For at least three decades, the issue of physical accessibility has been a focus of analysis amongst some spatial scientists, including geographers, urban planners and architects. Whilst such 'conventional' access studies have assumed an important role as policy evaluation/ critique, their theoretical significance has been extremely limited. The understanding of accessibility, and the highly contested set of policy fields that regulates this, would be deepened if a wider range of socio-political theory was used to examine these issues. This paper contributes to the social theorisation of access by critically exploring how the 'reflexive modernisation' thesis of Ulrich Beck might be applied to the geographical understanding of disablement. The paper demonstrates how Beck's theoretical framework can be used to enrich understanding of the genesis and mediation of inaccessibility.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Archibugi, D. and Held, D. (Eds) (1995) Cosmopolitan Democracy: An Agenda for a New World Order. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
2.
Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. trans. by M. Ritter. London: Sage.
3.
Beck, U. (1995) Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk. trans. by A. Weisz. Cambridge: Polity Press .
4.
Beck, U. (1997) The Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order. trans. by M. Ritter. Cambridge : Polity Press.
5.
Beck, U. (1998) Democracy Without Enemies. trans. by M. Ritter . Cambridge: Polity Press.
6.
Beck, U. (2000) What is Globalization?. trans. by P. Camiller. Cambridge: Polity Press.
7.
Beck, U., Giddens, A. and Lash, S. (Eds) ( 1994) Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
8.
Bennett, T. (1990) Planning and people with disabilities, in: J. Montgomery and A. Thornley (Eds) Radical Planning Initiatives: New Directions for Planning in the 1990s, pp. 259-269. Aldershot: Gower.
9.
Blowers, A. (1997) Society and sustainability: the context of change for planning, in: A. Blowers and B. Evans (Eds) Town Planning into the 21st Century, pp. 153-179. London: Routledge .
10.
Brail, R., Hughes, J. and Arthur, C. (1976) Transportation Services for the Disabled and Elderly . Center for Urban Policy and Research, New Brunswick, NJ.
11.
Butler, R.E. and Bowlby, S. (1997) Bodies and Spaces: an Exploration of Disabled People's Experiences of Public Space, Environment and Planning D, 15, pp. 411-433.
12.
Butler, R. and Parr, H. (Eds) (1999) Mind and Body Spaces: Geographies of Impairment, Illness and Disability, London: Routledge.
13.
Campbell, J. and Oliver, M. (1996) Disability Politics: Understanding Our Past, Changing Our Future. London: Routledge.
14.
Campbell, S. (1994) The valued norm: supported accommodation for people with disabilities: a discussion paper. Ageing and Disability Services Directorate, Department of Community Services, Sydney, New South Wales.
15.
Carter, H. (1983) An Introduction to Urban Historical Geography. London: Edward Arnold.
16.
Castells M. (1983) The City and the Grassroots. London: Edward Arnold.
17.
Chouinard, V. (1997) Making space for disabling differences: challenging ableist geographies, Environment and Planning D, 15, pp.379-387.
18.
Cook, I. (1991) Drowning in see-world? Critical ethnographies of blindness. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Kentucky , Lexington, KY.
19.
Dear, M. (1992) Understanding and overcoming the NIMBY syndrome , Journal of the American Planning Association, 58, pp. 288-289.
20.
Dear, M., Gaber, S.L., Takahashi, L. and Wilton, R. (1997) Seeing people differently: the sociospatial construction of disability, Environment and Planning D, 15, pp. 455-480.
21.
Doray, B. (1988) From Taylorism to Fordism: A Rational Madness. London: Free Association.
22.
Dorn, M. (1994) Disability as spatial dissidence: a cultural geography of the stigmatized body. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, Pennsylvania State University.
23.
Duncan, N. (1996) BodySpace: Destabilising Geographies of Gender and Sexuality. London: Routledge .
24.
Dyck, I. (1995) Hidden geographies: the changing lifeworlds of women with disabilities, Social Science and Medicine, 40, pp. 307-320.
25.
Franklin, J. (Ed.) (1998) The Politics of Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity Press (in association with the Institute for Public Policy Research).
26.
Fraser, N. (1997) Justice Interruptus: Reflections on the 'Postsocialist' Condition. New York: Routledge.
27.
Gant, R. (1992) Transport for the disabled, Geography , 77, pp. 88-91.
28.
Gibson, K. and Watson, S. (1995) Postmodern spaces, cities and politics: an introduction , in: S. Watson and K. Gibson (Eds) Postmodern Cities and Spaces , pp. 1-10. Oxford : Black-well.
29.
Giddens, A. (1998) Risk society: the context of British politics, in: J. Franklin (Ed.) The Politics of Risk Society, pp. 23-34. Cambridge: Polity Press (in association with the Institute for Public Policy Research).
30.
Gilderbloom, J.I. and Rosentraub, M.S. (1990) Creating the accessible city: proposals for providing housing and transportation for low income, elderly and disabled people, American Journal of Economics and Sociology , 49, pp.271-282.
31.
Gleeson, B.J. (1997) The regulation of environmental accessibility in New Zealand, International PlanningStudies, 2, pp. 367-390.
32.
Gleeson, B.J. (1998) A place on earth: technology, space and disability , Journal of Urban Technology, 5, pp. 1-19.
