The influences of urban form and transport infrastructure on economic performance show up in several contemporary policy debates, notably 'sprawl versus compact city' and in the developing world, the future of mega-cities. This paper probes these relationships using two scales of analysis. At the macro scale, an econometric analysis using data across 47 US metropolitan areas reveals that employment densities and urban primacy are positively associated with worker productivity, suggesting the presence of agglomeration economies. Congested freeways are shown to be a consequence of strong economic performance. An intrametropolitan analysis using data on sub-districts of the San Francisco Bay Area generally reinforces the findings of the macro-scale analysis. In the Bay Area, labour productivity appears to increase with size of labour-marketshed and high accessibility between residences and firms. Higher employment density and well-functioning infrastructure also contribute positively to economic performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Acemoglu, D. (1996). A microfoundation for social increasing returns in human capital accumulation, Quarterly Journal of Economics , 111(3), pp. 779-804.
2.
Alonso, W. (1971) The economics of urban size, Papers of theRegional Science Association, 26, pp. 67-83.
3.
American Farmland Trust (1994) Farming on the Edge: A New Look at the Importance and Vulnerability of Agriculture near American Cities. Washington, DC: American Farmland Trust.
4.
Aschauer, D. (1989) Is public expenditures productive ?, Journal of Monetary Economics23, pp. 177-240.
5.
Beeson, P. (1987) Total factor productivity growth and agglomeration economies in manufacturing, Journal of Regional Science, 27, pp. 183-199.
6.
Boarnet, M. (1997a) Highways and economic productivity: interpreting recent evidence, Journal of Planning Literature, 11, pp. 476-486.
7.
Boarnet, M. (1997b) Infrastructure services and productivity of public capital: the case of streets and highways, 1997, National Tax Journal, 50, pp. 39-57.
8.
Bogart, W. (1998) The Economics of Cities and Suburbs. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
9.
Burchell, R. (1992) Impact Assessment of the New Jersey Interim State Development and Re-development Plan. Trenton, NJ: New Jersey Office of State Planning.
10.
Burchell, R. (2000) The State of Cities and Sprawl: Bridging the Divide . Washington, DC: US Department of Housing and Urban Development.
11.
Burchell, R., Listokin, D., Shad, N. ET AL. (1998) Cost of Sprawl Revisited: The Evidence on Sprawl's Negative and Positive Impacts. Washington, DC : Transportation Research Board.
12.
Castells, M. (1996) The Rise of the Network Society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
13.
Center For Urban Policy Research (1999) The State of the Nation's Cities: A Comprehensive Database on American Cities and Suburbs. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University (available at: http://policy.rutgers/edu/cupr/cuprlite/sonc.htm).
14.
Cervero, R. (1996) Jobs-housing balance revisited: trends and impacts in the San Francisco Bay Area, Journal of the American Planning Association, 62, pp. 492-511.
15.
Cervero, R. (1998) The Transit Metropolis: A Global Inquiry. Washington, DC: Island Press.
16.
Cervero, R. and Wu, K. (1997) Polycentrism, commuting, and residential location in the San Francisco Bay Area, Environment and Planning A , 29, pp. 865-886.
17.
Ciccone, A. and Hall, R. (1996) Productivity and the density of economic activity , American Economic Review, 86, pp. 54-70.
18.
Downs, A. (1992) Stuck in Traffic: Coping with Peak-hour Traffic Congestion. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
19.
Duncan, J. and Frank, J. (1989) The Search for Efficient Urban Growth Patterns . Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Community Affairs.
20.
Garcia-Mila, T., Mcguire, T. and Porter, R. (1996) The effects of public capital in state-level production functions reconsidered, Review of Economics and Statistics78, 177-180.
21.
Glaeser, E., Kallal, H., Scheinkman, J. and Schleifer, A. (1992) Growth in cities, Journal of Political Economy, 100, pp. 1126-1152.
22.
