The efficacy of the urban regime and growth machine concepts beyond the US remains a matter of considerable debate. Some argue that these frameworks retain considerable value so long as they are 'properly' applied and that recent concerns about the limits to these frameworks result from no more than their 'misapplication'. I critically examine this argument through a review of recent work on the mobilisation of business interests in British cities. The central claim is that, even when focused on the 'right' issues and questions, US frameworks quickly exhaust their explanatory capacity. In the context of a widening diversity of alternative approaches, I suggest that it is time to move squarely beyond growth coalition and regime accounts. The paper makes a number of suggestions for ways in which this new phase of theory building might proceed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Austin, J. and McCaffrey, A. (2002) Business leadership coalitions and public private partnerships in American cities: a business perspective on regime theory, Journal of Urban Affairs, 24, pp. 35-54.
2.
Axford, N. and Pinch, S. (1994) Growth coalitions and local economic development strategy in southern England, Political Geography, 13, pp. 344-360.
3.
Bassett, K. (1990) Labour in the Sunbelt: the politics of local economic development strategy in an "M4-Corridor" town, Political Geography Quarterly, 9, pp. 67-83.
4.
Bassett, K. (1996) Partnerships, business elites and urban politics: new forms of governance in an English city?, UrbanStudies , 33, pp. 539-555.
5.
Bassett, K. (1999) Growth coalitions in Britain's waning Sunbelt: some reflections, in: A. Jonas and D. Wilson (Eds) The Urban Growth Machine, pp. 177-193. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
6.
Bassett, K. and Harloe, M. (1990) Swindon: the rise and decline of a growth coalition , in: M. Harloe, C. Pickvance and J. Urry (Eds) Place, Policy and Politics, pp. 42-61. London: Unwin Hyman.
7.
Bassett, K., Griffiths, R. and Smith, I. (2002) Testing governance: partnerships, planning and conflict in waterfront regeneration, UrbanStudies, 39, pp. 1757-1775.
8.
Boyle, M. (2000) Euro-regionalism and struggles over the scales of governance: the politics of Ireland's regionalisation approach to Structural Fund allocations 2000-2006, Political Geography, 19, pp. 737-769.
9.
Boyle, R. (1993) Changing partners: the experience of urban economic policy in west central Scotland, 1980-90, Urban Studies, 30, pp. 309-323.
10.
Brenner, N. (1999) Globalisation as reterritorialisation: the re-scaling of urban governance in the European Union, UrbanStudies, 36, pp. 431-451.
11.
Cbi (Confederation Of British Industry) (2001 ) RDAs: Getting Down to Business. London : CBI.
12.
Cooke, P. (1988) Municipal enterprise, growth coalitions and social justice, Local Economy, 3, pp. 1319-1336.
13.
Cox, K. (1998) Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: looking for local politics, Political Geography, 17, pp. 1-23.
14.
Cox, K. and Mair, A. (1988) Locality and community in the politics of local economic development, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 78, pp. 307-325.
15.
Cox, K. and Mair, A. (1989) Urban growth machines and the politics of local economic development, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 13, pp. 137-146.
16.
Davies, J. (2003) Partnerships versus regimes: why regime theory cannot explain urban Coalitions in the UK, Journal of Urban Affairs, 25, pp.253-269.
17.
Digaetano, A. and Klemanski, J. (1993a) Urban regime capacity: a comparison of Birmingham, England and Detroit, Michigan, Journal of Urban Affairs, 13, pp. 367-384.
18.
Digaetano, A. and Klemanski, J. (1993b) Urban regimes in comparative perspective: the politics of urban development in Britain, Urban Affairs Quarterly , 29, pp. 54-83.
19.
Digaetano, A. and Lawless, P. (1999) Urban governance and industrial decline-governing structures and policy agendas in Birmingham and Sheffield, England, and Detroit, Michigan, 1980-1997, Urban Affairs Review, 34, pp. 546-577.
20.
Digaetano, A. and Strom, E. (2003) Comparative urban governance: an integrated approach , Urban Affairs Review, 38, pp. 356-395.
