In this paper, an assessment is made of the extent to which proximity to 38 dispersed public housing sites opening in Denver during 1992-95 affected post-development levels and trends in neighbourhood crime rates. A new econometric specification incorporating pre- and post-controls for selection bias as well as spatial autocorrelation was employed to test for statistical relationships between the development of dispersed public housing sites and subsequent increases in various types of crime. The findings suggest that proximity to dispersed public housing was not associated with any post-development increase in reported crime of any type.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anselin, L. (1992) Spacestat Tutorial: A Work-book for Using Spacestat in the Analysis of Spatial Data. Technical Software Series S-92-1, University of California, Santa Barbara: NC-GIA .
2.
Bailey, T. and Gatrell, A. (1995) Interactive Spatial Data Analysis. Harlow: Longman Scientific and Technical.
3.
Brill, W. and Associates (1975) Victimization, Fear of Crime, and Altered Behavior: A Profile of the Crime Problem in Four Housing Projects in Boston. Washington, DC: US Department of Housing and Urban Development .
4.
Brill, W. and Associates (1976) Victimization, Fear of Crime, and Altered Behavior: A Profile of the Crime Problem in William Nickerson Jr. Gardens, Los Angeles, California. Washington, DC: US Department of Housing and Urban Development.
5.
Brill, W. and Associates (1977a) Victimization, Fear of Crime, and Altered Behavior: A Profile of the Crime Problem in Capper Dwellings, Washington, DC.Washington, DC: US Department of Housing and Urban Development.
6.
Brill, W. and Associates (1977b) Victimization, Fear of Crime, and Altered Behavior: A Profile of the Crime Problem in Murphy Homes, Baltimore, Maryland. Washington, DC: US Department of Housing and Urban Development.
7.
Brill, W. and Associates (1977c) Victimization, Fear of Crime, and Altered Behavior: A Profile of the Crime Problem in Scott/Carver Homes, Dade County, Florida. Washington, DC: US Department of Housing and Urban Development .
8.
Cook, J. (1997) Neighbors' perceptions of group homes, Community Mental Health Journal, 33, pp. 287-299.
9.
Dear, M. (1992) Understanding and overcoming the NIMBY syndrome , Journal of the American Planning Association, 58, pp. 288-300.
10.
Dear, M., Takahashi, L. and Wilton, R. (1996) Factors Influencing Community Acceptance: Summary of the Evidence. Washington, DC: Campaign for New Community Resource Document Series.
11.
De Frances, C. and Smith, S. (1998) Perceptions of Neighborhood Crime, 1995. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report.
12.
De Keseredy, W.S., Schwartz, M.D., Alvi, S. and Tamaszewski, E.A. (2002) Perceived collective efficacy and women's victimization in public housing. Unpublished manuscript.
13.
Dunworth, T. and Saiger, A. (1994) Drugs and Crime in Public Housing: A Three City Analysis. Santa Monica, CA: Rand .
14.
Du Rant, R., Getts, A., Cadenhead, C. and Woods, E. (1995) The association between weapon-carrying and the use of violence among adolescents living in or around public housing, Journal of Adolescence, 18, pp. 579-592.
15.
Farley, J. (1982) Has public housing gotten a bad rap? The incidence of crime in St. Louis public housing developments, Environment & Behavior, 14, pp. 443-477.
16.
Freeman, L. and Botein, H. (2002) Subsidized housing and neighborhood impacts: a theoretical discussion and review of the evidence, Journal of Planning Literature, 16, pp. 359-378.
17.
Freudenberg, W. and Pastor, S. (1992) NIM-BYs and LULUs: stalking the syndrome, Journal of Social Issues, 48, pp. 39-61.
18.
Galster, G., Tatian, P. and Smith, R. (1999) The impact of neighbors who use section 8 certificates on property values, Housing Policy Debate, 10, pp. 879-917.
19.
Galster, G., Pettit, K., Santiago, A. and Tatian, P. (2002) The impact of supportive housing on neighborhood crime rates, Journal of Urban Affairs, 24, pp. 289-315.
20.
Galster, G., Santiago, A., Tatian, P., Pettit, K. and Smith, R. (2003) Why Not In My Back Yard? Neighborhood Impacts of Assisted Housing. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research Press, Rutgers University .
21.
Galster, G., Tatian, P., Santiago, A. and Smith, R. (1999) Assessing the Property Value Impacts of Housing Subsidy Programs. Washington, DC: US Department of Housing and Urban Development.
22.
Garbarino, J., Kostelny, K. and Dubrow, N. (1991) No Place to Be a Child. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
23.
Goetz, E., Lam, H. and Heitlinger, A. (1996) There Goes the Neighborhood? The Impact of Subsidized Multi-Family Housing on Urban Neighborhoods. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Urban and Regional Affairs, University of Minnesota.
24.
Gould, M. and O'Brien, T. (1997) Neighborhood Attitudes about the Placement of Services and Housing for Groups Protected by the Federal Fair Housing Act: Final Report of a Year-long Study Involving Focus Groups and a Survey of Neighborhood Residents . Denver, CO: Center for Human Investment Policy, University of Colorado-Denver.
25.
Grieson, R. and White, J. (1989) The existence and capitalization of neighborhood externalities, Journal of Urban Economics, 25, pp. 68-76.
26.
