This article analyses what it takes for a new discourse to acquire formative power all the way from the formulation of ideas to the institutionalisation of new practices. Starting from seemingly contradictory propositions in the literature on housing and environmental policy discourses, and combining these with a contextual rational action approach, the empirical analysis traces the fate of the new sustainable development discourse introduced across many policy sectors in Sweden after 1996, including housing. It is found that who introduces new discursive ideas is important for their formative power; discourse introductions by government induce shifts in thoughts and talk across sectors. How this is done is even more important; metaphors and story lines of already institutionalised discourses strengthen formative power. Furthermore, using distributive measures with some strings attached is found to be an effective use of power resources to gain institutionalisation of the new discourse. However, it is found that institutionalised discourses at the local implementing level provide hindrances to formative power reaching all the way to new practices. This is furthermore accentuated by inherent contradictions in the Swedish discourse, as it built on equalising sustainable development with ecological modernisation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Auditors Of Parliament (Riksdagens Revi-Sorer) ( 1998/99) Statligt stöd till lokala investeringsprogram för en ekologiskt hållbar utveckling [State grants to local investment programmes for ecologically sustainable development]. Stockholm: Swedish Parliamentary Record.
2.
Bennett, A. (1999) Causal inference in case studies: from Mill's methods to causal mechanisms. Paper presented at the APSA Conference, Atlanta, Georgia ( http://www.georgetown.edu/bennett/APSA99.html).
3.
Brundin, P. and Eckerberg, K. (1999) Svenska kommuners arbete med Agenda 21. En enkätundersökning [A survey on Swedish municipalities and Agenda 21]. Stockholm : Kommunforbundet.
4.
Cabinet Bill (19961997:150) 1997 års ekonomiska vårproposition Utgiftsområde 18 [1997 Spring Economic Bill 1998. Spending Area 18]. Swedish Parliamentary Record .
5.
Cabinet Bill (1997/98/:1) Statsbudgeten, Utgiftsområde 18 [State Budget, Spending Area 18]. Swedish Parliamentary Record.
6.
Cabinet Communication (2001/02/:50) Hållbara Sverige—uppföljning av åtgärder fören ekologiskt hållbar utveckling [Sustainable Sweden-a follow-up of measures for an ecologically sustainable development]. Stockholm: Government Offices.
7.
Dahlberg, M. and Johansson, E. (2002) On the vote purchasing power of incumbent governments , American Political Science Review, 96, pp. 27-40.
8.
DESD (Delegationen for Ekologiskt Hallbar Utveckling—Delegation for an ecologically sustainable development) (1997a) Ett hallbart Sverige [A sustainable Sweden]. Swedish Parliamentary Record.
9.
Desd (1997b) Lokala investeringsprogramkommunerna som motor i den ekologiska omställningen av samhället [LIPs-the municipalities as driving forces in the ecological transformation of society]. Ministry of Environment, Stockholm, June.
10.
Eckerberg, K. (1999) Sweden: combining municipal and national efforts for quick progress, in: W. M. Lafferty (Ed.) Implementing LA 21 in Europe, pp. 13-26. Oslo: ProSus.
11.
Göteborgs-Posten (2003) Fortfarande gron visionär—men Persson medger att han inte gatt fran ord till handling [Still a green visionary-but Persson admits not matching his words with deeds] , 5 August.
12.
Hajer, M.A. (1995) The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernisation and the Policy Process. Oxford: Clarendon.
13.
Hanberger, A. ET AL. (2002) LokaLa investeringsprogram-en förstudie inför utvärderingen [Local investment programmes-a pre-evaluation]. Report No. 10, Umea Centre for Evaluation Research.
14.
Jansen, A.-I., Osland, O. and Hanf, K. (1998) Environmental challenges and institutional changes: an interpretation of the development of environmental policy in western Europe , in: K. Hanf and A.-I. Jansen (Eds) Governance and Environmental Quality. Environmental Administration, Policy and Politics in Western Europe , pp. 277-325. London: Longman.
15.
Kågesson, P. and Lidmark, A.-M. (1998) Konsten att använda 5,4 miljarder: En kritisk granskning av stödet till de lokala investeringsprogrammen för hållbar utveckling [The art of spending 5.4 billions: a critical assessment of state grants to local investment programmes for sustainable development]. Report 9423/98, Swedish Society forNature Conservation, Stockholm .
16.
Korpi, W. (2001) Contentious institutions: an augmented rational-action analysis of the origins and path dependency of welfare state institutions in western countries, Rationality and Society, 13, pp. 235283.
17.
Lafferty, W.M. (2004) Introduction: aligning form and function in governance for sustainable development, in: W. M. Lafferty (Ed.) Governance for Sustainable Development: The Challenge of Adapting Form to Function, ch. 1. London: Edward Elgar (forthcoming).
18.
