This paper examines the impact that alternative state planning frameworks have on five dimensions of urban development: density, the spatial extent of urbanised land area, property value, public expenditures on infrastructure and population change. The objectives of the analysis are threefold. First, the background discussion provides a brief overview of urban sprawl as a public policy problem and outlines how state growth management programmes attempt to respond to it. Secondly, the empirical analysis examines the effects of growth management in a cross-section of metropolitan counties during the 1982-97 time-period. The five outcome measures are modelled in a simultaneous equations framework in order to test several specific hypotheses about how state land-use policies affect the character of urban growth. Thirdly, the results of the empirical analysis are described within the context of previous research on the effectiveness of growth management. The findings suggest that state growth management programmes with strong consistency requirements and enforcement mechanisms hold much promise for reducing urban sprawl, while programmes that do not require consistency and/or have weak enforcement mechanisms may inadvertently contribute to it.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abate, F. (Ed.) (1994) American Places Dictionary: A Guide to 45,000 Populated Places, Natural Features, and Other Places in the United States, vols 1-4. Detroit, MI: Omni-graphics .
2.
Altshuler, A. and Gomes-Ibanez, J. (1993) Regulation for Revenue: The Political Economy of Land Use Exactions. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
3.
Blanco, H. (1998) The effectiveness of policies to contain urban sprawl and their evolution in Florida, Oregon, and Vermont. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Collegiate Schools of Planning, Pasadena, October.
4.
Bollens, S. (1992) State growth management: intergovernmental frameworks and policy objectives, Journal of the American Planning Association , 58, pp. 454-466.
5.
Bollens, S. (1993) Restructuring land use governance, Journal of Planning Literature, 7, pp.211-226.
6.
Brueckner, J. (2000) Urban sprawl: diagnosis and remedies, International Regional Science Review, 23, 160-171.
7.
Burby, R. and May, P. (1997) Making Governments Plan. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8.
Burchell, R. (1998) The costs of sprawl—revisited. Transportation Cooperative Research Program Report 39. Washington, DC : National Academy Press.
9.
Carruthers, J. (2001) Growth at the fringe: the influence of political fragmentation in United States metropolitan areas. Paper presented at the Regional Science Association International meeting , Charleston, November.
10.
Carruthers, J. (2002) Evaluating the effectiveness of regulatory growth management programs: an analytical framework for interregional analysis, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21, pp. 206-420.
11.
Carruthers, J. and Ulfarsson, G. (2001) Urban sprawl and the cost of public services. Paper presented at the meeting of the Pacific Regional Science Conference Organization, Portland, July.
12.
Carruthers, J. and Ulfarsson, G. (2002) Fragmentation and sprawl: evidence from interregional analysis, Growth and Change, 33, pp. 312-340.
13.
Degrove, J. (1992) The New Frontier for Land Policy: Planning and Growth Management in the States. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
14.
Deyle, R. and Smith, R. (1998) Local government compliance with state planning mandates: the effects of state implementation in Florida, Journal of the American Planning Association, 64, pp. 457-469.
15.
Downs, A. (1992) Stuck in Traffic: Coping with Peak-hour Traffic Congestion. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
16.
Downs, A. (1994) New Visions for Metropolitan America. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
17.
Downs, A. (1999) Some realities about sprawl and decline, Housing Policy Debate, 10, pp. 955-974.
18.
Ewing, R. (1997) Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable?, Journal of the American Planning Association, 63, pp. 107-126.
19.
Fischel, W. (1985) The Economics of Zoning Laws: A Property Rights Approach to American Land Use Controls. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
20.
Fischel, W. (1990) Do Growth Controls Matter? A Review of Empirical Evidence on the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Local Government Land Use Regulation. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
21.
Fulton, W. (1999) Guide to California Planning. Point Arena, CA: Solano Press Books.
22.
Fulton, W., Pendall, R., Nguyen, M. and Harrison, A. (2001) Who Sprawls the Most? How Growth Patterns Differ across the U.S. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
23.
Gale, D. (1992) Eight state-sponsored growth management programs: a comparative analysis, Journal of the American Planning Association , 58, pp. 425-439.
24.
