It has frequently been suggested in the literature that a polycentric distribution of employment and people shortens commuting distances because people locate within or close to their employment sub-centre (the co-location hypothesis). Having studied the three biggest French metropolitan areas over the past decade it has been established that co-location affects only a minority of inhabitants, of whom there are fewer in 1999 than there were nine years earlier. Indeed, the majority of people living in a sub-centre work outside their sub-centre of residence. This situation was even more marked in 1999 than it was in 1990. In addition to this, the majority of jobs located in sub-centres are held by non-residents who are generally living further and further from their place of work.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aguilera, A. and Mignot, D. (2002) Structure des localisations intra-urbaines et mobilite domicile-travail, Recherche Transport Sécurité, 77, pp. 311-325.
2.
Aguilera, A. and Mignot, D. (2003) Estrategias de localizacion de las empresas y dinamicas urbanas. el caso de Lyon, in: D. Villareal Gonzalez, D. Mignot and D. Hiernaux (Eds) Dinamicas metropolitanas y estructuracion territorial: Estudio Comparativo Mexico-Francia, pp. 39-56. Mexico City: Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana .
3.
Anas, A., Arnott, R. and Small, K.A. (1998) Urban spatial structure, Journal of Economic Literature, 36, pp. 1426-1464.
4.
Banister, D., Watson, S. and Wood, C. (1997) Sustainable cities, transport, energy and urban form, Environment and Planning B, 24, pp. 125-143.
5.
Berroir, S., Mathian, H. and Saint-Julien, T. (2002) Deplacements domicile-travail: vers le polycentrisme, INSEE Ile-de-France Regards, 54, pp. 5-8.
6.
Bourne, L.S. (1989) Are new urban forms emerging ? Empirical tests for Canadian urban areas, The Canadian Geographer, 4, pp. 312-328.
7.
Cervero, R. and Kockelman, K. (1997) Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design, Transportation Research D, 3, pp. 199-219.
8.
Cervero, R. and Wu, K.L. (1997) Polycentrism, commuting and residential location in the San Francisco Bay area, Environment and Planning A , 29, pp. 865-886.
9.
Clark, W.A. and Kuijpers-Linde, M. (1994) Commuting in restructuring urban regions, UrbanStudies, 31, pp. 465-483.
10.
Dubin, R. (1991) Commuting patterns and firm decentralization, Land Economics, 1, pp. 15-29.
11.
Fujita, M. and Ogawa, H. (1982) Multiple equilibria and structural transition of non-monocentric urban configurations, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 12, pp. 161 - 196.
12.
Gallez, C. and Orfeuil, J.-P. (1998) Dis moi ou tu habites, je te dirai comment tu te deplaces, in: D. Pumain and M. F. Mattei (Eds) Données urbaines 2, pp. 157-164. Paris: Anthropos, Economica.
13.
Gaschet, F. (2002) The new intraurban dynamics: suburbanisation and functional specialization in French cities, Papers in Regional Science, 1, pp. 63-81.
14.
Giuliano, G. and Small, K.A. (1991) Subcenters in the Los Angeles region, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2, pp. 163-182.
15.
Giuliano, G. and Small, K.A. (1993) Is the journey to work explained by urban structure? , Urban Studies, 30, pp. 1485-1500.
16.
Gordon, P. and Richardson, H.W. (1996) Beyond polycentricity. The dispersed metropolis, Los Angeles, 1970-1990, Journal of the American Planning Association, 3, pp. 289-295.
17.
Gordon, P., Richardson, H.W. and Jun, M.I. (1991) The commuting paradox: evidence from the top twenty , Journal of the American Planning Association, 4, pp. 416-420.
18.
Gordon, P., Richardson, H.W. and Wong, H.L. (1986) The distribution of population and employment in a polycentric city: the case of Los Angeles, Environment and Planning A, 18, pp. 161-173.
19.
Hamilton, B. (1982) Wasteful commuting, Journal of Political Economy, 5, pp. 1035-1053.
20.
Handy, S. (1996) Methodologies for exploring the link between urban form and travel behavior, Transportation Research D, 2, pp. 151-165.
21.
van der Laan, N. (1998) Changing urban systems: an empirical analysis at two spatial levels, Regional Studies, 32, pp. 235-247.
22.
Levine, J.C. (1992) Decentralization of jobs and emerging suburban commute, Transportation Research Record, 1364, pp. 71-80.
23.
Levine, J.C. (1999) Access to choice, Access, 14, pp. 16-19.
24.
Massot, M.H. and Roy, E. (2004) Lieu de vie-Lieu de travail: 25 ans d' evolution de la distance au travail, rapport INRETS, Arcueil.
25.
McDonald, J.F. (1987) The identification of urban employment subcenters , Journal of Urban Economics, 21, pp. 242-258.
26.
Mcmillen, D.P. and Smith, S.C. (2003) The number of subcenters in large urban areas, Journal of Urban Economics, 53, pp. 321-338.
27.
Priemus, H., Nijkamp, P. and Banister, D. (2001) Mobility and spatial dynamics: an uneasy relationship, Journal of TransportGeography, 9, pp. 167-171.
28.
Richardson, H.W. (1988) Monocentric vs. polycentric models: the future of urban economics in regional science, Annals of Regional Science, 2, pp. 1-12.
29.
Sasaki, K. (1990) The establishment of a sub-center and urban spatial structure, Environment and Planning A, 22, pp. 369-383.
30.
Sasaki, K. and Mun, S.-E. (1996) A dynamic analysis of multiple-center formation in a city, Journal of Urban Economics, 40, pp. 257-278.
31.
Schwanen, T., Dieleman, F.M. and Dijst, M. (2001) Travel behavior in Dutch monocentric and polycentric urban systems, Journal of TransportGeography, 9, pp. 173-186.
32.
Schwanen, T., Dieleman, F.M. and Dijst M. (2002) The impact of metropolitan structure on commute behaviour in the Netherlands: a multilevel approach. Paper presented to the 42nd ERSA Congress, Dortmund.
33.
Sultana, S. (2000) Some effects of employment centers on commuting times in the Atlanta metropolitan area, 1990, Southeastern Geographer, 2, pp. 225-233.
34.
Talbot, J. (2001) Les deplacements domicile-travail: de plus en plus d'actifs travaillent loin de chez eux, Insee Premiere, 767.
35.
Wachs, M., Taylor, B.D., Levine, N. and Ong, P. (1993) The changing commute: a case-study of the jobs-housing relationship over time, Urban Studies, 30, pp. 1711-1729.