Gordon, P. and Richardson, H. (1995) Sustainable congestion, in: J. Brotchie, M. Batty , E. Blakely ET Al. (Eds) Cities in Competition: Productive and Sustainable Cities for the 21st Century , pp. 348-358. Sydney: Longman Australia.
23.
Grubler, A. (1990) The Rise and Fall of Infrastructure. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
24.
Henderson, J. (1974) The sizes and types of cities, American Economic Review, 64, pp. 640-656.
25.
Holtz-Eakin, D. (1994) Public-sector capital and the productivity puzzle , Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, pp. 12-21.
26.
Hupkes, G. (1982) The law of constant travel time and trip rates , Futures, 14, pp. 38-46.
27.
Kain, J. (1993) The spatial mismatch hypothesis: three decades later, Housing Policy Debate, 3, pp.371-460.
28.
Kenworthy, J. and Laube, F. (1999) An International Sourcebook of Automobile Dependence in Cities: 1960-1990. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.
29.
Kojima, R. (1996) Introduction: Population Migration and Urbanization in Developing Countries, The DevelopingEconomics, 34, pp. 349-369.
30.
Krugman, P. (1993) First nature, second nature, and metropolitan location , Journal of Regional Science, 33, pp. 129-144.
31.
Landis, J. (2001) Sprawl in California: Its Extent, Consequences, and Future. San Francisco, CA, and Boston, MA: Public Policy Institute of California and the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy (forthcoming).
32.
Marshall, A. (1952) Principles of Economics. New York: Macmillan.
33.
Mills, E. and Hamilton, B. (1989) Urban Economics, 4th edn. Glenview, IL: Scott, Fores-man, and Company.
34.
Nelson, A. and Peterman, D. (2000) Does growth management matter? The effect of growth management on economic performance, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19, pp. 277-285.
35.
Pisarski, A. (1992) Travel Behavior Issues in the 90s. HPM-40, Office of Highway Information Management , US Department of Transportation , Washington, DC.
36.
Porter, D. (1997) Managing Growth in America's Communities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
37.
Prud'Homme, R. (1996) Urban transportation and economic development. Paper presented at CODATU VII, New Delhi, India, February.
38.
Prud'Homme, R. and Lee, G. (1999) Sprawl, speed and the efficiency of cities, Urban Studies, 36, pp. 1849-1858.
39.
Purvis, C. (1994) Detailed Commute Characteristics in the San Francisco Bay Area. Census Working Paper No. 7, Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Oakland, CA.
40.
Real Estate Research Corporation (1974) The Cost of Sprawl: Environmental and Economic Costs of Alternative Residential Development Patterns at the Urban Fringe. Washington, DC : US Government Printing Office.
41.
Richardson, H. (1973) The Economics of Urban Size. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath/Lexington Books.
42.
Rondinelli, D. (1985) Equity, growth, and development: regional analysis in developing countries, Journal of the American Planning Association, 51, pp. 434-448.
43.
Saxenian, A. (1994) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
Segal, D. (1976) Are there returns to scale in city size?, Review of Economics and Statistics, 58, pp. 339-350.
45.
Shefer, D. (1973) Localization economics in SM-SAs: a production function analysis, Journal of Regional Science, 13, pp. 55-64.
46.
Schrank, D. and Lomax, T. (1999) The 1999 Annual Mobility Report: Information for Urban America. College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute.
47.
Simpson, W. (1992) Urban Structure and the Labor Market: Worker Mobility, Commuting, and Underemployment in Cities. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
48.
Soegijoko, B. (1992) Spatial development: future prospects, in: T. Kim, G. Knaap and I. Azis (Eds) Spatial Development in Indonesia, pp. 71-89. Aldershot: Avebury.
49.
Soroka, L. (1984) Manufacturing productivity and city size in Canada, 1975 and 1985: does population matter?, Urban Studies, 31, pp. 895-911.
50.
Sveiauskas, L. (1975) The productivity of cities, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 89, pp. 393-414.