21.
Dowding, K. (2001) Explaining urban regimes, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25, pp. 7-19.
22.
Dowding, K., Dunleavy, P., King, D. ET AL. (1995) Rational choice and community power structures , Political Studies, 43, pp. 265-277.
23.
Dowding, K., Dunleavy, P., King, D. ET AL. (1999) Regime politics in London local government , Urban Affairs Review, 34, pp. 515-545.
24.
Dowding, K., Dunleavy, P., King, D. ET AL. (2000) Understanding urban governance: the contribution of rational choice, in: G. Stoker (Ed.) The New Politics of British Governance, pp. 91-116. Basingstoke : Macmillan Press.
25.
Elkin, S. (1987) City and Regime in the American Republic. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
26.
Harding, A. (1991) The rise of urban growth coalitions, UK-style? , Environment and PlanningC, 9, pp. 295-317.
27.
Harding, A. (1994) Urban regimes and growth machines: towards a cross-national research agenda, Urban Affairs Quarterly, 29, pp. 356-382.
28.
Harding, A. (1999) North American urban political economy, urban theory and British research, British Journal of Political Science , 29, pp. 673-698.
29.
Harding, A., Wilks-Heeg, S. and Hutchins, M. (2000) Business, governance and the business of urban governance, UrbanStudies, 37, pp.975-994.
30.
Hay, C. and Jessop, B. (1995) The governance of local economic development and the development of local economic governance: a strategic relational approach . Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
31.
Hay, C. and Richards, D. (2000) The tangled webs of Westminster and Whitehall: the discourse, strategy and practice of networking within the British core executive, Public Administration, 78, pp. 1-28.
32.
Imrie, R., Pinch, S. and Boyle, M. (1996) Identities, citizenship and power in the cities, UrbanStudies, 33, pp. 1255-1262.
33.
Jessop, B. (2001) Institutional (re)turns and the strategic-relational approach, Environment and Planning A, 33, pp. 1213-1235.
34.
Jessop, B., Peck, J. and Tickell, A. (1999) Retooling the machine: economic crisis, state restructuring and urban politics, in: A. Jonas and D. Wilson (Eds) The Urban Growth Machine, pp. 141-159. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
35.
Jones, M. (1997) Spatial selectivity of the state? The regulationist enigma and local struggles over economic governance, Environment and Planning A, 29, pp. 831-864.
36.
Jones, M. (2001) The rise of the regional state in economic governance: 'partnerships for prosperity' or new scales of state power, Environment and Planning A, 33, pp. 1185-1211.
37.
Jones, M. and Ward, K. (1998) Grabbing grants? The role of coalitions in urban economic development, Local Economy, 13, pp. 28-38.
Lawless, P. (1994) Partnerships in urban regeneration in the UK: the Sheffield Central Area Study, UrbanStudies, 31, pp. 1303-1324.
40.
Lloyd, G. and Newlands, D. (1988) The 'growth coalition' and urban economic development , Local Economy, 3, pp. 31-39.
41.
Logan, J. and Molotch, H. (1987) Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
42.
Lowndes, V., Nanton, P., McCabe, A. and Skelcher, C. (1997) Networks, partnership and urban regeneration, Local Economy, 11, pp. 333-342.
43.
MacKinnon, D. (2000) Managerialism, governmentality and the state: a neo-Foucauldian approach to local economic governance, Political Geography, 19, pp. 293-314.
44.
MacLeod, G. (2001) Beyond soft institutional-ism: accumulation, regulation and their geographical fixes, Environment and Planning A, 33, pp. 1145-1167.
45.
MacLeod, G. and Goodwin, M. (1999) Space, scale and state strategy: rethinking urban and regional governance, Progress in Human Geography, 23, pp. 503-527.
46.
McGuirk, P. (2000) Power and policy networks in urban governance: local government and property-led regeneration in Dublin, UrbanStudies, 37, pp. 651-672.
47.
