Jersey City and Detroit provide contrasting experience of the policy and politics in two US cities. Both can be seen as idealised 'pro-growth' regimes. Jersey City has benefited from the relocation of commercial and residential development out of Manhattan. The city has actively pursued new investment and has instigated various policies designed to spread the benefits of development across different sectoral and spatial communities. Detroit has endured enormous economic collapse, although there are limited signs of enhanced physical development. Policy-making and linkage programmes remain limited and contested. Overall reflections on policy-making in these cities point to the apparent importance of the mayor, a complex institutional environment, weak bureaucracies and interagency and intra-agency conflict. Regime formation remains relatively weak, especially in Detroit. In both areas, coalition-building can be overstressed to the detriment of the realities of, and opportunities created by, economic change in the wider economy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (1992) Neo-Marshallian nodes in global networks, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 16, pp. 571-587.
2.
Bates, T. and Howell, D. (1998) The declining status of minorities in the New York construction industry, Economic Development Quarterly, 12, pp. 88-100.
3.
Bockmeyer, J.L. (2000) A culture of distrust: the impact of local political culture on participation in the Detroit EZ, UrbanStudies , 37, pp. 2417-2440.
4.
Chaskin, R.J. and Abunimah, A. (1999) A view from the city: local government perspectives on neighbourhood-based governance in community-building initiatives, Journal of Urban Affairs, 21, pp. 57-78.
5.
City Of Detroit (1994) A Framework for Action: Recommendations of the Mayor's Land Use Task Force. Detroit : City of Detroit.
6.
City Of Detroit (1997) Building a World Class City: Progress Report on Economic Development in the City of Detroit. Detroit: City of Detroit .
7.
City Of Detroit (undated) Detroit's Community Re-investment Strategy, Through the Eyes of its Citizens. Detroit: City of Detroit.
8.
City Of Jersey City (1995) 1995-2000, Consolidated Plan. City of Jersey City.
9.
Clavel, P. (1986) The Progressive City: Planning and Participation, 1969-1984, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
10.
Clavel, P. and Kleniewski, N. (1990) Space for progressive local policy: examples from the United States and the United Kingdom, in: J. R. Logan and T. Swanstrom (Eds) Beyond the City Limits: Urban Policy and Economic Restructuring in Comparative Perspective, pp. 199-234. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
11.
Detroit Free Press (1999) Funds sit unused as residents seek help, 24 March.
12.
DiGaetano, A. (1997) Urban governing alignments and re-alignments in comparative prespective: development politics in Boston, Massachusetts, and Bristol, England, 1980-1996, Urban Affairs Review, 32, pp. 844-870.
13.
DiGaetano, A. and Klemanski, J.S. (1999) Power and City Governance: Comparative Perspectives on Urban Development. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
14.
DiGaetano, A. and Lawless, P. (1999) Urban governance and industrial decline: governing structures and policy agendas in Birmingham and Sheffield, England and Detroit, Michigan, 1980-1997, Urban Affairs Review, 34, pp.546-577.
15.
Docherty, I. (2000) Institutional geography and regime governance: the case of local rail transport policy, Space and Polity , 4, pp. 109-130.
16.
Haughton, G. and While, A. (1999) From corporate city to citizens city? Urban leadership after local entrepreneurialism in the United Kingdom, Urban Affairs Review, 35, pp. 3-23.
17.
Hay, C. ( 1996) Re-stating Social and Political Change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
18.
Hudson County Improvement Authority (1994) Overall Economic Development Program. Hudson County, NJ : Hudson County Improvement Authority.
19.
Jersey City (1995) Martin Luther King Drive: Redevelopment Plan. Jersey City: Division of City Planning and Department of Housing and Economic Development .
20.
Judd, D.R. and Swanstrom, T. (1998) City Politics: Private Power and Public Policy , 2nd edn. New York: Longman.
21.
Judge, D. (1995) Pluralism, in: D. Judge, G. Stoker and H. Wolman (Eds) Theories of Urban Politics , pp. 13-34. London: Sage.
