The increasing interest in the potential use of fiscal incentives as a mechanism for stimulating urban renewal has been highlighted by a number of influential policy sources. This paper assesses the application and outcomes of tax-based incentives in urban regeneration, with particular focus upon the differing models represented by Dublin (Ireland) and Chicago (USA). Issues considered include utilisation of tax incentives, drawing-down of benefits, role of actor groups, ability to lever private-sector finance, impact on property market performance and wider economic influences. Conclusions advance the case for tax-based mechanisms as an instrument in the delivery of urban regeneration but stress the need for complementary structures to exploit fully the fiscal incentives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aalen, F. and Whelan, K. (1991) Dublin: City and County from Prehistory to Present: Studies in Honour of J. H. Andrews. Dublin: Geography Publications.
2.
Adair, A., Berry, J. and McGreal, S. (1993) Investment and private sector residential development in inner-city Dublin, Journal of Property Valuation and Investment,12(1), pp. 47-56.
3.
Adair, A., Berry, J. and McGreal, S. (1994) Taxation allowances and profiles: commercial property development in Dublin, Journal of PropertyFinance, 5(1), pp. 9-13.
4.
Adair, A., Berry, J., Deddis, W. ET AL. (1998) Accessing Private Finance: The Availability and Effectiveness of Private Finance in Urban Regeneration. London: Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.
5.
Adams, D., Disberry, A., Hutchison, N. and Munjoma, T. (1999) Do landowners constrain urban redevelopment. Aberdeen Papers in Land Economy, Discussion Paper: No. 99-01, Universtity of Aberdeen.
6.
Andrews, J.H. (1999) The TIFs go on, Planning, 165, pp. 8-11.
7.
Atkinson, R. and Moon, G. (1994) Urban Policy in Britain: The City, the State and the Market. London: Macmillan.
8.
Berry, J. and McGreal, S. (1996) Taxation allowances: implications for property investment and development in Dublin and Berlin, Journal of PropertyFinance, 7(3), pp. 68-77.
9.
Berry, J., McGreal, S., Stevenson, S. and Young, J. (2001) Government intervention and impact on the housing market in Greater Dublin, Housing Studies, 16, pp. 755-769.
10.
Dye, R.F. and Merriman, D.F. (1999) Popular financing tool hurts, Engineering News Record, 243(4), p. 123.
11.
Dye, R.F. and Palmer, R. (1997) The future of tax increment finance in Illinois . Institute of Government and Public Affairs, University of Illinois.
12.
Evans, B. and Bate, R. (2000) A Taxing Question: The Contribution of Economic Instruments to Planning Objectives. London: The Town and Country Planning Association.
13.
Fulford, C. (1998) Urban Housing Capacity and the Sustainable City: The Costs of Reclaiming Derelict Sites. London: The Town and Country Planning Association.
14.
Irish Mortgage Corporation (1995) Irish Mortgage Corporation Guide to the New Designated Area Tax Incentives . Dublin: Irish Mortgage Corporation .
15.
Jones, C. and Watkins, C. (1996) Urban regeneration and sustainable markets, UrbanStudies, 33, pp. 1129-1140.
16.
Kaufman, J.L. (1998) Chicago: segregation and the new urban poverty, in: S. Musterd and W. Ostendorf (Eds) Urban Segregation and the Welfare State: Inequality and Exclusion in Westem Cities, pp. 45-63. London: Routledge.
17.
Klemanski, J.S. (1990) Using tax increment financing for urban redevelopment projects, Economic Development Quarterly, 4, pp. 23-28.
18.
Kpmg (1996) Study on the Urban Renewal Schemes. Dublin: Department of the Environment.
19.
Lawrence, D.B. and Stephenson, S.C. (1995) The economics and politics of tax increment financing, Growth and Change, 26, pp. 105-137.
20.
Man, J.Y. (1999a) The impact of tax increment financing programs on local economic development, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 11, pp. 417-430.
21.
Man, J.Y. (1999b) Fiscal pressure, tax competition and adoption of tax increment financing, Urban Studies, 36, pp. 1151-1167.
22.
Mccarthy, J. (1999) Chicago: a case study of social exclusion and city regeneration, Cities, 16, pp. 323-331.
23.
National Audit Office (1986) Enterprise Zones. London: National Audit Office.
24.
Richard Ellis AND Gillespies ( 1995) An Evaluation of the Enterprise Zone Experiment. London: Richard Ellis and Gillespies.
25.
Robson, B., Bradford, M.Deas, I. ET AL. (1994) Assessing the Impact of Urban Policy: Inner City Research Programme. London: HMSO.
26.
SCS/IPD (2001) Irish Property Index. London: The Society of Chartered Surveyors/Investment Property Index.
27.
Urban Task Force (1999) Towards an Urban Renaissance. London: Routledge .
28.
Wood, G.A. (1990) The tax treatment of housing ; economic issues and reform measures, UrbanStudies, 27, pp. 822-829.