McNeill, D. (2002) Embodying a Europe of the cities: geographies of mayoral leadership, Area, 33, pp. 353-359.
48.
Molotch, H. (1976) The city as a growth machine: toward a political economy of place, American Journal of Sociology, 82, pp. 309-332.
49.
Mossberger, K. and Stoker, G. (2001) The evolution of urban regime theory: the challenge of conceptualization, Urban Affairs Review, 36, pp. 810-835.
50.
North, P., Valler, D. and Wood, A. (2001) Talking business: an actor-centred analysis of business agendas for local economic development, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25, pp. 830-846.
51.
Peck, J. (1995) Moving and shaking: business elites, state localism and urban privatism, Progress in Human Geography, 19, pp. 16-46.
52.
Peck, J. and Tickell, A. (1992) Local modes of social regulation? Regulation theory, Thatcherism and uneven development, Geoforum, 23, pp. 347-363.
53.
Peck, J. and Tickell, A. (1995) Business goes local: dissecting the 'business agenda ' in Manchester, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 19, pp. 55-78.
54.
Pincetl, S. (1999) The politics of influence: democracy and the growth machine in Orange County, US, in: A. JoNAs and D. Wilson (Eds) The Urban Growth Machine, pp. 195-211. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
55.
Raco, M. (2003a) Governmentality, subject-building, and the discourses and practices of devolution in the UK, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28, pp. 75-95.
56.
Raco, M. (2003b) The social relations of business representation and devolved governance in the United Kingdom, Environment and Planning A, 35, pp. 1853-1876.
57.
Raco, M. and Imrie, R. (2000) Governmentality and rights and responsibilities in urban policy, Environment and Planning A, 32, pp. 2187-2204.
58.
Rogerson, R. and Boyle, M. (1998) Glasgow's reluctant mavericks and inward investment strategy: local dependence and its applications, Scottish Geographical Magazine, 114, pp. 109-119.
59.
Rogerson, R. and Boyle, M. (2000) Property, politics and the neo-liberal revolution in urban Scotland, Progress in Planning, 54, pp. 133-196.
60.
Stew Art, M. (1996) Too little, too late: the politics of local complacency , Journal of Urban Affairs, 18, pp. 119-137.
61.
Stoker, G. (1995) Regime theory and urban politics, in: D. Judge, G. Stoker and H. Wolman (Eds) Theories of Urban Politics, pp. 54-71. London: Sage.
62.
Stoker, G. and Mossberger, K. (1994) Urban regime theory in comparative perspective , Environment and Planning C, 12, pp. 195-212. Stone, C. (1989) Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence, KA: University Press of Kansas .
63.
Urban Studies (1999) Special Issue: Discourse and Urban Change, 36(1).
64.
Valler, D. (1996) Locality, local economic strategy and private sector involvement: case studies in Norwich and Cardiff, Political Geography, 15, pp. 383-403.
65.
Valler, D. and Wood, A. (2004) Devolution and the politics of business representation: a strategic-relational approach, Environment and Planning A, 24 (in press).
66.
Valler, D., Wood, A. and North, P. (2000) Local governance and local business interests: a critical review, Progress in Human Geography, 24, pp. 409-428.
67.
Ward, K. (1996) Rereading urban regime theory: a sympathetic critique , Geoforum, 27, pp. 427-438.
68.
Ward, K. (2000) From rentiers to 'rantiers': 'active entrepreneurs', 'structural speculators' and the politics of marketing the city, UrbanStudies, 37, pp. 1093-1107.
69.
Ward, K. (2004) Challenging the machine from within: urban entrepreneurialism and representations of the city, in: A. Wood and D. Valler (Eds) Governing Local and Regional Economies, pp. 277-300. Aldershot: Ashgate.
70.
Wood, A. (1996) Analysing the politics of local economic development: making sense of cross-national convergence, Urban Studies , 33, pp.1281-1295.
71.
Wood, A., Valler, D. and North, P. (1998) Local business representation and the private sector role in local economic policy in Britain, Local Economy, 13, pp. 10-27.
