Young entrepreneurs establishing enterprises in Hanoi, Vietnam, are faced with an economic environment very different from that of their parents' generation, as doi moi (renovation) introduced in 1986 creates an increasingly capitalist market economy. Drawing on field studies in Hanoi we consider whether such entrepreneurs are able to take advantage of social capital networks-namely, bonding, bridging or linking, or indeed if they are disadvantaged by them in the establishment and operations of their enterprises. Our findings show that whilst bonding capital is an essential tool for 'getting by', albeit with negative consequences at times, bridging and linking social capital are not nearly as well formed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrami, R. (2002) Just a peasant: economy and legacy in northern Vietnam, in: P. Leonard and D. Kaneff (Eds) Post-socialist Peasant? Rural and Urban Constructions of Identity in Eastern Europe, East Asia and the former SovietUnion, pp. 94-116. Basingstoke: Pal-grave.
2.
Adler, P.S. and Kwon, S.-W. (2002) Social capital: prospects for a new concept, Academy of Management Review, 27, pp. 17-40.
3.
Appold, S., Nguyen, Q.T., Kasarda, J.D. and Le, N.H. (1996) Entrepreneurship in a restructuring economy: small private manufacturers in Hanoi, Journal of Asian Business , 12, pp. 1-31.
4.
Beresford, M. and McFarlane, B. (1995) Regional inequality and regionalism in Vietnam and China, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 25, pp. 50-72.
5.
Beugelsdijk, S. and Smulders, S. (2003) Bridging and bonding social capital: which type is good for economic growth? Paper presented at the European Economic Association and Econometric Society Conference, August, Stockholm.
6.
Boothroyd, P. and Pham, X. N. (Eds) (2000) Socioeconomic Renovation in Vietnam: The Origin, Evolution, and Impact of Doi Moi. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
7.
Bourdieu, P. (1972/1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Bourdieu, P. (1980) Le sens pratique. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
9.
Bourdieu, P. (1986) The forms of capital, in: J. G. Richards (Ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, pp. 241-258. New York: Greenwood Press.
10.
Bradach, J.L. and Eccles, R.G. (1991) Price, authority and trust: from ideal types to plural forms, in: G. Thompson, J. Frances, R. Levacic and J. Mitchell (Eds) Markets, Hierarchies and Networks: The Coordination of Social Life, pp. 277-292. London : Sage Publications.
11.
Cac, N. ( 2003) Co gai tre va nhung chiec banh bao [A young girl and the pao cakes]. Nhan Dan (http://www.nhandan.org.vn/vietnamese/today/kinhte/201003/cla_cogai.htm).
12.
Cao, L.A. (2002) Kinh te tu nhan van kho tiep can von ngan hang [It is still difficult for private businesses to access bank loans], Thoi bao Ngan hang [Banking Times], 4 September (http://netsoft.vnn.vn/doanhnghiep/news/detail.cfm?URLOfNews=/tintuc/diendandn/20020904130819.kinhtetunhan.htm).
13.
Carpenter, J.P., Daniere, A.G. and Takahashi, L.M. (2004a) Cooperation, trust, and social capital in southeast Asian urban slums, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization , 55, pp. 533-551.
14.
Carpenter, J.P., Daniere, A.G. and Takahashi, L.M. (2004b) Social Capital and Trust in South-east Asian Cities, UrbanStudies, 41(4), pp.853-874.
15.
Cohen, M. (2002) Economic monitor, Vietnam: new entrepreneurs, Far Eastern Economic Review, 165, p. 44.
16.
Coleman, J. (1987) Norms as social capital, in: G. Radnitzky and P. Bernholz (Eds) Economic Imperialism: The Economic Method Applied outside the Field of Economics, pp. 135-155, New York: Paragon House Publishers.
17.
Coleman, J. (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital , American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), pp. S95-S120.
18.
Coleman, J. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
Dalton, R., Pham, M.H., Pham, T.N. and Nhu-Ngoc T.O. (2002) Social relations and social capital in Vietnam: findings from the 2001 World Values Survey, Comparative Sociology , 1, pp. 369-386.
20.
Dien Dan Doanh nghiep [Enterprise Forum] ( 2002) Co che lai suat moi bat loi cho doanh nghiep nho [The new credit mechanism is unfavourable for small enterprises], 10 June (http://www.stockmarket.vnn.vn/tintuc/taichinh/10a0602.htm ).
21.
Digregorio, M.R. (1994) Urban harvest: recycling as a peasant industry in Northern Vietnam. Occasional Paper, No. 17, East-West Center, Hawaii.
22.
Duong P. (2002) The benefits of flying the corporate nest, Vietnam Investment Review, 25 February.
23.
