Through a case study of a private developer of housing in India, this paper critically examines the policy advice of enabling markets and market-based actors to provide affordable housing in developing countries. In this case, after receiving public sector help, the developer stopped constructing housing for low-income groups. The paper argues for a more cautious, circumspect and varied approach because enabling strategies focused on market actors can produce highly uncertain outcomes. In addition, it emphasises that policy-makers need a better understanding of how the informal and formal sectors can overlap. Enabling informal developers can be even trickier because public support can reduce their flexibility and incentives, as well as impacting on the expectations and opportunities of the home-buyers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adusumilli, U. (1999) Partnership approaches in India, in: G. Payne (Ed.) Making Common Ground: Public-Private Partnerships in Land for Housing, pp. 17-45. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
2.
Ahmed, N. (1999) Public/private partnerships in Pakistan, in: G. Payne (Ed.) Making Common Ground: Public-Private Partnerships in Land for Housing, pp. 46-63. London : Intermediate Technology Publications.
3.
Amis, P. (1984) Squatters or tenants: the commercialization of unauthorized housing in Nairobi, World Development, 12, pp. 87-96.
4.
Baken, R. and Linden, J. Van Der (1993) Getting the incentives right, Third World Planning Review, 15, pp. 1-22.
5.
Baken, R. and Smets, P. (1999) Better a hut on the ground than a castle in the air: formal and informal housing finance for the urban poor in India, in: K. Datta and G. Jones (Eds) Housing and Finance in Developing Countries , pp. 101-118. London: Routledge.
6.
Bhatnagar, K. (1996) HUDCO-an innovative public sector undertaking, in: K. Singii and F. Steinberg (Eds) Urban India in Crisis, pp. 49-57. New Delhi: New Age International Publishers.
7.
Blaesser, B. (1981) Clandestine development in Colombia. Report prepared for the United StatesAgency for International Development . Washington, DC: USAID.
8.
Business India (2002) Real potential , 19 August-1 September, pp. 42-48.
9.
Doebele, W. (1975) The private market and low-income urbanization in developing countries: the pirate subdivisions of Bogota. Discussion Paper No. D75-1, Department of City and Regional Planning, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
10.
Dowall, D. (1989) Bangkok: a profile of an efficiently performing housing market, Urban Studies, 26, pp. 327-339.
11.
Durand-Lasserve, A. (1987) Land and housing in Third World cities, Cities, 4, pp. 325-336.
12.
Durand-Lasserve, A. (1999) Partnerships between public sector and informal actors: some comments on Asian and sub-Saharan African case studies, in: G. Payne (Ed.) Making Common Ground: Public-Private Partnerships in Land for Housing, pp. 134-152. London : Intermediate Technology Publications.
13.
Gilbert, A. (2002) Power, ideology and the Washington consensus: the development and spread of the Chilean housing policy, Housing Studies, 17, pp. 305-324.
14.
Government Of India (1994) National Housing Policy. New Delhi: Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India.
15.
Hamdi, N. (1991) Housing Without Houses: Participation, Flexibility, Enablement. New York: van Nostrand Reinhold.
16.
Jones, G. (1996) The difference between truth and adequacy: (re)joining Baken, van der Linden and Malpezzi, Third World Planning Review , 18, pp. 243-256.
17.
Jones, G. and Datta, K. (2000) Enabling markets to work? housing policy in the 'new' South Africa, International PlanningStudies, 5, pp.393-416.
18.
Jones, G. and Ward, P. (1995) The blind men and the elephant: a critic's reply , Habitat International, 19, pp. 61-72.
19.
Joshi, S. (1995) Urban housing by private builders. Postgraduate dissertation, Centre for Environmental Planning and Technology , Ahmedabad.
20.
Keivani, R. and Werna, E. (2001a) Refocusing the housing debate in developing countries from a pluralist perspective, Habitat International, 25, pp. 191-208.
21.
Keivani, R. and Werna, E. (2001b) Modes of housing provision in developing countries , Progress in Planning, 55, pp. 65-118.
22.
Kusnetzoff, F. (1987) Urban and housing policies under Chile's military dictatorship: 1973-1985, Latin American Perspectives, 14, pp. 157-186.
23.