22.
Kantor, P. (1995) The Dependent City Revisited. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
23.
Kantor, P., Savitch, H.V. and Haddock, S. (1997) The political economy of urban regimes: a comparative perspective, Urban Affairs Review, 32, pp. 348-377.
24.
Leroy, G. (1994) No More Candy Store: States and Cities Making Job Subsidies Accountable. Chicago, IL: Federation for Industrial Retention and Renewal.
25.
Logan, J.R., Whaley, R.B. and Crowder, K. (1997) The character and consequences of growth regimes: an assessment of 20 years of research, Urban Affairs Review , 32, pp. 603-630.
26.
Meiklejohn, S.J. (1998) Zone is where the heart is? Lessons from Detroit employers, Economic Development Quarterly, 12, pp. 355-371.
27.
Nickel, D.R. (1995) The progressive city? Urban redevelopment in Minneapolis , Urban Affairs Review, 30, pp. 355-377.
28.
Painter, J. (1997) Regulation, regime and practice in urban politics , in: M. Lauria (Ed.) Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory, pp. 122-143. London: Sage.
29.
Peters, B.G. ((1996) The Future of Governing: Four Emerging Models . Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
30.
Pierre, J. (1999) Models of urban governance: the institutional dimension of urban politics, Urban Affairs Review, 34, pp. 372-396.
31.
Raco, M. (1998) Assessing 'institutional thickness' in the local context: a comparison of Cardiff and Sheffield, Environment and Planning A, 30, pp. 975-996.
32.
Rogowsky, E.T. and Berkman, R., with Strom, E. and Maniscalco, A.J. (1995) New York City's Outer Borough Development Strategy, in: F. W. Wagner , T. E. Joder and A. J. Mumphrey (Eds) Urban Revitalization: Policies and Programmes, pp. 69-101. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
Savitch, H.V. (1990) Post-industrialism with a difference: Global Capitalism and World-Class Cities, in: J. R. Logan and T. Swanstrom (Eds) Beyond the City Limits, pp. 150-174, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
34.
Schundler, B. (1999) Jersey City: from mess to Mecca, New Jersey Municipalities, December, pp. 1-4.
35.
Shirley, D. (1997) Community Organising for Urban School Reform. Austin, TX : University of Texas Press.
36.
Simpson, D. and Carsey, T. (1999) Council coalitions and mayoral regimes in Chicago , Journal of Urban Affairs, 21, pp. 79-100.
37.
Sites, W. (1997) The limits of urban regime theory: New York under Koch, Dinkins and Giuliani, Urban Affairs Review, 32, pp. 536-557.
38.
Smith, M.P. (1989) The uses of linked development policies in US cities, in: M. Parkinson, B. Foley, and D. Judd (Eds) Regenerating the Cities: The UK Crisis and the US Experience, pp. 85-99. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
39.
Stoker, G. (1995) Regime theory and urban politics, in: D. Judge , G. Stoker and H. Wolman (Eds) Theories of Urban Politics, pp. 54-71, London : Sage.
40.
Stoker, G. and Mossberger, K. (1994) Urban regime theory in comparative perspective , Environment and Planning C, 12, pp. 185-212.
41.
Stone, C.N. (1989) Regime Politics Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas .
42.
Stone, C.N. (1993) Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: a political economy approach, Journal of Urban Affairs, 15, pp. 1-28.
43.
Sugrue, T.J. (1996) The Origins of the Urban Crisis: Race and Inequality in Post-warDetroit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44.
Sullivan, D.M. and Green, G.P. (1999) Business subsidies and municipal controls, Journal of Urban Affairs, 21, pp. 267-280.
45.
Thomas, J.M. (1997) Redevelopment and Race: Planning a Finer City in Post-warDetroit. Baltimore, MD : The Johns Hopkins University Press.
46.
Urban News (1999) Uebbing's appointment to HEDC stalled by Council, 12 March.
47.
Vergara, C.M. (1995) Downtown Detroit: an American Acropolis, Planning, 61, pp. 18-19.
