Paying for Quietness: The Impact of Noise on Geneva Rents

Abstract

Using the hedonic approach, this paper analyses housing market data to infer the impact of noise on rents in Geneva, Switzerland. Using three different databases, including a geographical information system (GIS), structural, accessibility and environmental variables were obtained for a large proportion of apartments rented in Geneva. The paper is thus in line with the new generation hedonic models, which exploit the vast potential of GIS to obtain large databases including detailed characteristics of the apartments. In addition, different and original measures of noise were used in order to assess possible differences of the noise impact on rents, while existing studies typically refer to a single noise index. This paper assesses the impacts of noise related to all sources, but also to airport noise only, while existing studies usually refer to road or aircraft noise. The results can be summarised as follows. First, it is shown that the impact of all sources of noise on rents at the level of the whole canton is about 0.7 per cent per dB(A) and about 1 per cent when considering exclusively airplane noise, in the airport area. Secondly, this impact does not change fundamentally depending on the different measures of noise used in the estimations. Thirdly, the impact of noise does not depend on the institutional structure of the market-i.e. it is relatively similar in the private rental sector and in apartments directly under government control, although in the former the dynamic of noise has a greater impact. Fourthly, the results show that noise also has a higher economic impact, when the background noise level is lower. And fifthly, air pollution has a distinct impact on rents, in addition to noise.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bateman, I. , Day, B. , Lake, I. and Lovett, A. (2001) The effect of road traffic on residential property values: a literature review and hedonic price study. Scottish Executive Transport Research Series. Edinburgh: The Stationery Office.

Bateman, I.J. , Jones, A.P. , Lovett, A. ET AL. (2001) Applying geographical information systems (GIS) to environmental and resource economics, Environmental and Resource Economics, 22, pp. 219-269.

Bergh, J. C. J. M. Van Den (Ed.) (1999 ) Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar.

Berglund, B. , Lindvall, T and Schwela, D. H. (Eds) ( 1999): WHO Guidelines for Community Noise. Geneva: World Health Organisation.

Breush, T. and Pagan, A. (1979) A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation, Econometrica, 47, pp. 1287-1294.

Buechel, S. (1993): La méthode hédoniste: une application au cas des logements à Genève. Diploma in Economics and Finance No. 93.01, University of Geneva.

Cassel, E. and Mendelsohn, R. (1985) The choice of functional forms for the hedonic price equations: comment, Journal of Urban Economics, 18, pp. 135-142.

Cropper, M.L. , Deck, L.B. and McConnell, K.E. (1988) On the choice of functional form for hedonic price functions, Review of Economics and Statistics, 70, pp. 668-675.

Day, B. ( 2001) The theory of hedonic markets: Obtaining welfare measures for changes in environmental quality using hedonic market data. London: CSERGE-UCL.

10.

Ec (European Commission) (1999) Economic Evaluation of a Directive on National Emission Ceilings for Certain Atmospheric Pollutants. Brussels: EC.

11.

Eu (European Union) (2002) Directive 2002/ 49/ EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 189/12, Brussels.

12.

Goodman, A.C. (1998) Andrew Court and the invention of hedonic price analysis, Journal of Urban Economics, 44, pp. 291-298.

13.

Grosclaude, P. and Soguel, N. (1992) Couts externes du trafic routier: evaluation en milieu urbain, Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 128(3), pp. 453-469.

14.

Halvorsen, R. and Pollakowski, H.O. (1981) Choice of functional form for hedonic price equations, Journal of Urban Economics, 10, pp. 37-49.

15.

Hawkins, R. (1999) Review of studies on external costs of noise. London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Environment Protection Economics Division.

16.

Iten, R. and Maibach, M. (1992) Externe Kosten durch Verkehrslarm in Stadt und Agglomeration Zurich, Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics , 128(1), pp. 51-68.

17.

Jörg, U. (2002): Des faits et des chiffres. Press conference, 31 January OFEFP, Berne.

18.