33.
Gleeson, B.J. (1999) Geographies of Disability. London: Routledge.
34.
Gleeson, B.J. (2000) Reflexive modernisation: the re-enlightenment of planning?, International PlanningStudies, 5, pp. 117-135.
35.
Gleeson, B.J. and Kearns, R. (forthcoming) Re-moralising landscapes of care, Environment and Planning D.
36.
Gleeson, B.J. and Low, N.P. (2000) Australian Urban Planning: New Challenges, New Agendas. Sydney: Allen and Unwin .
37.
Golledge, R.G. (1991) Tactual strip maps as navigational aids, Journal of Visual Impairment And Blindness, 85(7) pp. 296-301.
38.
Hahn, H. (1986) Disability and the urban environment: a perspective on Los Angeles, Environment and Planning D, 4, pp. 273-288.
39.
Hall, E. (1997) Work spaces: refiguring the disability-employment debate, Royal Geographical SocietylInstitute of British Geographers Annual Conference, Exeter.
40.
Harvey, D. (2000) Spaces of Hope. Berkeley, CA : University of California Press.
41.
Horin, A. (1998) CBD 'turns back on' disabled, Sydney Morning Herald, 5 June, p. 9.
42.
Imrie, R.F. (1996a) Disability and the City: International Perspectives . London: Paul Chap-man.
43.
Imrie, R.F. (1996b) Equity, social justice, and planning for access and disabled people: an international perspective, International PlanningStudies, 1, pp. 17-34.
44.
Imrie, R. (2000) Disabling environments and the geography of access policies and practices, Disability and Society, 15, pp. 5-24.
45.
Imrie, R.F. and Wells, P.E. (1993a) Disablism, planning and the built environment , Environment and PlanningC, 11, pp. 213-231.
46.
Imrie, R.F. and Wells, P.E. (1993b) Creating barrier-free environments, Town and Country Planning, 61(10) pp. 278-281.
47.
Jacobs, J. and Fincher, R. (1998) Introduction, in: R. Fincher and J. Jacobs (Eds) Cities of Difference, pp. 1-25. New York: Guilford.
48.
Lash, S. and Wynne, B. (1992) Introduction, in: U. BECK Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity , pp. 1-8. London: Sage.
49.
Lavett, T. (1998) Planning for inclusive communities-providing equitable access for people with disabilities, QueenslandPlanner, 38(4) pp. 34-36.
50.
Lowe, D. (1986) Urban Social Movements: The City after Castells . New York : St Martins Press.
51.
Mark-Lawson, J. and Warde, A. (1987) Industrial restructuring and the transformation of a local political environment: a case study of Lancaster. Working Paper No. 33, Lancaster Regionalism Group, University of Lancaster.
52.
Martin, E. (1999) Improving Access to Heritage Buildings: A Practical Guide to Meeting the Needs of People with Disabilities. Canberra: Australian Council of National Trusts and Australian Heritage Commission.
53.
Matthews, M.H. and Vujakovic, P. (1995) Private worlds and public places: mapping the environmental values of wheelchair users, Environment and Planning A, 27, pp. 1069-1083.
54.
Morris, J. (1991) Pride Against Prejudice: Transforming Attitudes to Disability. London: The Women's Press.
55.
Mumford, L. (1996) The City in History. Harmondsworth : Penguin.
56.
Oliver, M. (1990) The Politics of Disablement. London: Macmillan.
57.
Oliver, M. (1991) Disability and participation in the labour market , in: P. Brown and R. Scase (Eds) Poor Work: Disadvantage and the Division of Labour, pp. 132-146. London: Open University Press.
58.
Oliver, M. (1993) Disability and dependency: a creation of industrial societies?, in: J. Swain, V. Finkelstein, S. French and M. Oliver (Eds) Disabling Barriers — Enabling Environments, pp. 49-60. London : Sage.
59.
Park, D.C. and Radford, J. (1997) Space, place and the asylum: an introduction, Health and Place, 3(2), pp. 71-72.
60.
Park, D.C., Radford, J.P. and Vickers, M.H. (1998) Disability studies in human geography, Progress in Human Geography, 22, pp. 208-233.
61.
Pile, S. (1996) The Body and the City: Psychoanalysis, Space and Subjectivity. London: Routledge .
62.
Reimer, S. (1998) Working in a risk society, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, NS, 23, pp. 116-127.
63.
Sandercock, L. (1998) Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities. Chichester: Wiley.
64.
Shapiro, J.P. (1993) No Pity: People with Disabilities Forging a New Civil Rights Movement. New York: Times .
65.
Sibley, D. (1995) Geographies of Exclusion: Society and Difference in the West. London: Routledge.
66.
Stewart, B. (1993) New Human Rights Bill is a big advance, New Zealand Disabled, July, pp. 8-10.
67.
Wrightson, W. (1989) From Barrier Free to Safe Environnments: The New Zealand Experience. New York: World Rehabilitation Fund.
68.
Yeatman, A. (1996) Getting Real: The Interim Report of the Review of the Commonwealth/ State Disability Agreement. Canberra : Australian Government Publishing Service.
69.
Young, I.M. (1990) Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