Glickfield, M. and Levine, N. (1992) Regional Growth... Local Reaction: The Enactment and Effects of Local Growth Control and Management Measures in California. Cambridge, MA: TheLincoln Institute of Land Policy.
25.
Gottdiener, M. and Neiman, M. (1981) Characteristics of support for local growth control , Urban Affairs Quarterly, 17, pp. 55-73.
26.
Kelly, E. (1993) Managing Community Growth: Policies, Techniques, and Impacts. Westport, CT: Praeger .
27.
Kennedy, P. (1998) A Guide to Econometrics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
28.
Kline, J. and Alig, R. (1999) Does land use planning slow the conversion of forest and farm lands?, Growth and Change, 30, pp. 3-22.
29.
Knaap, G. (1998) The determinants of residential property values: implications for metropolitan planning, Journal of Planning Literature, 12, pp.267-282.
30.
Knaap, G. and Hopkins, L. (2001) An inventory approach to urban growth boundaries , Journal of the American Planning Association, 67, pp.314-326.
31.
Knaap, G. and Nelson, A. (1992) The Regulated Landscape: Lessons on State Land Use Planning from Oregon. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
32.
Landis, J. (1992) Do growth controls work? A new assessment, Journal of the American Planning Association, 58, pp. 489-508.
33.
Lewis, P. (1996) Shaping Suburbia: How Political Institutions Organize Urban Development. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
34.
Nelson, A. (2000) Effects of urban containment on housing prices and landowner behaviour, Landlines, 12(2), pp. 1-3.
35.
Nelson, A. and Peterman, D. (2000) Does growth management matter? The effect of growth management on economic performance, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19, pp. 277-285.
36.
Nelson, A., Duncan, J., Mullen, C. and Bishop, K. (1995) Growth Management: Principles and Practices. Chicago, IL: Planners Press, APA.
37.
Nicholas, J. and Steiner, R. (2000) Growth management and smart growth in Florida, Wake Forest Law Review, 35, pp. 645-670.
38.
Orfield, M. (1997) Metropolitics: A Regional Agendafor Community and Stability. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.
39.
Pendall, R. (1999) Do land use controls cause sprawl?, Environment and Planning B, 26, pp. 555-571.
40.
Pendall, R. (2000) Local land use regulation and the chain of exclusion , Journal of the American Planning Association, 66, pp. 125-142.
41.
Phillips, J. and Goodstein, E. (2000) Growth management and housing prices: the case of Portland Oregon, Contemporary Economic Policy, 18, pp. 334-344.
42.
Pindyck R. and Rubinfield, D. (1991) Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts. New York: McGraw-Hill.
43.
Porter, D. (1997) Managing Growth in America's Communities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
44.
Richardson, H. and Gordon, P. (2001) Portland and Los Angeles: beauty and the beast . Paper presented at the meeting of the Pacific Regional Science Conference Organization, Portland, July.
45.
Rusk, D. (1999) Inside Game, Outside Game: Winning Strategies for Saving Urban America. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.
46.
Shen, Q. (1996) Spatial impacts of locally enacted growth controls: the San Francisco Bay region in the 1980s, Environment and Planning B, 23, pp. 61-91.
47.
Usa Counties (various years) Agriculture-Land in Farms, Average Value, Family Farms (available at: http://www.census.gov/statab/www./county.html).
48.
Us Bureau Of The Census (various years) County and City Data Book. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
49.
Us Bureau Of The Census (various years) State and Metropolitan Area Data Book. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
50.
Us Bureau Of The Census (various years) State Population Estimates (available at: http://www.census.gov/population/www./estimates/statepop.html).
51.
Us Census Of Governments (various years) Vol. 1, No. 1, Government Organization. Washington D.C.: US Government Printing Office.
52.
Us Census Of Governments (various years) Vol. 2, No. 1, Assessed Valuations for Local General Property Taxation. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
53.
US Census of Governments (various years) Vol. 4, No. 5, Compendium of Government Finances. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
54.
Weitz, J. (1999) Sprawl Busting: State Programs to Guide Growth . Chicago, IL: Planners Press, APA
55.
Weitz, J. and Moore, T. (1998) Development inside urban growth boundaries: Oregon's empirical evidence of continuous urban form, Journal of the American Planning Association, 64, pp. 424-444.