Griffith, D. (1987) Spatial Autocorrelation: A Primer. Washington, DC: American Association of Geographers .
27.
Guthathakurta, S. and Mushkatel, A. (2000) Does locational choice matter? A comparison of different subsidized housing programs in Phoenix, Arizona, Urban Affairs Review, 35, pp. 520-540.
28.
Hargreaves, B., Callanan, J. and Maskell, G. (1998) Does community housing reduce neighboarhood property values?Paper presented at AREUEA Annual Meeting , January, Chicago, IL.
29.
Harrell, A. and Gouvis, C. (1994) Predicting Neighborhood Risk of Crime. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
30.
Heumann, L. (1996) Assisted living in public housing? A case study of mixing frail elderly and younger persons with chronic mental illness and substance abuse histories, Housing Policy Debate, 7, pp. 447-472.
31.
Hogan, J. (1996) Scattered-site Housing: Characteristics and Consequences . Washington, DC: US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research .
32.
Holzman, H. (1996) Criminological research on public housing: toward a better understanding of people, places, and spaces, Crime and Delinquency, 42, pp. 361—378.
33.
Holzman, H., Hyatt, R. and Dempster, J. (2001) Patterns of aggravated assault in public housing , Violence Against Women, 7, pp. 662-684.
34.
Hsiao, C. (1986) Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press
35.
Intriligator, M. (1978) Econometric Models, Techniques, and Applications . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
36.
Kaufman, S. and Smith, J. (1999) Framing and reframing in land use change conflicts , Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 16, pp. 164-180.
37.
Kelling, G. and Coles, C. (1996) Fixing Broken Windows: Restoring Order and Reducing Crime in Our Communities. New York: Simon and Schuster.
38.
Keyes, L. (1992) Strategies and Saints: Fighting Drugs in Subsidized Housing. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
39.
Knox, G., Tromanhauser, E., Laskey, J. and Mccurrie, T. (1997) The gang problem in Chicago's public housing: a special report of the National Gang Crime Research Center, Journal of Gang Research, 4, pp. 49-65.
40.
Lake, R. (1993) Rethinking NIMBY, Journal of the American Planning Association, 59, pp. 87-93.
41.
Lyons, R. and Loverage, S. (1993) An hedonic estimation of the effect of federally subsidized housing on nearby residential property values. Staff Paper P93-6 , Deptartment of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Minnesota.
42.
McNulty, T. and Holloway, S. (2000) Race, crime, and public housing in Atlanta: testing a conditional effect hypothesis, Social Forces, 79, pp. 707-729.
43.
Morenoff, J., Sampson, R., and Raudenbush, S. (2001) Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence, Criminology, 39, pp. 517-559.
44.
National Law Center On Homelessness And Poverty ( 1997) Access Delayed, Access Denied. Washington, DC: National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty .
45.
Newman, O. (1972) Defensible Space. New York: The Macmillan Company.
46.
Pace, R., Barry, R. and Sirmans, C. (1998) Spatial statistics and real estate, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Business, 17, pp. 5-13.
47.
Pendall, R. (1999) Opposition to housing: NIMBY and beyond, Urban Affairs Review, 31, pp. 112-136.
48.
Petrila, J. (1994) An overview of judicial enforcement of the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988. Florida Mental Health Institute , University of South Florida website (< http://www.fmhi.usf.edu/institute/pubs/articles/fairjpp.html > ; accessed October 13, 1999).
49.
Popkin, S., Olson, L., Lurigio, A. ET AL. (1995) Sweeping out drugs and crime: residents' views of the Chicago Housing Authority's public housing drug elimination program , Crime and Delinquency, 41, pp. 73-99.
50.
Rocha, E. and Dear, M.1989. Gaining acceptance for community-based service facilities: an annotated bibliography. (Working Paper No. 25, Los Angeles Homeless Project) . Department of Geography, University of Southern California , Los Angeles.
51.
Rohe, W. and Burby, R. (1988) Fear of crime in public housing, Environment and Behavior, 20, pp.700-720.
52.
Roncek, D., Bell, R. and Francik, J. (1981) Housing projects and crime: testing a proximity hypothesis, Social Problems, 29, pp. 151-166.
53.
Sampson, R., Raudenbush, S., and Earls, F. (1997) Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy, Science, 277, pp. 918-924.
54.
Santiago, A. and Galster, G. (2001) Dispersing the second ghetto: feasibility study final report. Report to theFord Foundation.
55.
Santiago, A., Galster, G. and Tatian, P. (2001) Assessing the property value impacts of the dispersed housing subsidy program in Denver, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20, pp. 65-88.
56.
Takahashi, L. and Dear, M. (1997) The changing dynamics of community opposition to human service facilities, Journal of the American Planning Association, 63, pp. 79-93.
57.
Taylor, R. (2001) The ecology of crime, fear, and delinquency: social disorganization versus social efficacy, in: R. Paternoster and R. Bachman (Eds) Explaining Criminals and Crime, pp. 124-139. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Press.
58.
Vitaliano, D. (1983) Public housing and slums: cure or cause?, UrbanStudies, 20, pp. 173-183.
59.
Wahl, O. (1993) Community impact of group homes for mentally ill adults, Community Mental Health Journal, 29, pp. 247-259.
60.
Wilson, J. and Kelling, G. (1982) Broken windows, The Atlantic Monthly , 249, pp. 29-38.