Durlauf, S.N. (1999) The case 'against' social capital, Focus, 20(3), pp. 1-5.
24.
Durlauf, S.N. and Fafchamps, M. (2004) Social Capital. Working Paper No. 10485, National Bureau of Economic Research, Massachusetts.
25.
Fahey, S. (1997) Vietnam and the 'Third Way': the nature of socio-economic transition, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie , 88, pp. 469-480.
26.
Freeman, D. (1996) Doi moi policy and the small-enterprise boom in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, Geographical Review, 86, pp. 178-197.
27.
Fukuyama, F. (1996) Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity . New York: The Free Press.
28.
Grabher, G. (1993) Rediscovering the social in the economics of interfirm relations, in: G. Grabher (Ed.) The Embedded Firm: On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks, pp. 1-31. London : Routledge.
29.
Han B. ( 2003) Ngan hang canh tranh lai suat, doanh nghiep thiet hai [Banks competing on interest rates cause enterprises to lose out], Vnexpress, 29 July (http://vnexpress.net/Vietnam/Kinh-doanh/2003/07/3B9CA1A7/).
30.
Hansen, H., Rand, J. and Tarp, F. (2004) SME growth and survival in Vietnam: did direct government support matter? Discussion Paper 04-13, Institute of Economics, University of Copenhagen.
31.
Harriss, J. and Renzio, P. De (1997) 'Missing link' or analytically missing?: the concept of social capital, Journal of International Development, 9(7), pp. 919-937.
32.
Higgs, P. (1999) Footpath traders in a Hanoi neighbourhood: a case study of changing social relations and economic transition. Unpublished MA thesis, Victoria University of Technology, Australia.
33.
Higgs, P. (2003) Footpath traders in a Hanoi neighbourhood, in: L. Drummond and M. Thomas (Eds) Consuming Urban Culture in Contemporary Vietnam, pp. 75-88. London: RoutledgeCurzon .
34.
Irvin, G. (1995) Vietnam: assessing the achievements of Doi Moi , Journal of Development Studies, 31, pp. 725-751.
35.
Kerkvliet, B. (1995) Rural society and state relations, in: B. Kerkvliet and D. Porter (Eds) Vietnam's Rural Transformation, pp. 65-96. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
36.
Le, D.D. (1997) Doi moi kinh te: thanh tuu, bai hoc va trien vong [Economic reform: achievements, lessons and prospects], in: N. Tran (Ed.) Co mot Viet Nam nhu the: doi moi va phat trien [There is such a Vietnam: renovation and development] , pp. 65-91. Hanoi: Nha xuat ban Chinh tri Quoc gia .
37.
Le, N.H. and Rondinelli, D. (1993) Small business development and economic transformation in Vietnam, Journal of Asian Business, 9, pp. 1-23.
38.
Li, T. (1996) Peasants on the move. Occasional Paper No. 91, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore.
39.
Lin, N. ( 2001) Social Capital. A Theory of Social Structure and Action . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Malesky, E.J. (2004) Entrepreneurs on the periphery: a study of private sector development beyond the high performing cities and provinces of Vietnam. Private Sector Discussion Paper No. 18, Mekong Project Development Facility, Hanoi.
41.
Nguyen, P.A. (2002) Looking beyond Bien Che: the considerations of young Vietnamese graduates when seeking employment in the Doi Moi era, SOJOURN: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 17, pp. 221-248.
42.
Nguyen, P.A. (2003) Pursuing success in a globalising Vietnam: young graduates in Hanoi, in: D. McCargo (Ed.) Rethinking Vietnam, pp. 165-176. London: Routledge.
43.
Nguyen, P.Q.T., Bui, T.A., Han, M.T. ET AL. (2001) Doing business under the new enterprise law: a survey of newly registered companies. Private Sector Discussion Paper No. 12, Mekong Project Development Facility, Hanoi.
44.
Norlund, I. (2003) Social capital or social capitalism: diversification of the Vietnamese rural scenery. Paper presented to the International Conference 'Modernisation and Social Transformation in Vietnam: Social Capital Formation and Institution Building'. Munich Institute for Social Sciences and Hanoi Institute of Socio-economic Development Studies, Hanoi.
45.
Policy Research Initiative (2003) Social capital workshop: report of findings. June 19. Government of Canada (http://policyresearch.gc.ca/page.asp?pagenm=socap ).
46.
Portes, A. (1998) Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology, Annual Review of Sociology, 24, pp. 1-24.
47.
Portes, A. and Landolt, P. (2000) Social capital: promise and pitfalls of its role in development, Journal of Latin American Studies, 32(2), pp. 529-547.
48.
