As part of the post-Soviet transition of civil law and economic relations, cities of the Russian Federation have sought to reform the system of urban land use and development regulation. Based on changes in the laws on urban development and the Land Code, the reforms have followed two approaches. Some cities have adopted the system of 'zoning' to create pre-defined land uses and parameters of development which apply uniformly to all land parcels in each urban zone. Other cities have retained the system of 'site-specific' definition of uses and development parameters. It appears that the 'zoning' system is more responsive to the new conditions in which private individuals, enterprises and institutions initiate development projects and provide capital funding, in response to market conditions. This can be shown by looking at the process of project development in the city of Novgorod (the Great), where Novgorod's reforms appear to offer to developers/investors an enhanced legal position, a lower level of risk and simpler and more cost-effective methods of acquiring land and development permits. This favourable situation appears to have made the city one of the most attractive locations for private investment in the Russian Federation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Afanasayeva, T., Trutnev, E. and Yakubovitch, E. (1996) Gradostroitelnoe Zakonodatelstvo Rossi i na Puti Reform [Urban Development Laws of Russia in the Course of Reform]. Moscow: International Institute for Developing a Legal Economy.
2.
Bazevsky, O. (1999) Strategia Gradostroitelnogo Rozvita Moskvi v 21e Veke [Strategy for urban development growth in Moscow in the 21st Century] , Architektura Stroitelstvo Design, [Journal of the International Association of Architectural Unions], pp. 18-33.
3.
Bertaud, A. and Renaud, B. (1995) Cities without land markets: location and land use in the socialist city. Policy Research Working Papers, World Bank, Washington, DC (www.worldbank.org).
4.
Berzon, N. (2001) Formirovanie Investitsionogo Klimata v Ekonomiki , Voprosi Ekonomiki, 7, pp.104-114.
5.
Bogoliubov, C. (2000) Pravovoi Regime Zemel Pocelleni [Legal Regime of Urban Settlements], Zemelnoe Pravo, Uchebnik dla Byzov, pp. 260-273. Moscow: Norma.
6.
Desoto, H. (2000) The Mystery of Capital. New York: Basic Books.
7.
Folomiev, A. and Revazov, V. (1999) Investitsionii Kilmat Regionov Rossii ii Puti Ego Ulushenia, Voprosi Ekonomiki, 9, pp. 57-61.
8.
Foreign Investment Advisory Service (2001) Administrative Barriers to Investment within the Subjects of the Russian Federation . Washington, DC: International Finance Corporation and World Bank.
9.
Institute Of Urban Economics (1999) MOSCOW Town-planning Regulation System, Annual Report ( www.urbaneconomics.ru).
10.
Institute Of Urban Economics (2000) Drafting of the Moscow Programme of Economic Development, Annual Report (www.urbaneconomics.ru).
11.
KAssides, C. (2000) Cities in Transition: A Strategic View of Urban and Local Government Issues. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development ( www.worldbank.org).
12.
Miller, M.R., Hart, P. and Butler, S. (1998) Novgorod Regional Investment Initiative: Land and Real Estate Reform Sector. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
13.
Novgorod City (1996) Pravila Zemlepolzovania ii Zastroiki v Novgorode [Regulations on Land Use and Development] . Decree of the City Duma, No. 36, 19 December (www.admin.nov.ru).
14.
Novgorod City (1998) Regulations on Urban Development Activity on the Territory of the City. Decree of the City Duma, No. 447, 24 September (www.admin.nov.ru).
15.
Novgorod City (2002) Investment Strategy: Veliki Novgorod for Investors. Administration of the City of Novgorod (www.novgorod-invest.ru).
16.
Novgorod City (2003) Decree On the Commission on Land Use and Development, Decree of the City Duma, No. 201, 24 July ( www.admin.nov.ru).
17.
Novgorod Oblast Administration (2002) Konceptsia Socialno-eknonicheskogo Rozvitia Oblasti na 2003 Goda. Decree of the Oblast Duma, No. 99-03, 19 December.
18.
Petro, N. (1999) The Novgorod region: a Russian success story, Post-Soviet Affairs, 15, pp. 235-261.
19.
Pilyasov, A. (2003) Politicheskie ii Ekonomicheskie Faktori Rozvitia Rossiiskikh Regionov, Voprosi Ekonomiki, 5 pp. 67-75.
20.
Solanko, L. and Tekomieni, M. (2002) A tale of two cities, Novgorod and Pskov in the 1990's. Discussion Paper No. 6, Bank of Finland Institute , Helsinki (www.bof.fi/bofit).
21.
Tkachenko, L. (1999) Novi Generalni Plan Rozvitia Moskvi, v Ryady Strategicheskikh Dokymentov Gradostroitelnogo Rozvitia Krupneshikh Gorodov Mira [The New General Plan of Moscow Compared with the Strategic Documents of Urban Development of the Great Cities of the World], Architektura Stroitelstvo Design [Journal of the International Association of Architectural Unions] , 14, pp. 79-81.
22.
Trutnev, E.K. (1998) Deistvuyoshi Poryadok Predstavlennia Zemelnikh Uchastokh Cherez Prizm Architekturno-Planirovochnikh Zadannia (APZ) [Contemporary Procedures for Allocating Land Parcels through the Prism of the Architectural-Planning Order] (www.UDRF.ru).
23.
Trutnev, E. K. (Ed.) (2002) Pravovoe Zonirovanie Goroda, Vvedenie v Problemi Gradoregulirovania v Rinochnikh Ysloviakh. Moscow: Institute of Urban Economics.
24.
Valletta, W. and Visikovsky, A. (1999) Pravovoe Zonirovannie [Legal Zoning]. Moscow: Urban Development Reform Foundation and Eurasia Foundation (www.UDRF.ru).
25.
Vasilev, N. (2001) Regulirovannie Gradostroitelnii Deyatelnosti [Regulating urban development activity], Design ii Novaya Architektura [Journal of Kazan Society of Architects], 8, pp.78-81.
26.
Visikovsky, A., Abalkina, I. and Abalkina, T. (1999) Pravila Zemlepolzovanie ii Zastroiki: Strategia Vvedenie v Deistve [Regulations for land use and development: a strategy for introduction and implementation], Gorodskoe Upravlennia, 2 (www.UDRF.ru).
27.
Yosin, G., (1999) Konceptsia Razrobotki Gradostroitelnogo Zakonodatelstva Moskvi [Concept of Elaborating the Urban Development Legislation of Moscow] , Architektura Stroitelstvo Design, [Journal of the International Association of Architects], pp. 4-33.
