This article asks why nations subsidise their low-income housing sectors and offers five reasons: to improve public health; to reduce societal injustice; to preserve the social order; to increase equality of opportunity; and, to accommodate population growth. After discussing those reasons in some detail, they are used as a framework for exploring some salient questions about low-income housing policy in the US. It is suggested that the framework would also be useful for analysis of low-income housing policies in other countries. It is concluded that the largest low-income housing subsidy programme in the US—the Section 8 voucher programme-is inapt.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Apgar, W.C. (2001) Housing vouchers and production programs: an assessment of the GAO cost study. Joint Center for Housing Studies, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
2.
Bourassa, S.C. and Grigsby, W.G. (2000) Income tax concessions for owner-occupied housing , Housing Policy Debate, 11, pp. 521-546.
3.
Bradbury, K.L. and Downs, A. (1981) Conference discussion, in: K. L. Bradbury and A. Downs (Eds) Do Housing Allowances Work?, pp. 375-404. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
4.
Buron, L., Nolden, S., Heintzi, K. and Stewart, J. (2000) Assessment of the economic and social characteristics of LIHTC residents and neighborhoods: final report. Washington, DC: US Department of Housing and Urban Development .
5.
Ehrenreich, B. (2001) Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America . New York: Henry Holt.
6.
Grigsby, W.G. and Rosenburg, L. (1975) Urban Housing Policy. New York : APS Publications and Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University.
7.
Grigsby, W.G., Baratz, M. and Maclennan, D. (1983) Shelter subsidies for low income households. Research Report Series No. 3, Department of City and Regional Planning, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, PA.
8.
Haveman, R., Wolfe, B. and Spaulding, J. (1991) Childhood events and circumstances influencing high school completion, Demography, 28, pp. 133-157.
9.
Kain, J. (1981) A universal housing allowance program, in: K. L. BRADBURY and A. DowNs (Eds) Do Housing Allowances Work?, pp. 339-365. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
10.
Katz, L.F., Kling, J.R. and Liebman, J.B. (2001) Moving to Opportunity in Boston: early results of a randomized mobility experiment, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, pp. 607-654.
11.
Lang, R.E. (2002) Is the United States undersupplying housing?Housing Facts & Findings [Washington, DC : Fannie Mae Foundation], 4(2), pp. 1, 5-7.
12.
Maclennan, D., Gibb, K. and More, A. (1990) Paying for Britain's Housing. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Murray, M.P. (1983) Subsidized and unsubsidized housing starts: 1961-1977 , Review of Economics and Statistics, 65, pp. 590-597.
15.
Murray, M.P. (1999) Subsidized and unsubsidized housing stocks: 1935-1987 , Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 18, pp. 107-124.
16.
Olsen, E.O. (1981) Comments on John Kain, "A Universal Housing Allowance Program", in: K. L. Bradbury and A. Downs (Eds) Do Housing Allowances Work? , pp. 369-370. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
17.
Olsen, E.O. (2001) Housing programs for low-income households, Working Paper 8208, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
18.
Peterson, G.E. (2000) Housing vouchers: the U.S. experience, in: C. E. Steuerle, V. D. Ooms, G. E. Peterson and R. D. Reischauer (Eds) Vouchers and the Provision of Public Services, pp. 139-175. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
19.
Retsinas, N. P. and Belsky, E. S. (Eds) (2002) Low-income Homeownership: Examining the Unexamined Goal. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
20.
Riis, J.A. (1903) How the Other Half Lives: Studies among the Tenements of New York. New York: C. Scribner's Sons.
21.
Rosenbaum, E. and Harris, L.E. (2001) Residential mobility and opportunities: early impacts of the Moving to Opportunity demonstration program in Chicago, Housing Policy Debate, 12, pp.321-346.
22.
Rosenbaum, J.E. (1995) Changing the geography of opportunity by expanding residential choice: lessons from the Gautreaux program, Housing Policy Debate, 6, pp. 231-269.
23.
Sims, G.R. (1898) How the Poor Live; and, Horrible London. London: Chatto & Windus.
24.
Stone, M.E. (1993) Shelter Poverty: New Ideas on Housing Affordability . Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
25.
Straszheim, M.R. (1981) Participation, in: K. L. BRADBURY and A. DowNs (Eds) Do Housing Allowances Work?, pp. 113-140. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
26.
Turnham, J. and Khadduri, J. (2001) Issues and options for HUD's tenant-based housing assistance programs. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
27.
Us Census Bureau (2002) American Housing Survey for the United States: 2001. Current Housing Reports Series H150/01. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
28.
Us Department Of Housing And Urban Development ( 2000) Rental Housing Assistance-The Worsening Crisis . Washington, DC: Office of Policy Development and Research, US Department of Housing and Urban Development.
29.
Us Department Of Housing And Urban Development ( 2002) Blueprint for the American Dream. Washington, DC: US Department of Housing and Urban Development.
30.
Us General Accounting Office (1994) Elementary school children: many change schools frequently, harming their education. Report No. GAO/HEHS-94-45. Washington, DC: US General Accounting Office.
31.
Us General Accounting Office (2001) Costs and characteristics of federal housing assistance. Report No. GAO-01-901R. Washington, DC: US General Accounting Office.