Lake, I.R. , Lovett, A.A. , Bateman, I.J. and Langford, I.H. (1998) Modelling environmental influences on property prices in an urban environment, Computer, Environment and Urban Systems, 22(2), pp. 121-136.

19.

Lawrence, R.J. (1996): Switzerland, in: P. Balchin (Ed.) Housing Policy in Europe, pp. 36-50. London : Routledge.

20.

Miedema, H.M.E. and Oudshoorn, C.G.M. (2001) Annoyance from transportation noise: relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence interval, Environmental Health Perspectives, 109(4), pp. 409-416.

21.

Navrud, S. (2002) The state-of-the-art on economic valuation of noise. Final Report to European Commission, Directorate General Environment, 14 April.

22.

Nelson, J.P. (1980) Airports and property values, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 14(1), pp. 37-52.

23.

Nelson, J.P. (1982) Highway noise and property values, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 16(2), pp. 117-138.

24.

Nelson, J.P. (2004) Meta-analysis of airport noise and hedonic property values, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 38(1), pp. 1-28. OECD (ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT) (2001) OECD Environmental Outlook. Paris: OECD.

25.

Ofefp (Office Federal De L' Environnement, Des Forets Et Du Paysage) (1998) Caractère economiquement supportable et proportionnalité des mesures de protection contre le bruit. Cahier de l'environnement No. 301. Berne: OFEFP.

26.

OFEFP (2002) Fiche d'information lutte contre le bruit. Berne: OFEFP, January.

27.

OFS(Office Federal De La Statistique) and Ofefp (1997) L'environnement en Suisse, 1997. Berne: OFS and OFEFP.

28.

OFS and OFEFP ( 2002) Environnement Suisse. Berne: OFS and OFEFP.

29.

Palmquist, R.B. (1991) Hedonic methods, in: J. B. BRADEN and C. D. KoLsTAD (Eds) Measuring the Demandfor Environmental Quality, pp. 77-120. North-Holland : Elsevier.

30.

Palmquist, R.B. (1992) Valuing localized externalities, Journal of Urban Economics, 31, pp. 59-68.

31.

Palmquist, R.B. (1999) Hedonic models, in: J. C. J. M Van Den Bergh (Ed.) (1999) Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, pp. 765-776. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

32.

Palmquist, R.B. (2005) Property value models, in K.-G. Mäler and J. Vincent (Eds) Handbook of Environmental Economics, vol. 2. Amsterdam: North Holland (forthcoming).

33.

Pearce, D.W. and Markandya, A. (1989) Environmental Policy Benefits: Monetary Valuation . Paris: OECD.

34.

Pommerehne, W.W. (1987) L'évaluation des gains et des pertes d'amenites: le cas du bruit provenant du trafic, in: P. Burgat and C. Jeanrenaud (Eds) Services publics locaux, pp. 197-220. Paris: Economica.

35.

Rosen, S. (1974) Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition, Journal of Political Economy, 82, pp. 34-55.

36.

Salvi, M. (2003) Spatial Estimation of the Impact of Airport Noise on Residential Housing Prices. Zurich: Zürcher Kantonalbank.

37.

Sheppard, S. (1999) Hedonic analysis of housing markets, in: P. Cheshire and E. S. Mills (Eds) Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol. 3 , pp. 1595-1635. Amsterdam: North Holland .

38.

Soguel, N. (1994) Evaluation monétaire des atteneintes à L'environmement: une étude hédoniste et contingente sur l'impact des transports. Neuchatel: EDES.

39.

Sommer, H. , Suter, S. , Lenz, C. and Salvi, M. (2000) Externe Lärmekosten des Verkhers-Hedonic Pricing Analyse. Bern: ECOPLAN.

40.

Thalmann, P. (1987) Explication empirique des loyers lausannois, Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 123(1), pp. 47-70.

41.

Us Omb (United States, Office Of Management And Budget) (1996) Economic Analysis of Federal Regulations Under Executive Order 12866. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.