Langhelle, O. (2000) Why ecological modernisation and sustainable development should not be conflated, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 2, pp. 303-322.
19.
Larsson, K. (1999) Sa bygger vi det grona folkhemmet [This is how we build the green People's Home], Svenska Dagbladet, 12 May.
20.
Lindh, A. (1997) Morgondagens miljöpoliti— en väg till nya möjligheter [Tomorrow's environmental policy-a road to new possibilities] . Speech delivered 29 January.
21.
Lundqvist, L.J. (1987) Housing Policy and Tenures in Sweden: The Quest for Neutrality. Aldershot: Avebury .
22.
Lundqvist, L.J. (1992) Tenure and property: the power dimension of welfare state involvement in Nordic housing, in: L. J. Lundqvist (Ed.) Policy, Organization, Tenure. A Comparative History of Housing in Small Welfare States, pp. 121-136. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
23.
Lundqvist, L.J. (2000) Capacity-building or social construction? explaining Sweden's shift towards ecological modernisation, GeoForum , 31, pp. 21-32.
24.
Lundqvist, L.J. (2004) Straddling the Fence: Sweden and Ecological Governance . Manchester: Manchester University Press.
25.
Ministry Of Environment (1998a) Gröna jobb. MiLjo-, närings- och arbetsmarknadspolitik i samverkan [Green jobs: environmental, industrial, and labour market policies in co-operation] . Miljodepartementet DS1998:13, Stockholm.
26.
Ministry Of Environment (1998b) 42 kommuner—så här används statsbidraget till lokala investeringsprogram 1998 [42 municipalities-the use of state grants to local investment programmes 1998]. Stockholm: Ministry of the Environment.
27.
Ministry Of Environment (1999) Hållbara kommuner—så här används statsbidraget till lokala investeringsprogram 1999 [Sustainable municipalities-the use of state grants to local investment programmes 1999]. Stockholm: Ministry of the Environment.
28.
Ministry Of Environment (2000a) Bidrag till lokala investeringsprogram, 1998-1999, fördelade på huvud- och underkategorier [Grants to LIPs, according to main and sub-categories]. Stockholm: Ministry of Environment, Hallbara Sverige .
29.
Ministry Of Environment (2000b) Cabinet decision on prolongation of Navestad project. Ministry of Environment, Stockholm2000-05-25.
30.
Murphy J. and Gouldson, A. (2000) Environmental policy and industrial innovation: integrating environment and economy through ecological modernisation, GeoForum, 31, pp. 33-44
31.
National Audit Office (1999:37) De lokala investeringsprogrammen i praktiken-en uppföljning av kommunernas arbete [The Local Investment Programmes in Practice-A Follow-up of Municipal Activities]. Stockholm: Riksrevisionsverket .
32.
Norrkopings Kommun (2000) Letters and reports to the Ministry of Environment on the Navestad project. 2000-02-28, 2000-05-22. Norrkopings kommun.
33.
Persson, G. (1997) Sa gor vi Sverige till ett foregangsland for ekologisk hallbarhet! [This is how we make Sweden a forerunner in ecologically sustainable development!]Speech delivered at SSU:s och Byggnads Environmental Seminar, April (up to 1999 available at http://www.sb.gov.se_info.rosenbad).
34.
Sandstedt, E. (1999) Fran social valfard till hallbar välfärd—ett diskursivt systemskifte? [From social to sustainable welfare-a discursive systemic shift?], in: Boinstitutets årsbok 1999: Systemskifte i bostadspolitiken, pp. 54-87. Gävle: Boinstitutet.
35.
Sfs (Swedish Code Of Statutes) (1998:23) Statliga bidrag till lokala investeringsprogram som ökar den ekologiska hållbarheten i samhället [State grants to local investment programmes for sustainable development] . Stockholm: Ministry of Environment .
36.
Somerville, P. and Bengtsson, B. (2002) Constructionism, realism, and housing theory, Housing, Theory and Society, 19, pp. 121-136.
37.
SOU (1997: 105) Agenda 21 i Sverige: Fem ar efter Rio, resultat och framtid [Agenda 21 in Sweden: five years after Rio, results and future]. Stockholm: Ministry of Environment.
38.
Standing Committee on Housing [Bostadssutskottet] (1998/99) Statens stöd till lokala investeringsprogram för hållbar utveckling— uppföljning av den hittillsvarande fördelningen av ramanslaget El under statsbudgetens utgiftsområde 18 [State grants to local investment programmes for sustainable develoment-a review of allocated grants] . Stockholm: Swedish Parliamentary Record.
39.
Svenska Dagbladet (1998) Oklar fordelning av miljomiljarder [Unclear allocation of environmental billions] , 23 December.
40.
Swedish Parliamentary Record (1996- 2000) Floor debates.
41.
Tilton, T. (1990) The Political Theory of Swedish Social Democracy: Through the Welfare State to Socialism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
