationalism, neo-liberalism, and the rise of the shadow state, Economy and Society, 30(2), pp. 165-189.
24.
Moulaert, F. (2002) Globalisation and Integrated Area Development in European Cities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
Moulaert, F. and Hamdouch, A. (2005) New views of innovation systems: agents, rationales, networks and spatial scales in the knowledge infrastructure, The European Journal of Social Science Research (forthcoming).
26.
Moulaert, F. and Nussbaumer, J. (2006) L'innovation sociale au coeur des debats publics et scientifiques: un essai de deprivatisation de la societe, in: J. L. Klein (Ed.) L' Innovation Sociale. Ste-Foye : Presses Universitaire du Quebec (forthcoming).
27.
Moulaert, F. and Sekia, F. (2003) Territorial innovation models: a critical survey , Regional Studies, 37(3), pp. 289-302.
28.
Moulaert, F., Alaez Aller, R., Cooke, P. ET AL. (1990) Integrated Area Development and Efficay of Local Action. Lille: IFRESI/ CNRS.
29.
Moulaert, F., Delladetsima, P., Delvainquière, J.C. ET AL. (1992, 1993, 1994) Local development strategies in economically disintegrated areas: a pro-active strategy against poverty in the European Community. Reports for the EC, DG Research. IFRESI-CNRS, Lille.
30.
Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F. and Swyngedouw, E. (2005) Social innovation and governance in local communities. Final SINGOCOM report to the EC (FP6). Lille: IFRESI.
31.
Moulaert, F., Rodriguez, A. and Swyngedouw, E. (Eds) (2003) The Globalized City: Economic Restructuring and Social Polarization in European Cities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
Mumford, M.D. (2002) Social innovation: ten cases from Benjamin Franklin , Creativity Research Journal, 14(2), pp. 253-266.
33.
Münkler, H. (2001) Buergergesellschaft und Sozialstaat. Paper presented to Enquete-Kommission Zukunft des bürgerschaftlichen Engagements. Hall, July.
34.
Neamtan, N. (2002) The social and solidarity economy: towards an 'alternative' globalisation. Background paper for theSymposium on Citizenship and Globalisation organised by The Carold Institute, Vancouver, June (http://www.clcr.org/publications/html/neamtan%20on%20the%20social%20economy110602.htm).
35.
Novy, A. (2001) Brasilien: Die Unordnung der Peripherie. Von der Sklavenhaltergesellschaft zur Diktatur des Geldes. Vienna : Promedia.
36.
Pickvance, C. (2003) From urban social movements to urban movements: a review and an introduction to a symposium on urban movements, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27, pp 102-109.
37.
Schumpeter, J. (1942) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Allan and Unwin.
38.
Seoane, J. and Taddei, E. (2002) From Seattle to Porto Alegre: the anti-neoliberal globalization movement, Current Sociology, 50, pp. 99-122.
39.
Swyngedouw, E. (2000) Authoritarian governance, power and the politics of rescaling, Environment and Planning D, 18, pp. 63-76.
40.
Swyngedouw, E., Moulaert, F. and Rodriguez, A. (2003) 'The world in a grain of sand': large-scale urban development projects and the dynamics of 'glocal' transformations, in: F. Moulaert, E. Swyngedouw and A. Rodriguez (Eds) The Globalized City: Economic Restructuring and Social Polarization in European Cities pp. 9-28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
Whitehead, M. (2003) 'In the shadow of hierarchy': meta-governance, policy reform and urban regeneration in the West Midlands, Area, 35(1), pp. 6-14.