Powell, W.W. (1991) Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization, in: G. Thompson, J. Frances, R. Levacic and J. Mitchell (Eds) Markets, Hierarchies and Networks. The Coordination of Social Life, pp. 265-276. London : Sage Publications.
49.
Putnam, R. (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50.
Putnam, R. (1995) Tuning in, tuning out: the strange disappearance of social capital in America, PS: Political Science and Politics , December, pp. 664-683.
51.
Putnam, R. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
52.
Ronnås, P. (1998) The transformation of the private manufacturing sector in Vietnam in the 1990s . Working Paper Series in Economic and Finance No. 241, Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden.
53.
Ronnås, P. (2001) Introduction, in: P. Ronnås and B. Ramamurthy (Eds) Entrepreneurship in Vietnam: Transformations and Dynamics, pp. 1-28. Copenhagen : Nordic Institute of Asian Studies; and Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
54.
Ronnås, P. and Ramamurthy, B. (Eds) (2001) Entrepreneurship in Vietnam. Transformations and Dynamics. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies; and Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
55.
Ronnås, P. and Sjöberg, Ö. (1991) Introduction: a socio-economic strategy for Vietnam , in: P. Ronnås and Ö. Sjöberg (Eds) Socio-Economic Development in Vietnam - The Agenda for the 1990s, pp. 1-17. Stockholm: Swedish International Development Authority.
56.
Russell, G. (2001) Land of paradox, Asian Business , 37, pp. 62-63.
57.
Silvey, R. and Elmhirst, R. (2003) Engendering social capital: women workers and rural-urban networks in Indonesia's crisis, World Development, 31, pp. 865-879.
58.
SME.COM.VN (2003) Enterprise development for economic growth and poverty reduction. GTZ SME Promotion in Vietnam (sme.com.vn website).
59.
Socialist Republic Of Vietnam (1995) The Constitutions of Vietnam, 1946-1959-1980-1992. Hanoi : The Gioi Publishers.
60.
Socialist Republic Of Vietnam (2001) Decree of the Government on Supporting for Development of Small and Medium Enterprises. No. 90/2001/CP-ND. Hanoi, 23 November (translation accessed at http://www.sme-gtz.org.vn/ ).
61.
Song, L. (2003) Chang trai tao bao [A daring young man], Nhan Dan (http://www.nhandan.org.vn/vietnamese/today/chinhtri/18-3-sukien_binhluan_chang.htm).
62.
Steer, L. and Taussig, M. (2002) A Little Engine that Could...: domestic private companies and Vietnam's pressing need for wage employment. Policy Research Working Paper No. 2873, World Bank, August.
63.
Tenev, S., Carlier, A., Chaudry, O. and Nguyen, Q.-T. (2003) Informality and the playing field in Vietnam's business sector. The World Bank and the International Finance Corporation, Washington DC.
64.
Thai, D. T. (Ed.) (1995) Nghien cuu con nguoi Viet Nam: Cac quan diem va phuong phap tiep can [Studying the Vietnamese people: perspectives and approaches]. Hanoi : Chuong trinh khoa hoc cong nghe cap nha nuoc KX-07.
65.
Trinh, D.L. (2000) Su phan tang xa hoi trong qua trinh phat trien kinh te theo co che thi truong [Social stratification in the process of economic development in the market mechanism], in H. T. Ha (Ed.) Nhung tac dong tieu cuc cua co che kinh te thi truong o Viet Nam [Negative impacts of the market economic mechanism in Vietnam] , pp. 39-75. Hanoi: Nha xuat ban Khoa hoc Xa hoi.
66.
Tuoi Tre [Young People Newspaper] (2001) Ngan hang khong the phan biet doi xu voi cac doanh nghiep [There shouldn't be a differentiated treatment for enterprises], 8 January.
67.
Turner, S. (2003) Indonesia's Small Entrepreneurs: Trading on the Margins. London: CurzonRoutledge .
68.
Vietnam Economic Times (2002) Young entrepreneurs gathering to discuss business, VnForum, 23 January (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vnforum).
69.
Vietnam Investment Review (2003) Small, medium businesses missing out on bank loans, 18 August.
70.
Vietnam News (2002) Viet Nam's young entrepreneurs scope out a brave new business environment, Vnforum, 4 December (http://mail.saigon.com/pipermail/vnforum/2002-December/000543.html ).
71.
Vo, X.H. and Baumgarte, R. (2000) Economic reform, private sector development, and the business environment in Viet Nam, Comparative Economic Studies, 42(3), pp. 1-30.
72.
Woolcock, M. (2001) The place of social capital in understanding social and economic outcomes, Isuma, 2, pp. 11-17.
73.
Woolcock, M. and Narayan, D. (2000) Social capital: implications for development theory, research, and policy, The World Bank Research Observer, 15, pp. 225-249.