Linn, J. (1983) Cities in the Developing World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
Malpezzi, S. (1990) Urban housing and financial markets: some international comparisons, UrbanStudies, 27, pp. 971-1022.
25.
Malpezzi, S. (1994) Getting the incentives right-a reply to Robert-Jan Baken and Jan van der Linden, Third World Planning Review , 16, pp.451-466.
26.
Marcuse, P. (2001) The liberal/conservative divide in the history of housing policy in the United States, Housing Studies, 16, pp. 717-736.
27.
Mayo, S., Malpezzi, S. and Cross, D. (1986) Shelter strategies for the urban poor in developing countries, World Bank Research Observer, 2, pp. 183-203.
28.
Mehta, M. and Mehta, D. (1989) Metropolitan Housing Market: A Study of Ahmedabad . New Delhi: Sage.
29.
Mohan, R. (1994) Understanding the Developing Metropolis: Lessons from the City Study of Bogota and Cali, Colombia. New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
Mukhija, V. (2001) Enabling slum redevelopment in Mumbai: policy paradox in practice, Housing Studies, 16, pp. 791-806.
31.
Payne, G. (1982) Self-help housing: a critique of the gecekondus of Ankara, in: P. Ward (Ed.) Self-help Housing: A Critique, pp. 117-140. London: Mansell Publishing Company.
32.
Payne, G. (Ed.) (1999) Making Common Ground: Public-Private Partnerships in Land for Housing. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
33.
Peattie, L. (1987) An idea in good currency and how it grew: the informal sector, World Development, 15, pp. 851-860.
34.
Perlman, J. (1976) The Myth of Marginality: Urban Poverty and Politics in Rio de Janiero. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
35.
Pugh, C. (1994) The idea of enablement in housing sector development: the political economy of housing for developing countries, Cities, 11, pp.357-371.
36.
Pugh, C. (1997) International urban and housing policy: a review of the 'Cambridge Studies', 1989-95, Environment and Planning A, 29, pp. 149-167.
37.
Quigley, J. (1999) Why should the government play a role in housing ?, Housing, Theory and Society, 16, pp. 201-203.
38.
Sanyal, B. (1996) Intention and outcome: formalization and its consequences , Regional Development Dialogue, 17, pp. 161-178.
39.
Siddiqui, T. and Khan, M. (1994) The Incremental Development Scheme, Third World Planning Review, 16, pp. 277-291.
40.
Siembieda, W. and Moreno, E. (1997) Expanding housing choices for the sector popular: strategies for Mexico, Housing Policy Debate, 8, pp.651-677.
41.
Strassman, P. (1994) Oversimplification in housing analysis, Cities, 11, pp. 377-383.
42.
Times of India (1999) Urban Land Ceiling Act repealed, Times of India, 12 January.
43.
Turner, J. (1972) Housing as a verb, in: J. Turner and R. Fichter (Eds) Freedom to Build: Dweller Control of the Housing Process, pp. 148-175. New York: The Macmillan Company.
44.
Turner, J. (1977) Housing by People: Towards Autonomy in Building Environments. New York: Pantheon Books.
45.
Unchs (1990) Global Strategy for Shelter to the Year 2000. Nairobi: UNCHS.
46.
Unchs (1996) The Istanbul Declaration and Habitat II Agenda. Istanbul: UNCHS.
47.
Usaid (1991) India: Private/Public Partnership in Land Development. Washington, DC: USAID.
48.
Wadhva, K. (1986) Role of private sector in urban housing markets: a case study of Ahmedabad, Nagarlok, 18(3), pp. 61-83.
49.
Wadhva, K. (1987) Housing the urban poor: what can the private sector do?, Urban India, 7(2), pp. 89-101.
50.
Wadhva, K. (1989) Role of Private Sector in Urban Housing: Case Study of Ahmedabad. New Delhi: Human Settlement Management Institute.
51.
World Bank (1991) Urban Policy and Economic Development: An Agenda for the 1990s. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
52.
World Bank (1993) Housing: Enabling Markets to Work, A World Bank Policy Paper. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
53.
World Bank (2000) Entering the 21st Century, World Development Report 1999-2000. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
54.
Zearley, T. (1993) Creating an enabling environment for housing: recent reforms in Mexico, Housing Policy Debate, 4, pp. 239-249.
