'Globalisation' is only the most recent manifestation of convergence theory. This article shows how distinctive housing finance systems in the advanced economies contribute to distinctive housing systems with important social and economic implications. It also suggests that the evidence from the European Union confirms what can be derived from a priori reasoning: that mobility of finance does not alter the nationally based components of the wider housing finance system. Hence, even huge changes in the nature of intermediaries fail to alter the fundamental nature of the mortgage product. Combined with lack of any evidence to suggest that government support for home-ownership is in general or irreversible retreat, it is suggested that the former socialist 'transition' countries have considerably more opportunity to shape their housing finance systems than might be suggested by convergence theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bank Of Finland (2001) Annual Report 2000. Helsinki: Bank of Finland .
2.
Bank Of Finland (2002) Annual Report 2001. Helsinki: Bank of Finland .
3.
Beidl, R.A. (1999) The virtual mortgage bank: how technology is toppling traditional barriers. Research Note, TowerGroup, Needham, MA.
4.
Boelhouwer, P. (2002) Capital accumulation via homeownership: the case of the Netherlands, European Journal of Housing Policy, 2(2), pp. 167-181.
5.
Boléat. M. (1985) National Housing Finance Systems: A Comparative Study. London: Croom Helm.
6.
Donnison, D. and Ungerson, C. (1982) Housing Policy. Harmondsworth : Penguin.
7.
Driver, J. (1998) UK and European mortgage securitisation: trends and prospects, HousingFinance, 40, pp. 11-15.
8.
The Economist (2002) The roof that costs too much, 7-13 December, p. 58.
9.
The Financial Times (2000) The German Pfandbrief: report for investors 24 May, London edn.
10.
Glenn, D.W. (1999) Future trends in housing finance, Mortgage Banking, April, p. 37.
11.
Hardt, J. (2002) Recent Developments in European Mortgage Markets , in: Oecd (Ed.) Housing Finance in Transition Economies, pp. 161-174. Paris: OECD.
12.
Hegedüs, J., Mayo, S. and Tosics, I. (1996) Transition of the housing sector in the east central European countries, Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 8(2), pp. 101-136.
13.
Housing America Update (2000) 1(1).
14.
Kemeny, J. (1995) From Public Housing to the Social Market: Rental Policy in Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.
15.
Lea M. J., and Bernstein, S. (Eds) (1995) Housing Finance Sourcebook . London: International Union for Housing Finance.
16.
Lea, M.J., Welter, R. and Dübel, A. (1997) Study on Mortgage Credit in the European Economic Area, San Diego, CA, Potsdam and Bonn: European Commission, Directorate General XXIV and Empirica.
17.
Lomax, J. (1991) Housing finance: an international perspective, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, 31, pp. 56-64.
18.
Mabett, D. and Bolderson, H. (1999) Theories and methods in comparative social policy , in: J. Clasen (Ed.) Comparative Social Policy: Concepts, Theories and Methods, pp. 34-56. Oxford : Blackwell.
19.
Maclennan, D., Muellbauer, J. and Stephens, M. (2000) Asymmetries in Housing and Financial Market Institutions and EMU, in: T. Jfnkinson (Ed.) Readings in Macroeconomics, pp. 74-98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
McGuire, C. (1981) International Housing Policies: A Comparative Analysis . Toronto: Lexington Books.
21.
Memery, C. (2001) The Housing system and the Celtic tiger: the state response to a housing crisis of affordability and access, European Journal of Housing Policy, 1(1), pp. 79-104.
22.
Ministry Of The Environment (Ed.) (2002) Evaluation of Finnish Housing Finance and Support Systems: Common Report. Helsinki: Ministry of the Environment.
23.
Oecd (1998) Country Surveys-Japan . Paris: OECD.
24.
Oecd (Ed.) (2002) Housing Finance in Transition Economies. Paris: OECD.
25.
Pichler-Milanovich, N. (2001) Urban housing markets in central and eastern Europe: convergence, divergence or policy collapse, European Journal of Housing Policy, 1(2), pp. 145-187.
26.
Simmons, P. A. (Ed.) (1997) Housing Statistics of America. Lanham, MA: Bernan Press .
27.
Stephens, M. (2000) Convergence in European mortgage systems before and after EMU, Journal of Housing and theBuilt Environment , 15, pp. 29-52.
28.
Stephens, M. (2002a) International models of housing finance housing systems in western and transition economies, in: Oecd (Ed.) Housing Finance in Transition Economies, pp. 175-182. Paris: OECD.
29.
Stephens, M. (2002b) Housing market instability in Finland before and after EMU, in: Ministry of the Environment (Ed.) Evaluation of Finnish Housing Finance and Support Systems, pp. 141-154. Helsinki: Ministry of the Environment.
30.
Stephens, M., Burns, N. and Mackay, L. (2002) Social Market or Safety Net? British Social Rented Housing in a European Context. Bristol: Policy Press.
31.
Struyk, R.J. (2000) A regional policy report, in: R. A. Struyk (Ed.) Homeownership and Housing Finance Policy in the Former Soviet Bloc: Costly Populism, pp. 1-73. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
32.
Tiwari, P. and Moriizumi, Y. (2002) Government policies and home mortgage market in Japan. Paper presented to the European Network for Housing Research Conference, Vienna, July.
33.
Tosics, I. and Hegedüs, J. (1998) Centrally planned housing systems, in: W. Van Vleit (Ed.) The Encyclopaedia of Housing , pp. 42-44. London: Sage.
34.
Un Habitat (2001) Cities in a Globalizing World: Global Report on Human Settlements. London: Earthscan.
35.
VLErr, W. Van (Ed.) (1998) Encylopedia of Housing. London: Sage.
36.
Yates, J. (1997) Changing directions in Australian housing policies: the end of muddling through?, Housing Studies, 12(2), pp. 265-277.
