This article reports recent research that has assessed the achievements of one of the most extensive area-based initiatives (ABIs) that has ever been adopted in England-namely, the Single Regeneration Budget. This research has sought to ascertain whether, at least in relation to the findings from SRB, there is evidence that the ABI has delivered what was expected of it and thus whether the underlying rationale for its deployment was valid. The article focuses on three key areas of relevance to the attainment of local area regeneration. These are: targeting social deprivation; bringing about effective partnership working; and, `bending' the activities of mainstream service providers. This article concludes by considering what the lessons from SRB are for the future shape and form of ABIs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bramley, G., Evans, M. and Atkins, J. ET AL. (1998) Where does public spending go? Pilot study to analyse the flows of public expenditure to local areas. London: DETR.
2.
Brennan, A., Rhodes, J. and Tyler, P. (1997) EvaLuation of the Single Regeneration Budget: the evaluation framework. Discussion Paper 83, Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge.
3.
Brennan, A., Rhodes, J. and Tyler, P. (1998a) New findings on the nature of economic and social exclusion in England and the implications for new policy initiatives. Discussion Paper 101, Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge.
4.
Brennan, A., Rhodes, J. and Tyler, P. (1998b) The distribution of Single Regeneration Budget Challenge Fund expenditure in relation to local area needs in England. Discussion Paper 91, Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge.
5.
Brennan, A., Rhodes, J. and Tyler, P. (2000) The nature of local area social exclusion in England and the role of the labour market, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 16(1), pp. 129-146.
6.
Carley, M. (2001) Community regeneration and neighbourhood renewal: research review and key lessons. Edinburgh: Scottish Homes.
7.
Cea (Cambridge Economic Associates) (2001) National EvaLuation of the Former Regeneration Programmes. Central Research Unit, Scottish Executive, Edinburgh .
8.
Dabinett, G., Lawless, P., Rhodes, J. and Tyler, P. (2001) A review of the evidence base for regeneration and practice. London: DETR.
9.
Detr (Department Of The Environment, Transport And The Regions) (1997a) Education Initiatives and Regeneration Strategies: A Guide to Good Practice. London: DETR.
10.
Detr (1997b) Youth and Regeneration: Good Practice Guide. London: DETR .
11.
Detr (1998a) Sustainable Regeneration - Good Practice Guide. London: DETR.
12.
Detr (1998b) EvaLuation of the Single Regeneration Budget Challenge Fund: A Partnership for Regeneration: An Interim Evaluation. London: DETR.
13.
Detr (2000a) Indices of Deprivation 2000. London: DETR.
14.
Detr (2000b) Our Towns and Cities: The Future—Delivering an Urban Renaissance. London : DETR.
15.
Detr (2001) Local Strategic Partnerships: Government Guidance. London: DETR .
16.
Dfee (Department For Education And Emply-Ment) ( 1999) Learning Elements of the Single Regeneration Budget. Sudbury: DfEE Publications.
17.
DoE (Department Of The Environment) (1994) Assessing the Impact of Urban Policy. London: HMSO.
18.
DoE (1996a) Health and Regeneration . London: DoE.
19.
DoE (1996b) Ways into Work . London: DoE.
20.
DoE (1996c) Government Response to the Environment Committee First Report into the Single regeneration Budget. Cm 3178. London: HMSO.
21.
DoE (1997a) Effective Partnerships: A Handbook for Members of SRB Challenge Fund Partnerships. London: DoE.
22.
DoE (1997b) SRB Challenge Fund: A Handbook of Good Practice in Management Systems. London: DoE.
23.
Hall, S. and Mawson, J. (1999) Challenge Funding, Contracts and Area Regeneration: A Decade of Innovation in Policy Management and Coordination. Bristol: The Policy Press, in association with the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
24.
HMT (2000) Prudent for a Purpose: Building Opportunity and Security for All. London : HMT.
25.
Lawless, P. (1994), Partnership in urban regeneration in the United Kingdom: the Sheffield Central Area Study, UrbanStudies, 31, pp.1303-1324.
26.
Mawson, J., Beazley, M., Burfitt, A. ET AL. (1995) The Single Regeneration Budget: the stocktake . Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, University of Birmingham.
27.
Peck, J. and Tickell, A. (1994) Too many partners ... the future for regeneration partnerships, Local Economy, 9, pp. 251-265.
28.
Russell, H. (2001) Local Strategic Partnerships: Lessons from New Commitment to Regeneration. Bristol: The Policy Press, published for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
29.
Seu (SocIal Exclusion Unit) (2001) A New Commitment to Neighbourhood Renewal: National Strategy Action Plan. London: SEU.
30.
Smith, G. (1999) Area based initiatives: the rationale for and options for area targeting. CASE Paper 25, Centre for Analysis and Social Exclusion , London School of Economics.
31.
Tweeds (Eds) (1996) Laxton's Guide to Single Regeneration Budgets: SRB Challenge Funding. Oxford: Laxton's.
